---
title: "Hotspotters trial process evaluation: lessons on implementing integrated proactive care for patien"
id: "medrxiv-12-lessons-learned-from-a-trial-on-integrated-and-proactive-care-for-patients-with"
canonical_url: "https://medichelpline.com/clinical-feed/medrxiv-12-lessons-learned-from-a-trial-on-integrated-and-proactive-care-for-patients-with"
content_type: "clinical_feed_article"
specialty: "General"
source_name: "medRxiv (Clinical Preprints)"
source_url: "https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.15.26362413v1?rss=1"
published_at: "2026-09-21T12:00:00.000Z"
evidence_level: "Verified Feed"
license: "CC-BY-NC-4.0 / Informational Use"
---
# Hotspotters trial process evaluation: lessons on implementing integrated proactive care for patien
## Provenance & Clinical Metadata
- **Canonical URL:** https://medichelpline.com/clinical-feed/medrxiv-12-lessons-learned-from-a-trial-on-integrated-and-proactive-care-for-patients-with
- **Specialty:** [General](https://medichelpline.com/clinical-feed/general.md)
- **Primary Source:** medRxiv (Clinical Preprints)
- **Source URL:** [Original Journal Publication](https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.15.26362413v1?rss=1)
- **Published At:** 2026-09-21T12:00:00.000Z
- **Evidence Rating:** Verified Feed
## Executive GIST (TL;DR)
- The Hotspotters Project evaluated a **proactive integrated care** intervention for adults with complex needs who use acute care frequently, using a mixed-methods **RE-AIM** process evaluation. - Methods combined validated questionnaires, routine care data and semi-structured interviews; quantitative analysis was descriptive and qualitative analysis used inductive thematic content analysis. - Fewer patients than expected met eligibility criteria (153 of 1,403 screened), and enrollment was low (n=30), limiting conclusions about effectiveness and preventing cost-effectiveness assessment. - The intervention improved collaboration with **social work** and the structured intake was appreciated for creating an overview of patients’ multiple life-domain problems. - Despite a complex inclusion procedure, many practices integrated the intervention into routine care, indicating adoption and potential sustainability at practice level. - Care providers identified implementation barriers: the inclusion definition and recruitment methods did not align well with the Dutch context and increased burden on patients and staff. - Authors recommend adapting the target population definition, simplifying recruitment, and reducing study burden to better match local context and enhance patient motivation and trial feasibility. - Ethical approval was granted by the Leiden University Medical Center Ethics Committee; the trial is registered (NCT05878054).
## Clinical Analysis & Structured Key Points
Lessons learned from a trial on integrated and proactive care for patients with complex needs (Hotspotters project): a process evaluation | medRxiv Skip to main content Lessons learned from a trial on integrated and proactive care for patients with complex needs (Hotspotters project): a process evaluation View ORCID Profile Vera Tiemes , Marije Verdonk , View ORCID Profile Mark Van Der Wel , View ORCID Profile Marieke Adriaanse , View ORCID Profile Laurens Van Gestel , Marco Ephraim , View ORCID Profile Sytske Van Bruggen , View ORCID Profile Marc Bruijnzeels , View ORCID Profile Mattijs Numans , View ORCID Profile Hanneke Borgdorff , View ORCID Profile Rimke C Vos doi: https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.09.15.26362413 Vera Tiemes 1 Leiden University Medical Center; Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Vera Tiemes For correspondence: v.tiemes{at}lumc.nl Marije Verdonk 1 Leiden University Medical Center; Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Mark Van Der Wel 2 Radboud Institute of Health Sciences, Radboud University Nijmegen. Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Mark Van Der Wel Marieke Adriaanse 1 Leiden University Medical Center; Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Marieke Adriaanse Laurens Van Gestel 1 Leiden University Medical Center; Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Laurens Van Gestel Marco Ephraim 1 Leiden University Medical Center; Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Sytske Van Bruggen 1 Leiden University Medical Center; Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Sytske Van Bruggen Marc Bruijnzeels 1 Leiden University Medical Center; Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Marc Bruijnzeels Mattijs Numans 1 Leiden University Medical Center; Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Mattijs Numans Hanneke Borgdorff 1 Leiden University Medical Center; Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Hanneke Borgdorff Rimke C Vos 1 Leiden University Medical Center; Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Rimke C Vos Abstract Info/History Metrics Data/Code Preview PDF Abstract Background: This study focused on adults with complex care needs due to problems on multiple life domains and consequent high acute care use. The Hotspotters Project was undertaken to assess the effects of proactive integrated care on health outcomes and healthcare costs in this group. We evaluated the reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation and maintenance (RE-AIM) of the Hotspotters Project in order to identify factors that influenced implementation and outcomes. Method: This mixed method study followed the RE-AIM-framework, using validated questionnaires, routine care data and semi-structured interviews. Qualitative data from patients and care providers offered insight in the quantitative outcomes. Quantitative data were analyzed descriptively (SPSS), and interview transcripts were analyzed using inductive thematic content analysis (Atlas.ti). Results: As acute care use was lower than expected, few patients were eligible (153/1403) and subsequent low enrollment (n=30) limited conclusions regarding effectiveness. Nevertheless, the intervention improved collaboration with social work, and the structured intake was valued for the overview of patients complex needs. Many practices adopted the intervention into regular care, despite the complex inclusion process. Care providers proposed revising the target population and recruitment to better reflect the Dutch context. Conclusion: Although cost-effectiveness could not be assessed, this study nonetheless provides insights that can help future interventions and trials to better match patients needs, adapt to local context and reduce patients study burden. Adapting the definition of patients with complex needs to a local context can strengthen the rationale for implementation and enhance patient motivation. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Clinical Trial NCT05878054 Author Declarations I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained. Yes The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below: The Ethics committee of the Leiden University Medical Center gave ethical approval for this work (METC-LDD, P21.123). I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals. Yes I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance). Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable. Yes Data Availability The participants of this study did not give written consent for their data to be shared publicly. Funder Information Declared The Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (ZonMW) , 80-85200-98-210 Stichting Fonds Huisartsen in Achterstandswijken Haaglanden , n/a Stichting Achtertandswijken Nijmegen , n/a Menzis Zorgverzekeraar n.v. , n/a CZ Zorgverzekeraar n.v. , n/a Copyright The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC 4.0 International license . Back to top Previous Next Posted September 21, 2026. Download PDF Data/Code Email Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv. NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article. Your Email * Your Name * Send To * Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas. You are going to email the following Lessons learned from a trial on integrated and proactive care for patients with complex needs (Hotspotters project): a process evaluation Message Subject (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv Message Body (Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website. Your Personal Message CAPTCHA This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. Share Lessons learned from a trial on integrated and proactive care for patients with complex needs (Hotspotters project): a process evaluation Vera Tiemes , Marije Verdonk , Mark Van Der Wel , Marieke Adriaanse , Laurens Van Gestel , Marco Ephraim , Sytske Van Bruggen , Marc Bruijnzeels , Mattijs Numans , Hanneke Borgdorff , Rimke C Vos medRxiv 2026.09.15.26362413; doi: https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.09.15.26362413 Share This Article: Copy Citation Tools Lessons learned from a trial on integrated and proactive care for patients with complex needs (Hotspotters project): a process evaluation Vera Tiemes , Marije Verdonk , Mark Van Der Wel , Marieke Adriaanse , Laurens Van Gestel , Marco Ephraim , Sytske Van Bruggen , Marc Bruijnzeels , Mattijs Numans , Hanneke Borgdorff , Rimke C Vos medRxiv 2026.09.15.26362413; doi: https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.09.15.26362413 Citation Manager Formats BibTeX Bookends EasyBib EndNote (tagged) EndNote 8 (xml) Medlars Mendeley Papers RefWorks Tagged Ref Manager RIS Zotero Tweet Widget Facebook Like Google Plus One Subject Area Primary Care Research Subject Areas All Articles Addiction Medicine (619) Allergy and Immunology (903) Anesthesia (335) Cardiovascular Medicine (4832) Dentistry and Oral Medicine (479) Dermatology (419) Emergency Medicine (651) Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (1633) Epidemiology (15980) Forensic Medicine (33) Gastroenterology (1206) Genetic and Genomic Medicine (7067) Geriatric Medicine (734) Health Economics (1067) Health Informatics (5061) Health Policy (1438) Health Systems and Quality Improvement (1776) Hematology (587) HIV/AIDS (1347) Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (16310) Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (1176) Medical Education (671) Medical Ethics (155) Nephrology (727) Neurology (7294) Nursing (369) Nutrition (1084) Obstetrics and Gynecology (1244) Occupational and Environmental Health (1006) Oncology (3617) Ophthalmology (1055) Orthopedics (398) Otolaryngology (458) Pain Medicine (474) Palliative Medicine (140) Pathology (709) Pediatrics (1805) Pharmacology and Therapeutics (739) Primary Care Research (769) Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (5921) Public and Global Health (9772) Radiology and Imaging (2433) Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (1456) Respiratory Medicine (1250) Rheumatology (643) Sexual and Reproductive Health (773) Sports Medicine (581) Surgery (783) Toxicology (107) Transplantation (305) Urology (293)
## Related Clinical Research

