---
title: "Early aspirin withdrawal versus dual antiplatelet therapy in high-risk patients after percutaneous coronary intervention: Meta-analysis of randomized trials"
id: "plos-medicine-19-early-aspirin-withdrawal-versus-dual-antiplatelet-therapy-in-high-risk-patients-after-percutaneous-coronary-intervention-meta-analysis-of-randomized-trials"
canonical_url: "https://medichelpline.com/clinical-feed/plos-medicine-19-early-aspirin-withdrawal-versus-dual-antiplatelet-therapy-in-high-risk-patients-after-percutaneous-coronary-intervention-meta-analysis-of-randomized-trials"
content_type: "clinical_feed_article"
specialty: "Research Highlights"
source_name: "PLOS Medicine"
source_url: "https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1004995"
published_at: "2026-03-26T14:00:00.000Z"
evidence_level: "Journal Feed"
license: "CC-BY-NC-4.0 / Informational Use"
---
# Early aspirin withdrawal versus dual antiplatelet therapy in high-risk patients after percutaneous coronary intervention: Meta-analysis of randomized trials
## Provenance & Clinical Metadata
- **Canonical URL:** https://medichelpline.com/clinical-feed/plos-medicine-19-early-aspirin-withdrawal-versus-dual-antiplatelet-therapy-in-high-risk-patients-after-percutaneous-coronary-intervention-meta-analysis-of-randomized-trials
- **Specialty:** [Research Highlights](https://medichelpline.com/clinical-feed/research-highlights.md)
- **Primary Source:** PLOS Medicine
- **Source URL:** [Original Journal Publication](https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1004995)
- **Published At:** 2026-03-26T14:00:00.000Z
- **Evidence Rating:** Journal Feed
## Executive GIST (TL;DR)
by Eliano P. Navarese, Paul Gurbel, Udaya Tantry, Giuseppe Talanas, Klaudyna Grzelakowska, Julia Umińska, Young-Hoon Jeong, Kevin Bliden, Safi U. Khan, Jacek Kubica, Timothy D. Henry, Michael E. Farkouh, Dean J. Kereiakes Background Patients at high ischemic or bleeding risk after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) require protection against thrombotic events with dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) while avoiding bleeding. Although guidelines recommend 12-month DAPT after acute coronary syndrome (ACS), recent trials have tested the safety of early aspirin withdrawal with potent P2Y12-inhibitor monotherapy. Methods and findings We performed a meta-analysis of randomized trials (from inception through August 2025) comparing early aspirin withdrawal (≤3 months) with transition to ticagrelor- or prasugrel-monotherapy versus continued DAPT. Co-primary outcomes were myocardial infarction (MI) and clinically relevant bleeding. Prespecified timing analyses stratified the comparison versus DAPT by aspirin timing: immediate (aspirin noninitiation or in-hospital cessation) and early (post-discharge discontinuation within 3 months). Bayesian models quantified risk-stratified probabilities of benefit and harm; trial sequential analysis (TSA) assessed conclusiveness of evidence. Seven trials ( n = 27,743) were included. P2Y12-inhibitor monotherapy reduced bleeding (HR = 0.55, 95% CI [0.42, 0.71]; p p = 0.31), death, stroke, or stent thrombosis. Immediate aspirin noninitiation/cessation increased MI (HR = 1.41, 95% CI [1.01, 1.97]; p = 0.04), whereas early discontinuation did not (HR = 0.97, 95% CI [0.76, 1.24]; p = 0.82). TSA indicated conclusiveness for bleeding benefit and futility for an MI excess. Analyses restricted to ACS confirmed the overall results. Bayesian analyses corroborated these effects and identified risk-aligned timing: in high bleeding risk, ≤1-month aspirin discontinuation yielded a 100% posterior probability of bleeding benefit (NNT = 12) and 70% probability of MI-safety; in high ischemic risk, 3-month aspirin discontinuation yielded 100% probability of bleeding benefit (NNT = 57) and 86% probability of MI-safety. Limitations include aggregate data only and limited precision for the immediate aspirin withdrawal subgroup. Conclusions Among high-risk post-PCI patients on ticagrelor/prasugrel, discontinuing aspirin within 3 months reduces bleeding without an ischemic trade-off versus DAPT. Immediate aspirin noninitiation or cessation should be avoided; timing should be individualized to bleeding and ischemic risk. PROSPERO: CRD420251167706.
## Clinical Analysis & Structured Key Points
by Eliano P. Navarese, Paul Gurbel, Udaya Tantry, Giuseppe Talanas, Klaudyna Grzelakowska, Julia Umińska, Young-Hoon Jeong, Kevin Bliden, Safi U. Khan, Jacek Kubica, Timothy D. Henry, Michael E. Farkouh, Dean J. Kereiakes Background Patients at high ischemic or bleeding risk after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) require protection against thrombotic events with dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) while avoiding bleeding. Although guidelines recommend 12-month DAPT after acute coronary syndrome (ACS), recent trials have tested the safety of early aspirin withdrawal with potent P2Y12-inhibitor monotherapy. Methods and findings We performed a meta-analysis of randomized trials (from inception through August 2025) comparing early aspirin withdrawal (≤3 months) with transition to ticagrelor- or prasugrel-monotherapy versus continued DAPT. Co-primary outcomes were myocardial infarction (MI) and clinically relevant bleeding. Prespecified timing analyses stratified the comparison versus DAPT by aspirin timing: immediate (aspirin noninitiation or in-hospital cessation) and early (post-discharge discontinuation within 3 months). Bayesian models quantified risk-stratified probabilities of benefit and harm; trial sequential analysis (TSA) assessed conclusiveness of evidence. Seven trials ( n = 27,743) were included. P2Y12-inhibitor monotherapy reduced bleeding (HR = 0.55, 95% CI [0.42, 0.71]; p p = 0.31), death, stroke, or stent thrombosis. Immediate aspirin noninitiation/cessation increased MI (HR = 1.41, 95% CI [1.01, 1.97]; p = 0.04), whereas early discontinuation did not (HR = 0.97, 95% CI [0.76, 1.24]; p = 0.82). TSA indicated conclusiveness for bleeding benefit and futility for an MI excess. Analyses restricted to ACS confirmed the overall results. Bayesian analyses corroborated these effects and identified risk-aligned timing: in high bleeding risk, ≤1-month aspirin discontinuation yielded a 100% posterior probability of bleeding benefit (NNT = 12) and 70% probability of MI-safety; in high ischemic risk, 3-month aspirin discontinuation yielded 100% probability of bleeding benefit (NNT = 57) and 86% probability of MI-safety. Limitations include aggregate data only and limited precision for the immediate aspirin withdrawal subgroup. Conclusions Among high-risk post-PCI patients on ticagrelor/prasugrel, discontinuing aspirin within 3 months reduces bleeding without an ischemic trade-off versus DAPT. Immediate aspirin noninitiation or cessation should be avoided; timing should be individualized to bleeding and ischemic risk. PROSPERO: CRD420251167706.
## Related Clinical Research

