---
title: "MRI sequence comparison for optic nerve lesion detection in multiple sclerosis follow-up"
id: "medrxiv-8-comparison-of-mri-sequences-for-optic-nerve-lesion-detection-in-the-follow-up"
canonical_url: "https://medichelpline.com/clinical-feed/medrxiv-8-comparison-of-mri-sequences-for-optic-nerve-lesion-detection-in-the-follow-up"
content_type: "clinical_feed_article"
specialty: "Neurology"
source_name: "medRxiv (Clinical Preprints)"
source_url: "https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.08.24.26361188v1?rss=1"
published_at: "2026-08-27T12:00:00.000Z"
evidence_level: "Verified Feed"
license: "CC-BY-NC-4.0 / Informational Use"
---
# MRI sequence comparison for optic nerve lesion detection in multiple sclerosis follow-up
## Provenance & Clinical Metadata
- **Canonical URL:** https://medichelpline.com/clinical-feed/medrxiv-8-comparison-of-mri-sequences-for-optic-nerve-lesion-detection-in-the-follow-up
- **Specialty:** [Neurology](https://medichelpline.com/clinical-feed/neurology.md)
- **Primary Source:** medRxiv (Clinical Preprints)
- **Source URL:** [Original Journal Publication](https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.08.24.26361188v1?rss=1)
- **Published At:** 2026-08-27T12:00:00.000Z
- **Evidence Rating:** Verified Feed
## Executive GIST (TL;DR)
- The study compared three MRI sequences—**STIR**, **fat-suppressed FLAIR (fs-FLAIR)**, and **double inversion recovery (DIR)**—for detecting **optic nerve** lesions in patients with established **multiple sclerosis (MS)**. - Fifty-nine MS patients underwent MRI with all three sequences and received visual evoked potential (VEP) testing as a functional correlate. - Lesion detection was assessed independently for each sequence and compared against structural and functional standards (including VEP). - No significant differences in lesion detection were found among STIR, fs-FLAIR, and DIR; all three showed similar sensitivity to structural and functional changes. - Adding an orbit-specific sequence (STIR) provided limited incremental benefit over whole-brain sequences (fs-FLAIR, DIR) in the follow-up setting. - The authors conclude that routine follow-up MRI protocols in established MS may omit additional orbital sequences without losing diagnostic sensitivity, which can reduce scan time and patient burden. - Ethical approval was obtained from the Medical Research Council National Scientific and Ethical Committee (ETT TUKEB) and patient consent procedures were followed; data are available on request. - The preprint was posted on medRxiv and the authors declared no competing interests.
## Clinical Analysis & Structured Key Points
Comparison of MRI sequences for optic nerve lesion detection in the follow-up of multiple sclerosis | medRxiv Skip to main content Comparison of MRI sequences for optic nerve lesion detection in the follow-up of multiple sclerosis Mate Csomos , Magda Pribojszki , Brigitta Loczi , View ORCID Profile Bence Bozsik , View ORCID Profile Nikoletta Szabo , View ORCID Profile Peter Farago , View ORCID Profile Andras Kiraly , View ORCID Profile Daniel Vereb , Eszter Toth , View ORCID Profile Krisztian Kocsis , View ORCID Profile Krisztina Bencsik , View ORCID Profile Laszlo Vecsei , View ORCID Profile Zsigmond Tamas Kincses , View ORCID Profile Balint Kincses doi: https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.08.24.26361188 Mate Csomos 1 University of Szeged; Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Magda Pribojszki 1 University of Szeged; Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Brigitta Loczi 1 University of Szeged; Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Bence Bozsik 1 University of Szeged; Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Bence Bozsik Nikoletta Szabo 1 University of Szeged; Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Nikoletta Szabo Peter Farago 1 University of Szeged; Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Peter Farago Andras Kiraly 1 University of Szeged; Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Andras Kiraly Daniel Vereb 2 University of Szeged, Sahlgrenska University Hospital; Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Daniel Vereb Eszter Toth 1 University of Szeged; Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Krisztian Kocsis 1 University of Szeged; Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Krisztian Kocsis Krisztina Bencsik 1 University of Szeged; Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Krisztina Bencsik Laszlo Vecsei 3 University of Szeged, HUN-REN-SZTE Neuroscience Research Group; Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Laszlo Vecsei Zsigmond Tamas Kincses 1 University of Szeged; Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Zsigmond Tamas Kincses Balint Kincses 4 University Hospital Essen, University of Szeged Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Balint Kincses For correspondence: balint.kincses{at}uk-essen.de Abstract Info/History Metrics Supplementary material Data/Code Preview PDF Abstract Background: Optic nerve involvement is common in multiple sclerosis (MS) and is now recognized as a key site for dissemination in space under the most recent revision of McDonald′s criteria. Reliable detection of optic nerve lesions is essential for diagnosis and monitoring, yet the optimal MRI sequence remains uncertain. Objective: To compare the diagnostic performance of three MRI sequences - short tau inversion recovery (STIR), fat-suppressed FLAIR (fs-FLAIR), and double inversion recovery (DIR)- in detecting optic nerve lesions in MS patients. Methods: Fifty-nine MS patients underwent MRI with STIR, fs-FLAIR, and DIR sequences and visual evoked potential (VEP) testing. Lesion detection was assessed independently for each sequence, and results were compared to structural and functional standards. Results: No significant differences were found in lesion detection across the three sequences. All sequences showed similar sensitivity to structural and functional changes. The incremental benefit of adding orbita specific sequence to a whole-brain sequence was limited in the follow-up of MS. Conclusion: In patients with established MS, whole-brain sequences (fs-FLAIR, DIR) perform comparably to dedicated orbital sequences (STIR) in detecting optic nerve lesions. This supports the feasibility of MRI protocols by omitting additional orbital sequences in routine follow-up, thereby reducing scan time and patient burden without compromising diagnostic sensitivity. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Author Declarations I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained. Yes The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below: The Medical Research Council National Scientific and Ethical Committee (ETT TUKEB) of the National Institute of Pharmacy and Nutrition gave ethical approval for this work (000002/2016/OTIG). I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals. Yes I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance). Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable. Yes Data Availability All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors Funder Information Declared MTA-SZTE Neuroscience Research Group National Brain Research Programs, HUN , KTIA_13_NAP-A-II/20 EFOP, HUN , EFOP-3.6.1-16-2016-00008 National Research, Development and Innovation Office , No. K 139415 , No. FK 135870 Copyright The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license . Back to top Previous Next Posted August 27, 2026. Download PDF Supplementary Material Data/Code Email Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv. NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article. Your Email * Your Name * Send To * Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas. You are going to email the following Comparison of MRI sequences for optic nerve lesion detection in the follow-up of multiple sclerosis Message Subject (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv Message Body (Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website. Your Personal Message CAPTCHA This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. Share Comparison of MRI sequences for optic nerve lesion detection in the follow-up of multiple sclerosis Mate Csomos , Magda Pribojszki , Brigitta Loczi , Bence Bozsik , Nikoletta Szabo , Peter Farago , Andras Kiraly , Daniel Vereb , Eszter Toth , Krisztian Kocsis , Krisztina Bencsik , Laszlo Vecsei , Zsigmond Tamas Kincses , Balint Kincses medRxiv 2026.08.24.26361188; doi: https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.08.24.26361188 Share This Article: Copy Citation Tools Comparison of MRI sequences for optic nerve lesion detection in the follow-up of multiple sclerosis Mate Csomos , Magda Pribojszki , Brigitta Loczi , Bence Bozsik , Nikoletta Szabo , Peter Farago , Andras Kiraly , Daniel Vereb , Eszter Toth , Krisztian Kocsis , Krisztina Bencsik , Laszlo Vecsei , Zsigmond Tamas Kincses , Balint Kincses medRxiv 2026.08.24.26361188; doi: https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.08.24.26361188 Citation Manager Formats BibTeX Bookends EasyBib EndNote (tagged) EndNote 8 (xml) Medlars Mendeley Papers RefWorks Tagged Ref Manager RIS Zotero Tweet Widget Facebook Like Google Plus One Subject Areas All Articles Addiction Medicine (612) Allergy and Immunology (892) Anesthesia (325) Cardiovascular Medicine (4753) Dentistry and Oral Medicine (473) Dermatology (406) Emergency Medicine (639) Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (1610) Epidemiology (15796) Forensic Medicine (32) Gastroenterology (1194) Genetic and Genomic Medicine (6964) Geriatric Medicine (726) Health Economics (1050) Health Informatics (4957) Health Policy (1422) Health Systems and Quality Improvement (1730) Hematology (578) HIV/AIDS (1328) Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (16227) Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (1157) Medical Education (661) Medical Ethics (150) Nephrology (717) Neurology (7157) Nursing (360) Nutrition (1072) Obstetrics and Gynecology (1225) Occupational and Environmental Health (998) Oncology (3563) Ophthalmology (1032) Orthopedics (392) Otolaryngology (445) Pain Medicine (464) Palliative Medicine (139) Pathology (702) Pediatrics (1770) Pharmacology and Therapeutics (730) Primary Care Research (758) Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (5810) Public and Global Health (9664) Radiology and Imaging (2371) Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (1426) Respiratory Medicine (1236) Rheumatology (631) Sexual and Reproductive Health (762) Sports Medicine (571) Surgery (761) Toxicology (106) Transplantation (301) Urology (285)
## Related Clinical Research

