---
title: "Benchmarking Open-Source Thigh Muscle MRI Segmentation Algorithms"
id: "medrxiv-15-benchmarking-open-source-automated-thigh-muscle-mri-segmentation-algorithms"
canonical_url: "https://medichelpline.com/clinical-feed/medrxiv-15-benchmarking-open-source-automated-thigh-muscle-mri-segmentation-algorithms"
content_type: "clinical_feed_article"
specialty: "Radiology"
source_name: "medRxiv (Clinical Preprints)"
source_url: "https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.16.26363275v1?rss=1"
published_at: "2026-09-22T12:00:00.000Z"
evidence_level: "Verified Feed"
license: "CC-BY-NC-4.0 / Informational Use"
---
# Benchmarking Open-Source Thigh Muscle MRI Segmentation Algorithms
## Provenance & Clinical Metadata
- **Canonical URL:** https://medichelpline.com/clinical-feed/medrxiv-15-benchmarking-open-source-automated-thigh-muscle-mri-segmentation-algorithms
- **Specialty:** [Radiology](https://medichelpline.com/clinical-feed/radiology.md)
- **Primary Source:** medRxiv (Clinical Preprints)
- **Source URL:** [Original Journal Publication](https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.16.26363275v1?rss=1)
- **Published At:** 2026-09-22T12:00:00.000Z
- **Evidence Rating:** Verified Feed
## Executive GIST (TL;DR)
- The study performs an independent head-to-head evaluation of eight open-source automated **thigh muscle MRI segmentation** tools, including six standalone segmentation methods and two auxiliary algorithms intended to refine pre-labeled muscles. - Evaluation used three-dimensional MRI volumes drawn from three base datasets and additional derived datasets to probe generalizability across imaging sources and case mixes. - The authors assessed both quantitative performance metrics and qualitative usability to capture accuracy, ease of deployment, and practical trade-offs relevant to research and clinical workflows. - Results showed substantial variation in performance across methods and datasets; many algorithms had reduced accuracy when applied to **pathological** cases. - **Domain-specific models** trained on large, task-focused datasets generally outperformed foundation models and newer general-purpose architectures on these thigh MRI tasks. - The paper highlights important trade-offs between accuracy, generalizability, and ease of use that affect clinical adoption and deployment decisions. - The authors raise concerns about algorithmic performance on underrepresented populations and pathologies, noting potential risks for downstream biomarker quantification (e.g., volumetrics, radiomics, fat fraction). - All data and code used in the study are publicly available and archived on Zenodo and associated repositories; images were previously anonymized and no new IRB approval was required. - The paper is a preprint and has not been peer reviewed; authors state the work should not be used to guide clinical practice at this stage.
## Clinical Analysis & Structured Key Points
Benchmarking open-source automated thigh muscle MRI segmentation algorithms | medRxiv Skip to main content Benchmarking open-source automated thigh muscle MRI segmentation algorithms View ORCID Profile Candace Makeda Moore , View ORCID Profile Morris Alper doi: https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.09.16.26363275 Candace Makeda Moore 1 Adekam; Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Candace Makeda Moore Morris Alper 2 University of Miami Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Morris Alper For correspondence: malper{at}miami.edu Abstract Info/History Metrics Data/Code Preview PDF Abstract Automatic segmentation of medical images could accelerate clinical and research workflows, yet existing tools are rarely compared independently on shared benchmarks, making it difficult to assess genuine progress. This is particularly consequential for limb muscle segmentation in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which underpins volumetric analysis, radiomics, and fat fraction quantification used as biomarkers in neuromuscular disease -- applications where segmentation errors can directly affect interpretation. Despite the availability of multiple open-source segmentation tools spanning diverse architectures, no independent head-to-head comparison has appeared in the literature. We address this gap by evaluating eight tools, six of which run independently, and the other two of which are meant to be auxiliary algorithms once muscles have been somehow initially labeled. We evaluated these tools on three-dimensional MRI volumes across three base datasets and then later against derived datasets, assessing both quantitative metrics and qualitative usability. Our results reveal substantial performance variation across methods and datasets, with many methods showing reduced accuracy on pathological cases. Domain-specific models trained on large datasets consistently outperformed foundation models and newer general-purpose architectures. Our results reveal practical trade-offs between accuracy, generalizability, and ease of use that are critical for clinical adoption, while raising concerns for deployment on underrepresented populations and pathologies. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Author Declarations I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained. Yes The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below: As the work was based on open previously anonymized images, there was no IRB approval needed. I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals. Yes I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance). Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable. Yes Data Availability Related data are available at 10.5281/zenodo. 21840979 (on Zenodo). Code is open and also archived on Zenodo at https://zenodo.org/records/20787771 https://doi.org/10.15131/shef.data.20440164 https://zenodo.org/records/21840980 https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.31042489 https://osf.io/svwa7/?view_only=c2c980c17b3a40fca35d088a3cdd83e2 Copyright The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license . Back to top Previous Next Posted September 22, 2026. Download PDF Data/Code Email Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv. NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article. Your Email * Your Name * Send To * Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas. You are going to email the following Benchmarking open-source automated thigh muscle MRI segmentation algorithms Message Subject (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv Message Body (Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website. Your Personal Message CAPTCHA This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. Share Benchmarking open-source automated thigh muscle MRI segmentation algorithms Candace Makeda Moore , Morris Alper medRxiv 2026.09.16.26363275; doi: https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.09.16.26363275 Share This Article: Copy Citation Tools Benchmarking open-source automated thigh muscle MRI segmentation algorithms Candace Makeda Moore , Morris Alper medRxiv 2026.09.16.26363275; doi: https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.09.16.26363275 Citation Manager Formats BibTeX Bookends EasyBib EndNote (tagged) EndNote 8 (xml) Medlars Mendeley Papers RefWorks Tagged Ref Manager RIS Zotero Tweet Widget Facebook Like Google Plus One Subject Area Radiology and Imaging Subject Areas All Articles Addiction Medicine (619) Allergy and Immunology (903) Anesthesia (335) Cardiovascular Medicine (4834) Dentistry and Oral Medicine (479) Dermatology (419) Emergency Medicine (651) Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (1633) Epidemiology (15981) Forensic Medicine (33) Gastroenterology (1206) Genetic and Genomic Medicine (7068) Geriatric Medicine (734) Health Economics (1067) Health Informatics (5067) Health Policy (1438) Health Systems and Quality Improvement (1776) Hematology (587) HIV/AIDS (1347) Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (16310) Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (1177) Medical Education (672) Medical Ethics (155) Nephrology (727) Neurology (7305) Nursing (370) Nutrition (1086) Obstetrics and Gynecology (1244) Occupational and Environmental Health (1007) Oncology (3622) Ophthalmology (1057) Orthopedics (398) Otolaryngology (458) Pain Medicine (476) Palliative Medicine (140) Pathology (709) Pediatrics (1805) Pharmacology and Therapeutics (739) Primary Care Research (769) Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (5923) Public and Global Health (9776) Radiology and Imaging (2435) Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (1456) Respiratory Medicine (1250) Rheumatology (643) Sexual and Reproductive Health (773) Sports Medicine (582) Surgery (783) Toxicology (107) Transplantation (306) Urology (293)
## Related Clinical Research