- [Global bibliometric analysis of Breaking Bad News research (2000–2025): trends and priorities](https://medichelpline.com/clinical-feed/medrxiv-13-tracing-the-evolution-of-research-on-breaking-bad-news-a-global-analysis-of.md)
- [Heat Exposure and Nursing Performance: Protocol for a Repeated-Measures Cross-Over Simulation Study](https://medichelpline.com/clinical-feed/medrxiv-23-evaluating-nursing-performance-during-heatwave-simulations-protocol-for-a.md)
- [Piezo1 membrane feedback drives self-organization into finite clusters](https://medichelpline.com/clinical-feed/biorxiv-13-recursive-feedback-between-piezo1-conformation-and-membrane-mechanics-drives.md)
- [Jehovah’s Witnesses permit blood-derived products but keep ban on whole-blood transfusions](https://medichelpline.com/clinical-feed/stat-news-0-jehovah-s-witnesses-allow-blood-derived-products-but-keep-ban-on-whole-blood.md)
- [8-hour time-restricted eating yields greater weight loss but not consistent blood pressure benefits](https://medichelpline.com/clinical-feed/medical-news-today-0-16-8-intermittent-fasting-best-for-weight-loss-but-not-for-blood-pressure.md)

## Navigation
- [← Back to General Feed](https://medichelpline.com/clinical-feed/general.md)
- [← All Clinical Specialties](https://medichelpline.com/clinical-feed.md)
## Medical & Regulatory Disclaimer

> [!CAUTION]
> MedicHelpline content is structured for research, educational, and professional discovery purposes. It does not constitute individual medical advice, clinical diagnosis, or treatment recommendations.
> Always verify dosing, contraindications, and regulatory alerts against official product labeling and primary regulatory sources before clinical decision-making.