---
title: "MyoSTAT.AI: Reproducible AI Toolkit for Myocardial Stiffness Tracking and Shear‑Wave Velocity Stab"
id: "medrxiv-5-myocardial-stiffness-tracking-assessment-toolkit-driven-by-artificial"
canonical_url: "https://medichelpline.com/clinical-feed/medrxiv-5-myocardial-stiffness-tracking-assessment-toolkit-driven-by-artificial"
content_type: "clinical_feed_article"
specialty: "Cardiology"
source_name: "medRxiv (Clinical Preprints)"
source_url: "https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.17.26363353v1?rss=1"
published_at: "2026-09-20T12:00:00.000Z"
evidence_level: "Verified Feed"
license: "CC-BY-NC-4.0 / Informational Use"
---
# MyoSTAT.AI: Reproducible AI Toolkit for Myocardial Stiffness Tracking and Shear‑Wave Velocity Stab
## Provenance & Clinical Metadata
- **Canonical URL:** https://medichelpline.com/clinical-feed/medrxiv-5-myocardial-stiffness-tracking-assessment-toolkit-driven-by-artificial
- **Specialty:** [Cardiology](https://medichelpline.com/clinical-feed/cardiology.md)
- **Primary Source:** medRxiv (Clinical Preprints)
- **Source URL:** [Original Journal Publication](https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.17.26363353v1?rss=1)
- **Published At:** 2026-09-20T12:00:00.000Z
- **Evidence Rating:** Verified Feed
## Executive GIST (TL;DR)
- The authors present MyoSTAT.AI, a deterministic, fully reproducible pipeline for automated real-time **cardiac** segmentation and shear‑wave elastography (SWE) velocity-field estimation evaluated on synthetic data. - Motivation: operator variability and time-consuming post‑processing limit routine echocardiographic quantitative analysis and real‑time cine ultrasound requires low‑latency automated processing. - The study compares four U‑Net–based architectures spanning single‑frame and temporal designs: a 2D baseline, a 2.5D stacked‑frame model, a 3D volumetric model, and a ConvLSTM variant, with systematic ablation experiments. - Synthetic datasets: the segmentation corpus included 1,200 synthetic frames and the SWE corpus included 900 synthetic velocity‑field cases; evaluation was performed entirely on synthetic reference corpora. - The SWE branch implemented Radon‑transform–based propagation‑direction estimation, time‑domain shear‑wave speed estimation, and configurable temporal stabilization on synthetic velocity fields. - Key segmentation results on synthetic evaluation metrics: ConvLSTM achieved Dice 0.994 and IoU 0.987, an 18.6% Dice improvement over the 2D baseline (Dice 0.808); a 2.5D model with a 3‑frame window reached Dice 0.983 with substantially lower latency (433 ms vs 1193 ms for the highest‑latency model). - Inference benchmarks after TensorRT FP16 export for the UNet2.5D segmentation model: 341 FPS on an RTX 3060 and 90.4 FPS on a Jetson Orin Nano, demonstrating edge deployment feasibility. - Temporal stabilization: penalized least‑squares smoothing (smoothn, λ=10) reduced shear‑wave speed coefficient of variation by 63.8% with a 2.7 ms latency overhead per frame and preserved edge features. - The work is explicitly a synthetic proof‑of‑concept; authors note that acquisition of real echocardiographic data and clinical validation are required before any clinical or deployment claims. - Data and code: all data produced are available on reasonable request; the manuscript used the CAMUS dataset for evaluation as noted, and the synthetic excitation and acquisition physics were not modeled here.
