---
title: "Comparison of Acoustic Feature Extraction: CSL Versus LIS-N Web Prototype (Praat-Parselmouth)"
id: "medrxiv-21-a-comparative-study-of-acoustic-feature-extraction-using-csl-and-web-prototype"
canonical_url: "https://medichelpline.com/clinical-feed/medrxiv-21-a-comparative-study-of-acoustic-feature-extraction-using-csl-and-web-prototype"
content_type: "clinical_feed_article"
specialty: "General"
source_name: "medRxiv (Clinical Preprints)"
source_url: "https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.14.26362731v1?rss=1"
published_at: "2026-09-21T12:00:00.000Z"
evidence_level: "Verified Feed"
license: "CC-BY-NC-4.0 / Informational Use"
---
# Comparison of Acoustic Feature Extraction: CSL Versus LIS-N Web Prototype (Praat-Parselmouth)
## Provenance & Clinical Metadata
- **Canonical URL:** https://medichelpline.com/clinical-feed/medrxiv-21-a-comparative-study-of-acoustic-feature-extraction-using-csl-and-web-prototype
- **Specialty:** [General](https://medichelpline.com/clinical-feed/general.md)
- **Primary Source:** medRxiv (Clinical Preprints)
- **Source URL:** [Original Journal Publication](https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.14.26362731v1?rss=1)
- **Published At:** 2026-09-21T12:00:00.000Z
- **Evidence Rating:** Verified Feed
## Executive GIST (TL;DR)
- This preprint compares a clinical reference acoustic analysis system, **Computerized Speech Lab (CSL)**, with a web-based prototype named **LIS-N** that uses the open-source **Praat-Parselmouth** library for acoustic feature extraction. - Twenty adult volunteers without voice complaints completed three voice tasks (Rainbow Passage, sustained vowel /i/, and maximum phonation time /a/) on three consecutive days; audio was captured concurrently by CSL and the LIS-N prototype in quiet isolated rooms. - Four cross-system conditions were tested to separate the effects of recording hardware and analysis software on extracted features. - Agreement between systems was measured with **Pearson correlation** and **Bland–Altman** analyses; session-to-session trajectory correlations assessed longitudinal consistency. - **Fundamental frequency (F0)** and **Pitch Mean** showed excellent agreement across tasks and conditions (r > 0.98) and were robust to hardware and software differences. - Pitch Minimum and Pitch Maximum showed strong agreement specifically during sustained vowel tasks. - Energy-based features had only moderate agreement; variability was driven primarily by microphone differences, and same-microphone comparisons produced substantially stronger agreement for energy measures. - Perturbation measures — **jitter**, **shimmer**, and **CPP** — exhibited consistently poor cross-platform agreement, aligning with prior literature. - Authors conclude that open-source acoustic frameworks can be viable accessible alternatives to proprietary systems for frequency-based measures and longitudinal monitoring, but that systems should be interpreted separately because each is reliable within its own framework. - Study ethics: Institutional Review Board of the University of South Florida deemed the study exempt and not human research subject; participant consent and reporting guidelines were followed. - Data are not publicly available due to participant privacy and confidentiality; access limited to the approved study team and governed by institutional requirements. - Funders declared: NIH Common Fund (OT2-OD032720-01S3) and University of South Florida.
## Clinical Analysis & Structured Key Points
A Comparative Study of Acoustic Feature Extraction Using CSL and Web Prototype of LIS-N Application | medRxiv Skip to main content A Comparative Study of Acoustic Feature Extraction Using CSL and Web Prototype of LIS-N Application Shrramana Ganesh Sudhakar , Sabrina Musteric , Stephanie Watts , Mohamed Ebraheem , John Michael Templeton , Bridge2AI-Voice Consortium , Yael Bensoussan doi: https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.09.14.26362731 Shrramana Ganesh Sudhakar 1 University of South Florida; Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site For correspondence: sg38{at}usf.edu Sabrina Musteric 1 University of South Florida; Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Stephanie Watts 1 University of South Florida; Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Mohamed Ebraheem 1 University of South Florida; Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site John Michael Templeton 1 University of South Florida; Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site 2 - Yael Bensoussan 1 University of South Florida; Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Abstract Info/History Metrics Data/Code Preview PDF Abstract Purpose: Conventional clinical acoustic analysis systems are confined to specialized clinical environments, which limits scalable and remote voice monitoring. This study aimed to validate LIS-N, a web-based prototype of a novel mobile application that uses the open-source Praat-Parselmouth library for acoustic feature extraction, against the Computerized Speech Lab (CSL), the clinical reference standard, to assess its potential for telehealth and longitudinal voice assessment before integration into clinical or research workflows. Method: Twenty adult volunteers without voice complaints or diagnosed dysphonia completed three voice tasks across three consecutive days at a tertiary academic voice center in quiet isolated rooms. All participants completed the full protocol across three consecutive days. Voice tasks included Rainbow Passage reading, sustained vowel /i/, and maximum phonation time /a/. Audio was captured concurrently using CSL and the LIS-N prototype, which uses Praat-Parselmouth for acoustic feature extraction. To isolate the contributions of recording hardware and analysis software, four cross-system conditions were also examined. Agreement was assessed using Pearson correlation and Bland-Altman analyses. Session-to-session trajectory correlations were computed to evaluate temporal consistency across systems. Results: Fundamental frequency and Pitch Mean demonstrated excellent agreement across all tasks and conditions (r > 0.98), with robustness to hardware and software differences. Pitch Minimum and Pitch Maximum showed strong agreement during sustained vowel tasks. Energy-based features showed moderate agreement, with variability driven primarily by microphone differences, and same-microphone conditions yielded substantially stronger energy agreement. Perturbation measures including jitter, shimmer and CPP showed consistently poor cross-platform agreement, consistent with prior literature. Conclusion: This study provides proof of concept for the viability of open-source acoustic frameworks as accessible alternatives to proprietary clinical systems, while also identifying limitations. Both systems should be interpreted separately, as each remains reliable within its own framework. The LIS-N prototype demonstrated strong agreement for frequency-based voice measures and consistent longitudinal monitoring, supporting adoption of open-source acoustic tools in telehealth and remote voice monitoring. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Author Declarations I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained. Yes The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below: Institutional Review Board of the University of South Florida deemed this study exempt and Not Human Research Subject I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals. Yes I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance). Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable. Yes Data Availability The data supporting the findings of this study are not publicly available due to participant privacy and confidentiality restrictions. Data access is limited to the approved study team and governed by institutional review requirements. Funder Information Declared NIH Common Fund, https://ror.org/001d55x84 , OT2-OD032720-01S3 University of South Florida, https://ror.org/032db5x82 Copyright The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license . Back to top Previous Next Posted September 21, 2026. Download PDF Data/Code Email Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv. NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article. Your Email * Your Name * Send To * Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas. You are going to email the following A Comparative Study of Acoustic Feature Extraction Using CSL and Web Prototype of LIS-N Application Message Subject (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv Message Body (Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website. Your Personal Message CAPTCHA This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. Share A Comparative Study of Acoustic Feature Extraction Using CSL and Web Prototype of LIS-N Application Shrramana Ganesh Sudhakar , Sabrina Musteric , Stephanie Watts , Mohamed Ebraheem , John Michael Templeton , Bridge2AI-Voice Consortium , Yael Bensoussan medRxiv 2026.09.14.26362731; doi: https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.09.14.26362731 Share This Article: Copy Citation Tools A Comparative Study of Acoustic Feature Extraction Using CSL and Web Prototype of LIS-N Application Shrramana Ganesh Sudhakar , Sabrina Musteric , Stephanie Watts , Mohamed Ebraheem , John Michael Templeton , Bridge2AI-Voice Consortium , Yael Bensoussan medRxiv 2026.09.14.26362731; doi: https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.09.14.26362731 Citation Manager Formats BibTeX Bookends EasyBib EndNote (tagged) EndNote 8 (xml) Medlars Mendeley Papers RefWorks Tagged Ref Manager RIS Zotero Tweet Widget Facebook Like Google Plus One Subject Area Otolaryngology Subject Areas All Articles Addiction Medicine (619) Allergy and Immunology (903) Anesthesia (335) Cardiovascular Medicine (4832) Dentistry and Oral Medicine (479) Dermatology (419) Emergency Medicine (651) Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (1633) Epidemiology (15979) Forensic Medicine (33) Gastroenterology (1206) Genetic and Genomic Medicine (7067) Geriatric Medicine (734) Health Economics (1067) Health Informatics (5060) Health Policy (1438) Health Systems and Quality Improvement (1775) Hematology (587) HIV/AIDS (1347) Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (16309) Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (1175) Medical Education (671) Medical Ethics (155) Nephrology (727) Neurology (7294) Nursing (368) Nutrition (1084) Obstetrics and Gynecology (1244) Occupational and Environmental Health (1006) Oncology (3616) Ophthalmology (1055) Orthopedics (398) Otolaryngology (458) Pain Medicine (474) Palliative Medicine (139) Pathology (709) Pediatrics (1805) Pharmacology and Therapeutics (739) Primary Care Research (768) Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (5921) Public and Global Health (9772) Radiology and Imaging (2433) Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (1456) Respiratory Medicine (1250) Rheumatology (643) Sexual and Reproductive Health (773) Sports Medicine (581) Surgery (782) Toxicology (107) Transplantation (305) Urology (293)
## Related Clinical Research

