---
title: "Reproducibility of Common Laboratory Tests to Improve Synthetic Data for Machine Learning"
id: "medrxiv-12-quantifying-reproducibility-of-common-laboratory-tests-in-a-tertiary-care"
canonical_url: "https://medichelpline.com/clinical-feed/medrxiv-12-quantifying-reproducibility-of-common-laboratory-tests-in-a-tertiary-care"
content_type: "clinical_feed_article"
specialty: "Pharmacology"
source_name: "medRxiv (Clinical Preprints)"
source_url: "https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.20.26366057v1?rss=1"
published_at: "2026-10-23T12:00:00.000Z"
evidence_level: "Verified Feed"
license: "CC-BY-NC-4.0 / Informational Use"
---
# Reproducibility of Common Laboratory Tests to Improve Synthetic Data for Machine Learning
## Provenance & Clinical Metadata
- **Canonical URL:** https://medichelpline.com/clinical-feed/medrxiv-12-quantifying-reproducibility-of-common-laboratory-tests-in-a-tertiary-care
- **Specialty:** [Pharmacology](https://medichelpline.com/clinical-feed/pharmacology.md)
- **Primary Source:** medRxiv (Clinical Preprints)
- **Source URL:** [Original Journal Publication](https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.20.26366057v1?rss=1)
- **Published At:** 2026-10-23T12:00:00.000Z
- **Evidence Rating:** Verified Feed
## Executive GIST (TL;DR)
- The study assessed how reproducible routine **laboratory tests** are in a tertiary care hospital to inform more realistic **synthetic data** generation for **machine learning**. - Investigators reported two main aims: quantify practical reproducibility ranges for labs and inform clinicians about real-world laboratory error bounds. - The article is a clinical preprint posted on medRxiv; the author is Dawson Dean III and the DOI is provided. - The University of Kentucky Medical Center ethics committee waived formal IRB approval for this work, according to the report. - Authors declared no competing interests. - The manuscript does not present detailed methods or explicit numeric reproducibility ranges in the abstract; those specifics are not reported in the source text. - Data that support the findings are available from the corresponding author on request, pending IRB approval, and the dataset is not publicly accessible because of privacy concerns. - The work frames limited medical-record sample sizes as a motivation for data augmentation using synthetic datasets, asking how much randomization remains realistic without compromising fidelity.
## Clinical Analysis & Structured Key Points
Quantifying Reproducibility of Common Laboratory Tests in a Tertiary Care Hospital for More Realistic Synthetic Data in Machine Learning | medRxiv Skip to main content Quantifying Reproducibility of Common Laboratory Tests in a Tertiary Care Hospital for More Realistic Synthetic Data in Machine Learning View ORCID Profile Dawson Dean III doi: https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.10.20.26366057 Dawson Dean III Univeristy of Kentucky Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Dawson Dean III For correspondence: vx2eqzjtewlevu72jj0qyy8nj5nn30f{at}qgtzyiphzetxhbwmkxmu.com Abstract Info/History Metrics Data/Code Preview PDF Abstract Data from medical records are often limited in size, creating challenges for Artificial Intelligence training, and an opportunity for data augmentation techniques to create synthetic data. A natural question is how much data can be randomized and still be realistic. The main goal of this study is to attempt to measure the reproducibility of labs drawn in practice, so these ranges can be used for generating more realistic synthetic data. A second goal is to inform clinicians of the real error ranges of their laboratory data so these values may be better interpreted. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Author Declarations I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained. Yes The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below: Ethics committee/IRB of University of Kentucky Medical Center waived ethical approval for this work I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals. Yes I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance). Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable. Yes Data Availability Data are available upon reasonable request. The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author, [DD] pending IRB approval. The data are not publicly available due to their containing information that could compromise the privacy of research participants Copyright The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Back to top Previous Next Posted October 23, 2026. Download PDF Data/Code Email Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv. NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article. Your Email * Your Name * Send To * Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas. You are going to email the following Quantifying Reproducibility of Common Laboratory Tests in a Tertiary Care Hospital for More Realistic Synthetic Data in Machine Learning Message Subject (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv Message Body (Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website. Your Personal Message CAPTCHA This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. Share Quantifying Reproducibility of Common Laboratory Tests in a Tertiary Care Hospital for More Realistic Synthetic Data in Machine Learning Dawson Dean III medRxiv 2026.10.20.26366057; doi: https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.10.20.26366057 Share This Article: Copy Citation Tools Quantifying Reproducibility of Common Laboratory Tests in a Tertiary Care Hospital for More Realistic Synthetic Data in Machine Learning Dawson Dean III medRxiv 2026.10.20.26366057; doi: https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.10.20.26366057 Citation Manager Formats BibTeX Bookends EasyBib EndNote (tagged) EndNote 8 (xml) Medlars Mendeley Papers RefWorks Tagged Ref Manager RIS Zotero Tweet Widget Facebook Like Google Plus One Subject Areas All Articles Addiction Medicine (634) Allergy and Immunology (914) Anesthesia (346) Cardiovascular Medicine (4943) Dentistry and Oral Medicine (490) Dermatology (425) Emergency Medicine (672) Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (1667) Epidemiology (16164) Forensic Medicine (35) Gastroenterology (1236) Genetic and Genomic Medicine (7213) Geriatric Medicine (747) Health Economics (1091) Health Informatics (5222) Health Policy (1456) Health Systems and Quality Improvement (1812) Hematology (597) HIV/AIDS (1370) Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (16427) Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (1192) Medical Education (690) Medical Ethics (156) Nephrology (739) Neurology (7499) Nursing (375) Nutrition (1114) Obstetrics and Gynecology (1281) Occupational and Environmental Health (1031) Oncology (3708) Ophthalmology (1079) Orthopedics (401) Otolaryngology (462) Pain Medicine (493) Palliative Medicine (142) Pathology (717) Pediatrics (1844) Pharmacology and Therapeutics (749) Primary Care Research (781) Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (6065) Public and Global Health (9915) Radiology and Imaging (2499) Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (1500) Respiratory Medicine (1263) Rheumatology (655) Sexual and Reproductive Health (794) Sports Medicine (594) Surgery (795) Toxicology (109) Transplantation (315) Urology (303)
## Related Clinical Research

