---
title: "CES-D-10 thresholds may misclassify depression in older adults: findings from ASPREE-XT"
id: "medrxiv-21-the-measure-and-mismeasure-of-depression-in-older-adults"
canonical_url: "https://medichelpline.com/clinical-feed/medrxiv-21-the-measure-and-mismeasure-of-depression-in-older-adults"
content_type: "clinical_feed_article"
specialty: "General"
source_name: "medRxiv (Clinical Preprints)"
source_url: "https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.07.29.26359110v1?rss=1"
published_at: "2026-07-31T12:00:00.000Z"
evidence_level: "Verified Feed"
license: "CC-BY-NC-4.0 / Informational Use"
---
# CES-D-10 thresholds may misclassify depression in older adults: findings from ASPREE-XT
## Provenance & Clinical Metadata
- **Canonical URL:** https://medichelpline.com/clinical-feed/medrxiv-21-the-measure-and-mismeasure-of-depression-in-older-adults
- **Specialty:** [General](https://medichelpline.com/clinical-feed/general.md)
- **Primary Source:** medRxiv (Clinical Preprints)
- **Source URL:** [Original Journal Publication](https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.07.29.26359110v1?rss=1)
- **Published At:** 2026-07-31T12:00:00.000Z
- **Evidence Rating:** Verified Feed
## Executive GIST (TL;DR)
- Objective: Evaluate whether CES-D-10 threshold scores (≥8 and ≥10) used to indicate clinically significant symptoms or probable depression reflect core affective features of major depressive episodes in older adults. - Design and dataset: Descriptive analysis of repeated CES-D-10 assessments from the ASPREE-XT longitudinal cohort, drawn from the ASPREE trial follow-up, including 19,114 participants and up to 13 years of observation. - Exposure/thresholds: The study identified observations meeting 'probable depression' defined as **CES-D-10** sum score ≥ 8 (the paper notes both ≥8 and ≥10 have been used in prior studies; analysis focused on ≥8 observations). - Key items examined: Item 3 ("I felt depressed") and item 8 ("I was happy") were inspected to determine presence of core depressed mood and preserved happiness within threshold-positive observations. - Primary outcome: Proportion of CES-D-10 threshold-positive observations with minimally depressed mood together with preserved happiness. - Main result: Across 13 years, 27,417 observations met the CES-D-10 ≥ 8 threshold. Of these, 13,356 observations (48.7%) showed minimally depressed mood and preserved happiness. - Interpretation: A substantial proportion of observations labeled as 'probable depression' by CES-D-10 sum scores lacked core depressed mood and retained happiness, suggesting sum scores may not reliably proxy **major depressive disorder** in older adults. - Recommendation/implication: Use of CES-D-10 sum scores as a stand-alone indicator for major depression in older adults should be approached with caution. - Data and ethics: Individual participant data are not publicly available due to privacy and consent restrictions; aggregate results are reported. The ASPREE and ASPREE-XT studies had ethics approvals at participating sites and obtained informed consent from participants or surrogates. - Preprint status and limitations: This is a medRxiv preprint that has not been peer reviewed; the source does not report additional methodological limitations or diagnostic validation against structured clinical interviews within the provided text.
## Clinical Analysis & Structured Key Points
The measure and mismeasure of depression in older adults | medRxiv Skip to main content The measure and mismeasure of depression in older adults View ORCID Profile Malcolm P Forbes , John J. J McNeil , Michael Berk doi: https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.07.29.26359110 Malcolm P Forbes 1 Barwon Health; Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Malcolm P Forbes For correspondence: malcolmpforbes{at}gmail.com John J. J McNeil 2 Monash University; Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Michael Berk 3 Deakin University Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Abstract Info/History Metrics Data/Code Preview PDF Abstract Objectives: The 10-item Centre for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D-10) has been used in cohort studies with scores of >= 8 and >= 10 used to indicate clinically significant symptoms or probable depression. We examined whether observations crossing these thresholds displayed core affective features expected in individuals who might be suffering with a clinically significant major depressive episode. Methods: This was a descriptive analysis of repeated CES-D-10 assessments in the ASPirin in Reducing Events in the Elderly eXTension (ASPREE-XT) longitudinal cohort study of 19,114 participants. We identified observations of 'probable depression', defined as a CES-D-10 score >= 8 and then examined scores on item 3 ("I felt depressed") and item 8 ("I was happy"). The primary outcome was the proportion of threshold-positive CES-D-10 observations with minimally depressed mood and preserved happiness. Results: Over 13 years, 27,417 observations met the threshold of CES-D-10 >= 8. Of these, 13,356 observations (48.7%) had minimally depressed mood and preserved happiness. Conclusion: A substantial proportion of observations considered 'probable depression' had little or no depressed mood, together with preserved happiness. CES-D-10 sum scores should be used with caution as a proxy for major depressive disorder in older adults. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Clinical Trial NCT07224347 Author Declarations I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained. Yes The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below: The ASPREE trial was approved by the relevant ethics committee or institutional review board at each participating site in Australia and the United States. Primary Australian ethics approval was granted by the Monash University Human Research Ethics Committee. The ASPREE-XT observational follow-up study received primary Australian ethics approval from the Alfred Hospital Ethics Committee, with secondary approvals from the Human Research Ethics Committee (Tasmania) Network, Monash University Human Research Ethics Committee, ACT Health Human Research Ethics Committee, and the University of Adelaide Human Research Ethics Committee. The studies were conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and applicable national ethical guidelines. All ASPREE participants provided written informed consent, and informed consent for ASPREE-XT was obtained from participants or their appointed surrogates, where applicable. I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals. Yes I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance). Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable. Yes Data Availability The aggregate results generated in this study are reported in the manuscript. Individual-participant data from ASPREE and ASPREE-XT are not publicly available because of participant privacy and consent restrictions. Data may be made available to qualified researchers upon reasonable request through the ASPREE Access Management System, subject to approval by the ASPREE Principal Investigators and completion of a data-sharing agreement. Copyright The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC 4.0 International license . Back to top Previous Next Posted July 31, 2026. Download PDF Data/Code Email Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv. NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article. Your Email * Your Name * Send To * Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas. You are going to email the following The measure and mismeasure of depression in older adults Message Subject (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv Message Body (Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website. Your Personal Message CAPTCHA This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. Share The measure and mismeasure of depression in older adults Malcolm P Forbes , John J. J McNeil , Michael Berk medRxiv 2026.07.29.26359110; doi: https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.07.29.26359110 Share This Article: Copy Citation Tools The measure and mismeasure of depression in older adults Malcolm P Forbes , John J. J McNeil , Michael Berk medRxiv 2026.07.29.26359110; doi: https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.07.29.26359110 Citation Manager Formats BibTeX Bookends EasyBib EndNote (tagged) EndNote 8 (xml) Medlars Mendeley Papers RefWorks Tagged Ref Manager RIS Zotero Tweet Widget Facebook Like Google Plus One Subject Area Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology Subject Areas All Articles Addiction Medicine (594) Allergy and Immunology (887) Anesthesia (321) Cardiovascular Medicine (4671) Dentistry and Oral Medicine (465) Dermatology (400) Emergency Medicine (630) Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (1591) Epidemiology (15634) Forensic Medicine (32) Gastroenterology (1175) Genetic and Genomic Medicine (6866) Geriatric Medicine (713) Health Economics (1032) Health Informatics (4842) Health Policy (1411) Health Systems and Quality Improvement (1692) Hematology (568) HIV/AIDS (1302) Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (16140) Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (1141) Medical Education (649) Medical Ethics (148) Nephrology (702) Neurology (7013) Nursing (357) Nutrition (1055) Obstetrics and Gynecology (1205) Occupational and Environmental Health (985) Oncology (3503) Ophthalmology (1014) Orthopedics (381) Otolaryngology (432) Pain Medicine (453) Palliative Medicine (135) Pathology (695) Pediatrics (1752) Pharmacology and Therapeutics (722) Primary Care Research (750) Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (5711) Public and Global Health (9533) Radiology and Imaging (2320) Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (1406) Respiratory Medicine (1227) Rheumatology (624) Sexual and Reproductive Health (755) Sports Medicine (566) Surgery (750) Toxicology (105) Transplantation (296) Urology (276)
## Related Clinical Research

