---
title: "DXA Agent: Measurement-burden-aware AI Modeling for Multi-site Bone Mineral Density"
id: "medrxiv-15-artificial-scientific-intelligence-for-measurement-burden-aware-modelling-and"
canonical_url: "https://medichelpline.com/clinical-feed/medrxiv-15-artificial-scientific-intelligence-for-measurement-burden-aware-modelling-and"
content_type: "clinical_feed_article"
specialty: "Radiology"
source_name: "medRxiv (Clinical Preprints)"
source_url: "https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.08.30.26361665v1?rss=1"
published_at: "2026-09-01T12:00:00.000Z"
evidence_level: "Verified Feed"
license: "CC-BY-NC-4.0 / Informational Use"
---
# DXA Agent: Measurement-burden-aware AI Modeling for Multi-site Bone Mineral Density
## Provenance & Clinical Metadata
- **Canonical URL:** https://medichelpline.com/clinical-feed/medrxiv-15-artificial-scientific-intelligence-for-measurement-burden-aware-modelling-and
- **Specialty:** [Radiology](https://medichelpline.com/clinical-feed/radiology.md)
- **Primary Source:** medRxiv (Clinical Preprints)
- **Source URL:** [Original Journal Publication](https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.08.30.26361665v1?rss=1)
- **Published At:** 2026-09-01T12:00:00.000Z
- **Evidence Rating:** Verified Feed
## Executive GIST (TL;DR)
- The authors developed **DXA Agent**, an agentic workflow for modeling and interpreting dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (**DXA**) outcomes that integrates planning, feature-model refinement, tool use, provenance and hypothesis-generating interpretation. - Models were developed and tested independently in two population cohorts: **UK Biobank** (5,318 participants) and **NHANES** (3,777 participants). - The study evaluated prediction across 20 UK Biobank and 3 NHANES bone mineral density sites, comparing cost-efficient and no-limit feature strategies against conventional comparator models. - **Cost-efficient models** achieved lower RMSE and higher R2 than the best conventional comparator, with median relative RMSE reductions of **10.9%** (UK Biobank) and **9.9%** (NHANES) across sites. - Classification performance was task dependent: UK Biobank osteoporosis classification averaged **AUROC 0.839** and **PR-AUC 0.182**; NHANES classification performance was comparable to conventional models. - Including higher-burden (more costly) features did not consistently improve predictive performance across sites. - The analyses are retrospective and cohort-internal; the authors state DXA Agent is an **inspectable, measurement-burden-aware** research workflow that requires independent prospective validation. - Data access notes and ethics: UK Biobank approval by North West Multi-centre Research Ethics Committee (reference 21/NW/0157), UK Biobank data accessed under Application 45925; NHANES data publicly available. Authors declared no competing interests.
## Clinical Analysis & Structured Key Points
Artificial Scientific Intelligence for Measurement-burden-aware Modelling and Interpretation of Multi-site Bone Mineral Density | medRxiv Skip to main content Artificial Scientific Intelligence for Measurement-burden-aware Modelling and Interpretation of Multi-site Bone Mineral Density Shaowen Xiang , Hongyu He , Ziwen Xie , Ching-Yu Cheng , Hengtong Li , Dianbo Liu doi: https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.08.30.26361665 Shaowen Xiang 1 National University of Singapore; Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Hongyu He 1 National University of Singapore; Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Ziwen Xie 2 Shanghai Jiao Tong University; Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Ching-Yu Cheng 1 National University of Singapore; Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Hengtong Li 1 National University of Singapore; Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Dianbo Liu 3 Nation University of Singapore Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site For correspondence: dianbo{at}nus.edu.sg Abstract Info/History Metrics Data/Code Preview PDF Abstract Agentic workflows can coordinate modelling, but balancing predictive performance, measurement burden and reproducibility is unclear. We developed DXA Agent, an agentic workflow for dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) outcomes integrating planning, feature-model refinement, tools, provenance and hypothesis-generating interpretation. Models were independently developed and tested in UK Biobank (5,318 participants) and the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES; 3,777 participants), using cost-efficient and no-limit strategies. Across 20 UK Biobank and three NHANES bone mineral density sites, cost-efficient models achieved lower RMSE and higher R2 than the best conventional comparator, with median relative RMSE reductions of 10.9% and 9.9%, respectively. Classification was task dependent: UK Biobank osteoporosis averaged AUROC 0.839 and PR-AUC 0.182, whereas NHANES performance was comparable with conventional models. Higher-burden features did not consistently improve prediction. These retrospective, cohort-internal findings position DXA Agent as an inspectable, measurement-burden-aware research workflow requiring independent prospective validation. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Author Declarations I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained. Yes The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below: The UK Biobank has ethical approval from the North West Multi-centre Research Ethics Committee as a Research Tissue Bank (reference 21/NW/0157). The UK Biobank data used in this study were accessed under approved Application 45925. All UK Biobank participants provided informed consent. I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals. Yes I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance). Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable. Yes Data Availability The UK Biobank data used in this study are available to eligible researchers through the UK Biobank access procedures and were accessed under Application 45925. These data cannot be redistributed by the authors. https://www.ukbiobank.ac.uk/enable-your-research/apply-for-access https://wwwn.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/Default.aspx Copyright The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license . Back to top Previous Next Posted September 01, 2026. Download PDF Data/Code Email Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv. NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article. Your Email * Your Name * Send To * Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas. You are going to email the following Artificial Scientific Intelligence for Measurement-burden-aware Modelling and Interpretation of Multi-site Bone Mineral Density Message Subject (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv Message Body (Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website. Your Personal Message CAPTCHA This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. Share Artificial Scientific Intelligence for Measurement-burden-aware Modelling and Interpretation of Multi-site Bone Mineral Density Shaowen Xiang , Hongyu He , Ziwen Xie , Ching-Yu Cheng , Hengtong Li , Dianbo Liu medRxiv 2026.08.30.26361665; doi: https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.08.30.26361665 Share This Article: Copy Citation Tools Artificial Scientific Intelligence for Measurement-burden-aware Modelling and Interpretation of Multi-site Bone Mineral Density Shaowen Xiang , Hongyu He , Ziwen Xie , Ching-Yu Cheng , Hengtong Li , Dianbo Liu medRxiv 2026.08.30.26361665; doi: https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.08.30.26361665 Citation Manager Formats BibTeX Bookends EasyBib EndNote (tagged) EndNote 8 (xml) Medlars Mendeley Papers RefWorks Tagged Ref Manager RIS Zotero Tweet Widget Facebook Like Google Plus One Subject Areas All Articles Addiction Medicine (613) Allergy and Immunology (895) Anesthesia (326) Cardiovascular Medicine (4768) Dentistry and Oral Medicine (474) Dermatology (406) Emergency Medicine (643) Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (1613) Epidemiology (15831) Forensic Medicine (32) Gastroenterology (1194) Genetic and Genomic Medicine (6982) Geriatric Medicine (727) Health Economics (1057) Health Informatics (4977) Health Policy (1425) Health Systems and Quality Improvement (1734) Hematology (580) HIV/AIDS (1333) Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (16241) Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (1160) Medical Education (663) Medical Ethics (151) Nephrology (720) Neurology (7190) Nursing (363) Nutrition (1072) Obstetrics and Gynecology (1230) Occupational and Environmental Health (1001) Oncology (3570) Ophthalmology (1036) Orthopedics (393) Otolaryngology (446) Pain Medicine (465) Palliative Medicine (139) Pathology (702) Pediatrics (1772) Pharmacology and Therapeutics (733) Primary Care Research (759) Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (5830) Public and Global Health (9687) Radiology and Imaging (2386) Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (1432) Respiratory Medicine (1239) Rheumatology (633) Sexual and Reproductive Health (765) Sports Medicine (576) Surgery (766) Toxicology (107) Transplantation (302) Urology (286)
## Related Clinical Research