- [2026 Stroke Rehabilitation Guideline: Start Early and Address Physical, Cognitive, and Mental Heal](https://medichelpline.com/clinical-feed/medical-news-today-0-stroke-rehab-guidelines-emphasize-early-support-for-physical-cognitive-and.md)
- [Childhood Maltreatment, Poor Sleep, and Fear of Relapse in Multiple Sclerosis: A Clinical Summary](https://medichelpline.com/clinical-feed/medrxiv-1-exploring-the-negative-triad-of-childhood-maltreatment-fear-of-relapse-and-low.md)
- [Ultragenyx Phase 3 failure: GTX-102 shows no benefit for Angelman syndrome](https://medichelpline.com/clinical-feed/stat-news-0-stat-ultragenyx-drug-to-treat-angelman-syndrome-a-rare-disease-fails-late-stage.md)
- [Hormone replacement therapy timing and menopause type linked to dementia risk in large UK study](https://medichelpline.com/clinical-feed/medical-news-today-1-menopause-type-and-hrt-timing-influence-dementia-risk-large-study-suggests.md)
- [Novartis scores multiple sclerosis outcome with BTK inhibitor](https://medichelpline.com/clinical-feed/stat-news-1-stat-novartis-gets-multiple-sclerosis-win-with-btk-inhibitor.md)

## Navigation
- [← Back to Neurology Feed](https://medichelpline.com/clinical-feed/neurology.md)
- [← All Clinical Specialties](https://medichelpline.com/clinical-feed.md)
## Medical & Regulatory Disclaimer

> [!CAUTION]
> MedicHelpline content is structured for research, educational, and professional discovery purposes. It does not constitute individual medical advice, clinical diagnosis, or treatment recommendations.
> Always verify dosing, contraindications, and regulatory alerts against official product labeling and primary regulatory sources before clinical decision-making.