- [Feasibility of a Smartphone EMA App to Capture Occupational Violence Among Nurses and Midwives](https://medichelpline.com/clinical-feed/medrxiv-2-testing-the-feasibility-of-a-smartphone-application-for-collecting-data-on.md)
- [Federated learning deployed in a regulator‑audited secure processing environment across multiple h](https://medichelpline.com/clinical-feed/medrxiv-20-federated-learning-in-a-regulator-audited-secure-processing-environment-a-multi.md)
- [Piezo1 membrane feedback drives self-organization into finite clusters](https://medichelpline.com/clinical-feed/biorxiv-13-recursive-feedback-between-piezo1-conformation-and-membrane-mechanics-drives.md)
- [Jehovah’s Witnesses permit blood-derived products but keep ban on whole-blood transfusions](https://medichelpline.com/clinical-feed/stat-news-0-jehovah-s-witnesses-allow-blood-derived-products-but-keep-ban-on-whole-blood.md)
- [8-hour time-restricted eating yields greater weight loss but not consistent blood pressure benefits](https://medichelpline.com/clinical-feed/medical-news-today-0-16-8-intermittent-fasting-best-for-weight-loss-but-not-for-blood-pressure.md)

## Navigation
- [← Back to General Feed](https://medichelpline.com/clinical-feed/general.md)
- [← All Clinical Specialties](https://medichelpline.com/clinical-feed.md)
## Medical & Regulatory Disclaimer

> [!CAUTION]
> MedicHelpline content is structured for research, educational, and professional discovery purposes. It does not constitute individual medical advice, clinical diagnosis, or treatment recommendations.
> Always verify dosing, contraindications, and regulatory alerts against official product labeling and primary regulatory sources before clinical decision-making.