Structured exercise training is a primary intervention for cardiovascular disease prevention and rehabilitation. However, large cohort studies have suggested that elevated air pollution may attenuate the cardiovascular benefits of physical activity, raising concerns about exercise prescription in polluted settings where cardiovascular disease burden is often highest. This review sought to clarify whether chronic ambient PM2.5 concentration modifies the cardiovascular response to structured exercise training.
The primary objective was to determine whether ambient PM2.5 concentration alters pre-to-post changes in key cardiovascular and fitness endpoints following structured exercise interventions. Reported outcomes of interest were systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), peak oxygen uptake (VO2Max), and resting heart rate (HR).
The authors conducted a systematic review and multilevel meta-analysis of exercise training interventions in adults that reported pre-post changes in the prespecified cardiovascular outcomes. Trials were identified and pooled to provide a global sample spanning a wide pollution gradient. The clinical protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD420251068843) and the authors declare adherence to ethical guidelines and data availability on request.
Each study location was assigned an annual ambient PM2.5 concentration using CAMS ERA5 reanalysis data. Assigned PM2.5 values in the pooled dataset ranged from 3.5 to 283 µg/m3, capturing more than a 100-fold difference in chronic ambient exposure across study settings.
To account for the hierarchical structure of trial data, three-level random-effects meta-analytic models were used with cluster-robust variance estimation to handle arms nested within studies. The authors conducted PM2.5 meta-regression both unadjusted and adjusted for potential confounders, including world region, exercise mode, trial duration, and health condition. Subgroup analyses were performed by exercise mode (for example, aerobic exercise vs resistance) and by hypertension status.
The pooled dataset comprised 465 studies with 27,629 participants. Across all studies, structured exercise training yielded clinically meaningful improvements in every outcome assessed. Reported pooled effects included reductions in SBP and DBP, an increase in VO2Max of +3.2 ml·kg–1·min–1, and reductions in resting HR; all outcome changes were statistically significant (p < 0.001).
Contrary to the hypothesis that higher pollution might blunt training benefits, observed benefits were consistently larger in higher-pollution settings. The authors interpret this pattern as reflecting greater baseline cardiovascular risk in populations living in areas with elevated PM2.5, which can produce larger absolute improvements following intervention.
Hypertensive participants showed the greatest improvements overall, particularly when undertaking aerobic training. The report provides standardized mean difference estimates for SBP by PM2.5 stratum in hypertensive participants: 0.396 in the Low PM2.5 stratum versus 1.020 in the High PM2.5 stratum. Although participants in aerobic and resistance training categories experienced similar chronic ambient PM2.5 exposure, only aerobic exercise demonstrated a clear gradient across PM2.5 strata. The interaction test for aerobic training across PM2.5 strata yielded p = 0.074.
Meta-regressions were presented in unadjusted and adjusted forms; adjustments included world region, exercise mode, trial duration, and participant health condition. The consistent finding across models was the presence of clinically meaningful benefits of exercise at every pollution level examined.
The study concludes that structured exercise training delivers clinically meaningful cardiovascular benefits across the full range of ambient PM2.5 concentrations included in the analysis. Larger observed benefits in higher-pollution settings are attributed to greater baseline cardiovascular risk in those populations rather than pollution-mediated attenuation of exercise benefit. The analysis indicates that hypertensive patients, especially those performing aerobic exercise, may derive the largest improvements in blood pressure and fitness measures.
Clinicians and public-health practitioners can interpret these findings to mean that exercise interventions remain beneficial across pollution gradients; decisions about exercise prescription should weigh local pollution levels alongside individual cardiovascular risk, but the evidence does not support withholding exercise training solely on the basis of chronic ambient PM2.5 exposure.
Strengths of the work include the large pooled sample (465 trials, 27,629 participants), the global coverage of a wide PM2.5 gradient (3.5–283 µg/m3), and the use of multilevel models with cluster-robust variance estimation to account for nested study arms. Exposure assignment used standardized CAMS ERA5 reanalysis data.
Limitations reported in the source document include the nature of ecological ambient exposure assignment (annual ambient PM2.5 assigned to study locations) rather than individual-level exposure monitoring; details on trial-level heterogeneity and other potential effect modifiers were addressed via adjusted meta-regressions, but residual confounding cannot be excluded. The source did not report individual trial-level microenvironment exposures, short-term pollution peaks during exercise sessions, or indoor vs outdoor exercise patterns for all included trials.
The authors declare no competing interests. Funders listed include NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre and the British Heart Foundation. All data produced are available upon reasonable request, and an interactive map app was provided by the authors.