Introduction In cluster randomised trials (CRT), groups (rather than individuals) are randomised to intervention and control conditions. Since the publication of the Ottawa Statement on the Ethical Design and Conduct of CRTs, the accurate identification of research participants has continued to challenge researchers and research ethics committees.
Objective In this article, we focus on CRTs involving healthcare providers and provide a practical framework for applying Ottawa Statement criteria for identifying research participants. We illustrate key lessons with example CRTs.
Framework Study procedures should be analysed in relation to the study objective. A study intervention confers research participant status on healthcare providers if the study objective is to evaluate its effect and it is delivered to or targeted at healthcare providers.
A data collection procedure confers research participant status on healthcare providers if it informs a study outcome used to achieve the study objective and it involves interactions between researchers and healthcare providers to collect their data, or the collection of healthcare providers' identifiable private information.
BMJ Open published a clinical update in Research Highlights on 09 Apr 2026.
The item focuses on Practical guide for determining whether healthcare providers are research participants in cluster randomised trials.
Review the original article for the full source wording and details.