- [Accelerated Whole-Body DWI with Deep Learning Reconstruction in Metastatic Prostate Cancer: Image](https://medichelpline.com/clinical-feed/medrxiv-11-evaluation-of-accelerated-whole-body-diffusion-weighted-imaging-with-deep.md)
- [SISYPHUS study protocol: 3D rotational angiography to assess final implant quality in carotid sten](https://medichelpline.com/clinical-feed/medrxiv-8-systematic-study-of-patients-with-atherosclerotic-neurovascular-stenoses.md)
- [Prevalence and predictors of secondhand smoke exposure in Saudi Arabia: findings from a large nati](https://medichelpline.com/clinical-feed/bmj-open-10-prevalence-predictors-and-burden-of-secondhand-tobacco-smoke-shs-exposure-in.md)
- [First‑trimester glycolipid and inflammatory markers linked to gestational diabetes risk in rural S](https://medichelpline.com/clinical-feed/bmj-open-11-evaluation-of-the-first-trimester-maternal-glycolipid-profile-on-gestational.md)
- [Participation in a low‑intensity health assessment program linked to lower diabetes risk in older](https://medichelpline.com/clinical-feed/plos-medicine-0-association-of-a-multiple-risk-factor-assessment-and-intervention-program-with.md)

## Navigation
- [← Back to Radiology Feed](https://medichelpline.com/clinical-feed/radiology.md)
- [← All Clinical Specialties](https://medichelpline.com/clinical-feed.md)
## Medical & Regulatory Disclaimer

> [!CAUTION]
> MedicHelpline content is structured for research, educational, and professional discovery purposes. It does not constitute individual medical advice, clinical diagnosis, or treatment recommendations.
> Always verify dosing, contraindications, and regulatory alerts against official product labeling and primary regulatory sources before clinical decision-making.