- [Callio Therapeutics hires Chris Hassig as chief scientific officer](https://medichelpline.com/clinical-feed/stat-news-6-stat-up-and-down-the-ladder-the-latest-comings-and-goings.md)
- [U.S. Treasury Proposes Restricting Investment in Chinese Biotech Under COINS Rule](https://medichelpline.com/clinical-feed/stat-news-6-stat-treasury-proposes-major-restrictions-to-u-s-investment-in-chinese-biotech.md)
- [When Reconstruction Fails: Doubly Robust Mediation with Multimodal Representations](https://medichelpline.com/clinical-feed/medrxiv-13-when-reconstruction-is-not-enough-doubly-robust-counterfactual-and.md)
- [Medetomidine Appears in Southern California **Fentanyl** Supply: Prevalence, Concentrations, and C](https://medichelpline.com/clinical-feed/medrxiv-1-characterizing-the-emergence-of-medetomidine-in-southern-california-fentanyl.md)
- [Serum IL-6, IL-10 and IL6/IL10 Genotypes in Bangladeshi Patients with Diabetic Neuropathy](https://medichelpline.com/clinical-feed/plos-one-14-association-of-il-6-and-il-10-serum-levels-with-genetic-variants-in-diabetic.md)

## Navigation
- [← Back to Pharmacology Feed](https://medichelpline.com/clinical-feed/pharmacology.md)
- [← All Clinical Specialties](https://medichelpline.com/clinical-feed.md)
## Medical & Regulatory Disclaimer

> [!CAUTION]
> MedicHelpline content is structured for research, educational, and professional discovery purposes. It does not constitute individual medical advice, clinical diagnosis, or treatment recommendations.
> Always verify dosing, contraindications, and regulatory alerts against official product labeling and primary regulatory sources before clinical decision-making.