Falls are increasingly recognized as clinically important adverse events among patients with coronary heart disease (CHD), but their independent prognostic implications for cardiovascular outcomes remain incompletely defined. The authors aimed to determine whether out-of-hospital falls predict long-term cardiovascular events and mortality in patients with CHD, and to evaluate the roles of functional status and frailty in these relationships.
This retrospective cohort study enrolled 2,139 patients with CHD. Patients were followed for a median of 36 months. Falls occurring outside the hospital were ascertained prospectively during the follow-up period using telephone interviews performed every 3 months.
Primary outcomes were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE). Secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality and cardiac mortality. The study used existing medical records together with the interview data to identify outcome events.
Ethics approval for the retrospective analysis was obtained from the Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University (Approval No. K202508-19). Because the study used de-identified retrospective data, the requirement for individual informed consent was waived. The authors report that data are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
The investigators employed multivariable Cox proportional hazards models to estimate associations between falls and outcomes. Models included stepwise adjustment for indicators of functional status to explore mediation of mortality risk. Subgroup analyses were performed with stratification by frailty status, and tests for interaction assessed whether frailty modified the association between falls and cardiovascular outcomes.
During the median 36-month follow-up, 171 patients (8.0%) experienced at least one out-of-hospital fall. In fully adjusted Cox models that accounted for potential confounders and functional status indicators, a history of falls remained independently associated with higher risk of the primary cardiovascular outcomes:
These findings indicate that, independent of measured covariates and functional status indicators included in the models, patients who fell had an approximately 67–73% higher adjusted hazard of experiencing major cardiovascular events compared with those who did not fall.
In univariate (unadjusted) analyses, falls were associated with increased all-cause and cardiac mortality. However, after adjusting for measures of functional status, the association between falls and mortality was no longer statistically significant. The authors interpret this as evidence that the observed relationship between falls and mortality is mediated by functional decline: falls identify patients with worse functional status, and it is the functional impairment that accounts for excess mortality rather than the fall per se.
Frailty status significantly modified the association between falls and cardiovascular outcomes (P for interaction < 0.001). Results stratified by frailty category showed a differential pattern:
These subgroup findings suggest that reporting an out-of-hospital fall identifies a particularly high cardiovascular risk signal in patients who are otherwise robust, whereas in already pre-frail or frail individuals falls do not provide additional independent prognostic information for these cardiovascular endpoints beyond existing frailty-related risk.
In this retrospective cohort of 2,139 CHD patients with median 36 months of follow-up, out-of-hospital falls independently predicted long-term MACE and MACCE after multivariable adjustment. The association between falls and mortality was attenuated after accounting for functional status, consistent with mediation by functional decline. Frailty significantly modified the relationship: falls carried a markedly higher adjusted cardiovascular risk among robust patients but not among pre-frail or frail individuals.
Clinically, these results support considering a history of falls when performing cardiovascular risk assessment in patients with CHD and suggest that fall history may prompt comprehensive evaluation, particularly in patients who otherwise appear robust. The authors propose integrating fall history into risk stratification and applying frailty-stratified management, although the study authors note that these are observational findings.
The research received institutional ethics approval (First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Approval No. K202508-19), and the requirement for individual consent was waived due to the retrospective and de-identified nature of the data. Data are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. This report is a preprint that has not undergone peer review and therefore should not be used as the sole basis for clinical decision-making.
The source article is a retrospective cohort study reported as a preprint. The authors do not provide randomized or interventional data; causal inferences are therefore limited. Specific details beyond those reported in the abstract (for example, full lists of covariates included in adjusted models, exact frailty definitions and measurements, event adjudication procedures, and sensitivity analyses) were not reported in the abstract and would need to be confirmed in the full manuscript or after peer review.
Out-of-hospital falls in patients with coronary heart disease were associated with independently increased long-term risk of major cardiovascular events, with effects on mortality mediated by functional status and large risk amplification among patients classified as robust. These findings highlight falls as a potentially valuable prognostic indicator to incorporate into cardiovascular risk evaluation, pending further confirmation and peer review.