## Clinical Analysis & Structured Key Points
Myocardial Stiffness Tracking & Assessment Toolkit Driven by Artificial Intelligence For Reproducible Benchmarking of Temporal Segmentation and Shear-Wave Velocity Stabilization on Synthetic Data | medRxiv Skip to main content Myocardial Stiffness Tracking & Assessment Toolkit Driven by Artificial Intelligence For Reproducible Benchmarking of Temporal Segmentation and Shear-Wave Velocity Stabilization on Synthetic Data Terry Tsebro , Abdullah Safi , Bangcheng Wang , Luca Hutchison , Kamil Chaudhry , Laith Alzoubi , Mark Noge , Austin Hua , Nimish Ray , Antonin Chianale , Parham Baghban-Bashi , Meryem Karayunusoglu , Yimin Xu , Amar Saed , Wagih Ghobriel , Aimen Malik , Dennis D. Fernandes doi: https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.09.17.26363353 Terry Tsebro 1 University of Toronto; Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Abdullah Safi 1 University of Toronto; Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Bangcheng Wang 1 University of Toronto; Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Luca Hutchison 1 University of Toronto; Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Kamil Chaudhry 1 University of Toronto; Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Laith Alzoubi 1 University of Toronto; Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Mark Noge 1 University of Toronto; Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Austin Hua 1 University of Toronto; Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Nimish Ray 1 University of Toronto; Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Antonin Chianale 1 University of Toronto; Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Parham Baghban-Bashi 1 University of Toronto; Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Meryem Karayunusoglu 1 University of Toronto; Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Yimin Xu 2 Northeastern University; Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Amar Saed 1 University of Toronto; Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Wagih Ghobriel 1 University of Toronto; Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Aimen Malik 3 Yale University Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site For correspondence: aimen.malik{at}yale.edu Dennis D. Fernandes 2 Northeastern University; Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Abstract Info/History Metrics Data/Code Preview PDF Abstract Propose: Routine echocardiographic assessment can be affected by operator variability and time-consuming post-processing, which may limit rapid quantitative analysis. Real-time cine ultrasound demands low-latency automated processing for clinical usage. Existing approaches lack standardized evaluation frameworks, verified edge deployment, and structured reproducibility guarantees. To address these limitations, we built Myocardial Stiffness Tracking & Assessment Toolkit driven by Artificial Intelligence (MyoSTAT.AI). We report a deterministic, fully reproducible pipeline that performs real-time segmentation and SWE velocity estimation, evaluated entirely on synthetic data. Approach: Four U-Net-based architectures spanning single-frame and temporal designs were evaluated via systematic ablation: a 2D baseline, a 2.5D stacked-frame model, a 3D volumetric model, and a ConvLSTM variant. Experiments used synthetic reference corpora with split accounting the segmentation corpus contained 1,200 synthetic frames, and the SWE corpus contained 900 synthetic velocity-field cases. The SWE branch used Radon-transform-based propagation-direction estimation, time-domain shear-wave speed estimation, and configurable temporal stabilization on synthetic velocity fields. TensorRT FP16 deployment benchmarks were performed separately for the exported UNet2.5D segmentation model on RTX 3060 and Jetson Orin Nano hardware. Results: On the synthetic evaluation quantities, the ConvLSTM variant achieved the highest segmentation accuracy (Dice 0.994, IoU 0.987), an 18.6% improvement over the 2D baseline (Dice 0.808). A 2.5D model with a 3-frame temporal window achieved Dice 0.983 at substantially lower latency (433 ms vs. 1193 ms). TensorRT FP16 deployment yielded 341 FPS on the RTX 3060 and 90.4 FPS on the Jetson Orin Nano. Penalized least-squares temporal stabilization (smoothn, λ=10) reduced shear-wave speed CoV by 63.8% at 2.7 ms latency overhead per frame, with no loss of edge preservation. Conclusions: We demonstrate a deterministic, reproducible computational benchmarking framework for cardiac segmentation and SWE velocity-field stabilization, evaluated entirely on synthetic data, together with preliminary inference feasibility on workstation and embedded hardware. These results represent a synthetic proof-of-concept rather than a validated clinical or operator-independent tool; acquisition of real echocardiographic data and clinical validation are required before any claim of diagnostic or deployment readiness can be made. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Author Declarations I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained. Yes The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below: The present work operates on custom synthetic shear-wave velocity fields and estimates shear-wave speed developed for this work exclusively; the excitation source and acquisition physics are not modeled here and are required for real-data validation. We also used CAMUS dataset for evalution from https://www.creatis.insa-lyon.fr/Challenge/camus/ I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals. Yes I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance). Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable. Yes Data Availability All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors Copyright The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Back to top Previous Next Posted September 20, 2026. Download PDF Data/Code Email Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv. NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article. Your Email * Your Name * Send To * Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas. You are going to email the following Myocardial Stiffness Tracking & Assessment Toolkit Driven by Artificial Intelligence For Reproducible Benchmarking of Temporal Segmentation and Shear-Wave Velocity Stabilization on Synthetic Data Message Subject (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv Message Body (Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website. Your Personal Message CAPTCHA This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. Share Myocardial Stiffness Tracking & Assessment Toolkit Driven by Artificial Intelligence For Reproducible Benchmarking of Temporal Segmentation and Shear-Wave Velocity Stabilization on Synthetic Data Terry Tsebro , Abdullah Safi , Bangcheng Wang , Luca Hutchison , Kamil Chaudhry , Laith Alzoubi , Mark Noge , Austin Hua , Nimish Ray , Antonin Chianale , Parham Baghban-Bashi , Meryem Karayunusoglu , Yimin Xu , Amar Saed , Wagih Ghobriel , Aimen Malik , Dennis D. Fernandes medRxiv 2026.09.17.26363353; doi: https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.09.17.26363353 Share This Article: Copy Citation Tools Myocardial Stiffness Tracking & Assessment Toolkit Driven by Artificial Intelligence For Reproducible Benchmarking of Temporal Segmentation and Shear-Wave Velocity Stabilization on Synthetic Data Terry Tsebro , Abdullah Safi , Bangcheng Wang , Luca Hutchison , Kamil Chaudhry , Laith Alzoubi , Mark Noge , Austin Hua , Nimish Ray , Antonin Chianale , Parham Baghban-Bashi , Meryem Karayunusoglu , Yimin Xu , Amar Saed , Wagih Ghobriel , Aimen Malik , Dennis D. Fernandes medRxiv 2026.09.17.26363353; doi: https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.09.17.26363353 Citation Manager Formats BibTeX Bookends EasyBib EndNote (tagged) EndNote 8 (xml) Medlars Mendeley Papers RefWorks Tagged Ref Manager RIS Zotero Tweet Widget Facebook Like Google Plus One Subject Area Radiology and Imaging Subject Areas All Articles Addiction Medicine (619) Allergy and Immunology (903) Anesthesia (334) Cardiovascular Medicine (4825) Dentistry and Oral Medicine (479) Dermatology (418) Emergency Medicine (651) Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (1633) Epidemiology (15970) Forensic Medicine (33) Gastroenterology (1206) Genetic and Genomic Medicine (7060) Geriatric Medicine (734) Health Economics (1066) Health Informatics (5058) Health Policy (1436) Health Systems and Quality Improvement (1775) Hematology (587) HIV/AIDS (1347) Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (16302) Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (1174) Medical Education (671) Medical Ethics (155) Nephrology (727) Neurology (7290) Nursing (368) Nutrition (1084) Obstetrics and Gynecology (1243) Occupational and Environmental Health (1005) Oncology (3613) Ophthalmology (1055) Orthopedics (398) Otolaryngology (457) Pain Medicine (472) Palliative Medicine (139) Pathology (709) Pediatrics (1805) Pharmacology and Therapeutics (739) Primary Care Research (768) Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (5916) Public and Global Health (9769) Radiology and Imaging (2431) Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (1456) Respiratory Medicine (1249) Rheumatology (642) Sexual and Reproductive Health (773) Sports Medicine (579) Surgery (781) Toxicology (107) Transplantation (305) Urology (293)
## Related Clinical Research

- [Insulin promotes RAGE ectodomain shedding via AKT‑ and Rab14‑dependent ADAM10 trafficking in HAECs](https://medichelpline.com/clinical-feed/plos-one-22-insulin-enhances-rage-ectodomain-shedding-by-inducing-rab14-dependent-adam10.md)
- [Fish oil plus metformin for vascular and cardiac health in women with PMOS: protocol for a randomi](https://medichelpline.com/clinical-feed/bmj-open-6-effect-of-fish-oil-as-an-adjunct-therapy-to-metformin-on-vascular-and-cardiac.md)
- [Real-World Marijuana Use Linked to Altered Nocturnal Cardiac Autonomic Function and Poorer Sleep](https://medichelpline.com/clinical-feed/medrxiv-15-real-world-marijuana-use-is-associated-with-altered-nocturnal-cardiac-autonomic.md)
- [Gut Microbiome Biomarkers Associated with Primary VT/VF in STEMI Identified by Machine Learning](https://medichelpline.com/clinical-feed/medrxiv-22-machine-learning-approach-to-identify-gut-microbiota-biomarkers-in-patients.md)
- [Retinal changes on OCT may predict atrial fibrillation risk years before diagnosis](https://medichelpline.com/clinical-feed/medical-news-today-0-how-changes-in-the-eyes-may-help-spot-afib-risk-years-early.md)

## Navigation
- [← Back to Cardiology Feed](https://medichelpline.com/clinical-feed/cardiology.md)
- [← All Clinical Specialties](https://medichelpline.com/clinical-feed.md)
## Medical & Regulatory Disclaimer

> [!CAUTION]
> MedicHelpline content is structured for research, educational, and professional discovery purposes. It does not constitute individual medical advice, clinical diagnosis, or treatment recommendations.
> Always verify dosing, contraindications, and regulatory alerts against official product labeling and primary regulatory sources before clinical decision-making.