- [Sex Differences in Acute Coronary Syndrome Presentation and Management in Brazilian EMS](https://medichelpline.com/clinical-feed/medrxiv-2-sex-based-differences-in-clinical-presentation-management-and-outcomes-of-acute.md)
- [Droplet ADP Secretion Assay (DASA): single-platelet digital detection of primed, active and hyper-](https://medichelpline.com/clinical-feed/biorxiv-13-droplet-microfluidics-reports-digital-and-tuneable-single-platelet-adp.md)
- [Optimal DAPT Duration After PCI with Contemporary DES: Network Meta-analysis of RCTs](https://medichelpline.com/clinical-feed/plos-one-7-dual-antiplatelet-therapy-duration-after-percutaneous-coronary-intervention.md)
- [Stepwise DAPT de-escalation vs standard DAPT after drug-coated balloon angioplasty in multivessel](https://medichelpline.com/clinical-feed/medrxiv-15-impact-of-stepwise-dual-antiplatelet-therapy-de-escalation-in-patients-with.md)
- [Intracoronary prourokinase for slow‑flow/no‑reflow during PCI in ACS: randomized double‑blind tria](https://medichelpline.com/clinical-feed/bmj-open-5-efficacy-and-safety-of-intracoronary-injection-of-recombinant-human.md)

## Navigation
- [← Back to Research Highlights Feed](https://medichelpline.com/clinical-feed/research-highlights.md)
- [← All Clinical Specialties](https://medichelpline.com/clinical-feed.md)
## Medical & Regulatory Disclaimer

> [!CAUTION]
> MedicHelpline content is structured for research, educational, and professional discovery purposes. It does not constitute individual medical advice, clinical diagnosis, or treatment recommendations.
> Always verify dosing, contraindications, and regulatory alerts against official product labeling and primary regulatory sources before clinical decision-making.