This analysis used participants from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) cohort with a diagnosis of atrial fibrillation (AF) who were assessed between 2011 and 2013. The analytic sample comprised 624 individuals with a mean age of 78.5 ± 5.4 years; 52.6% were male and 13.8% were Black. Median follow-up for repeated assessments of physical function was 6.6 years, with participants assessed up to three times over an eight-year period.
Habitual physical activity was measured using a modified Baecke Physical Activity Questionnaire. The investigators derived components representing sport-related leisure time, non-sport leisure time, and total moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA). These measures were used as primary exposures in cross-sectional and longitudinal models examining associations with physical function outcomes.
Physical function was assessed using three objective measures: the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), grip strength, and 4-meter walk time. The authors also evaluated 4-meter walk speed as a secondary outcome in supplemental analyses. These measures were collected at baseline and at subsequent study visits to permit analysis of trajectories in physical functioning over time.
The study applied confounder-adjusted linear mixed models to estimate associations between baseline physical activity measures and both cross-sectional function and longitudinal change in physical function trajectories. Participants had up to three physical function assessments across an eight-year window, enabling the examination of within-person change. Specific confounders adjusted for in models were not detailed in the abstract; the primary analytic approach focused on whether baseline habitual activity predicted differences in slopes of functional change.
At the baseline visit, higher levels of sport-related leisure time, non-sport leisure time, and greater total MVPA were each significantly associated with better physical function measures. These cross-sectional findings indicate that, among older adults with AF in this cohort, greater habitual physical activity co-occurred with higher performance on the SPPB, stronger grip strength, and faster 4-meter walk times at the time of assessment.
When evaluating trajectories of physical function over follow-up using linear mixed models, baseline measures of physical activity were not significantly associated with subsequent change in physical function. In other words, although baseline activity level correlated with baseline function, it did not predict a different rate of decline or improvement in the objective functional measures during the median 6.6 years of follow-up reported in this analysis.
The authors report that among ARIC participants with atrial fibrillation, greater habitual physical activity and higher MVPA were linked to better baseline physical function but were not associated with trajectories of function over the follow-up interval. From these observational data, the investigators conclude that randomized trials are needed to determine whether interventions that increase habitual activity or specifically increase MVPA can produce sustained improvements in physical functioning in people with AF. The manuscript is a preprint and has not undergone peer review; the authors explicitly note that their findings should not be used to guide clinical practice until further confirmation and trials are available.
The preprint states that ARIC data are available upon approval of a data use application and that restrictions apply. Ethical approval for the work was provided by the ethics committee/IRB of Emory University. The authors declared no competing interests. Funding sources reported include grants from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and the National Institutes of Health. Specific grant numbers and additional administrative details are listed in the preprint.
Note: This summary is based solely on the preprint abstract and accompanying information provided in the source. Details on covariates adjusted for in the models, effect estimates, confidence intervals, and subgroup or sensitivity analyses were not reported in the supplied text and therefore are not presented here. The article remains a preprint and has not been peer reviewed.