- [Deep Learning for Opportunistic Osteoporosis Screening on Chest Radiographs](https://medichelpline.com/clinical-feed/medrxiv-21-development-of-a-deep-learning-model-for-opportunistic-screening-of.md)
- [Photon‑Counting CT Enables Accurate Hepatic Fat Fraction Quantification Across Body Sizes](https://medichelpline.com/clinical-feed/medrxiv-8-accurate-hepatic-fat-fraction-quantification-across-body-sizes-using-photon.md)
- [Semaglutide Associated With Lower Bone Fracture Risk in Type 2 Diabetes](https://medichelpline.com/clinical-feed/endocrine-news-0-video-semaglutide-linked-to-lower-bone-fracture-risk.md)
- [SGLT2 Inhibitors Linked to Suppression of the Sema3A/NRP1/Plexin-A1 Axis in Postmenopausal T2D Wom](https://medichelpline.com/clinical-feed/pubmed-42649130.md) (DOI: 10.1111/1753-0407.70262)
- [Serum vitamin D (25[OH]D) and Morse Fall Scale risk in hospitalized adults](https://medichelpline.com/clinical-feed/plos-one-18-serum-vitamin-d-levels-and-fall-risk-in-adults-a-cross-sectional-study-using.md)

## Navigation
- [← Back to Radiology Feed](https://medichelpline.com/clinical-feed/radiology.md)
- [← All Clinical Specialties](https://medichelpline.com/clinical-feed.md)
## Medical & Regulatory Disclaimer

> [!CAUTION]
> MedicHelpline content is structured for research, educational, and professional discovery purposes. It does not constitute individual medical advice, clinical diagnosis, or treatment recommendations.
> Always verify dosing, contraindications, and regulatory alerts against official product labeling and primary regulatory sources before clinical decision-making.