- [Prevalence of cognitive impairment in older Palestinian adults in community and nursing homes](https://medichelpline.com/clinical-feed/plos-one-16-prevalence-of-cognitive-impairment-among-older-adult-palestinians-in-community.md)
- [Bupropion Hydrochloride for Improving Recovery in Acute Ischaemic Stroke: BASE Trial Protocol](https://medichelpline.com/clinical-feed/bmj-open-4-protocol-for-base-a-multicentre-double-blind-randomised-controlled-trial-of.md)
- [First‑trimester maternal cfRNA (MaiRa) outperforms FMF combined screening for early‑onset preeclam](https://medichelpline.com/clinical-feed/medrxiv-5-maternal-cell-free-rna-versus-combined-screening-for-first-trimester-prediction.md)
- [Health-literate hand surgery care: patient education and PROM feedback priorities from a co-design](https://medichelpline.com/clinical-feed/medrxiv-1-co-designing-health-literate-hand-surgery-care-qualitative-priorities-for.md)
- [Adjusting unmet need for contraception by including husband’s virility in the Revised algorithm](https://medichelpline.com/clinical-feed/plos-one-2-incorporating-husband-s-influence-in-estimating-unmet-need-for-contraception.md)

## Navigation
- [← Back to General Feed](https://medichelpline.com/clinical-feed/general.md)
- [← All Clinical Specialties](https://medichelpline.com/clinical-feed.md)
## Medical & Regulatory Disclaimer

> [!CAUTION]
> MedicHelpline content is structured for research, educational, and professional discovery purposes. It does not constitute individual medical advice, clinical diagnosis, or treatment recommendations.
> Always verify dosing, contraindications, and regulatory alerts against official product labeling and primary regulatory sources before clinical decision-making.