The authors present a patented, automated cuff-based technique called plethysmometry intended to estimate ranges of systolic, diastolic and mean arterial pressure during a single recording. Unlike conventional cuff approaches that report single point systolic and diastolic values and rely on Korotkoff sounds or empirical oscillometric algorithms, plethysmometry uses simultaneous measurement of cuff pressure and peripheral pulse waveforms to derive pressure ranges that reflect the subject’s pulse response to graded cuff pressure.
Plethysmometry simultaneously records cuff pressure and finger photoplethysmograms from both the cuffed arm and the contralateral arm. The photoplethysmogram from the contralateral arm serves as an internal physiological reference for pulse amplitude, enabling comparison of pulse amplitude changes in the cuffed arm against an unstressed baseline. Both pressure and pulse traces are captured and stored digitally to provide an objective record of the recording session.
Following an initial cuff pressure ramp, the protocol applies 16 discrete cuff pressure plateaus. During each plateau the system measures pulse amplitude responses in the cuffed arm. The graded plateau sequence is used to probe the relationship between applied external pressure and residual peripheral pulse amplitude, allowing identification of pressure levels associated with changes in pulse transmission that reflect systolic and diastolic transitions.
Automated algorithms developed in MATLAB perform the estimations. The analyses relate both absolute and normalized pulse amplitudes in the cuffed arm to the concurrently recorded cuff pressure. From these relationships the software estimates lower and upper bounds for systolic and diastolic pressures observed during the recording period. In addition, mean arterial pressure is estimated independently using cuff pressure oscillation amplitude. The approach therefore yields pressure ranges rather than single-point measures and uses the subject-specific pulse response to graded cuff pressure as the basis for those estimates.
Plethysmometry reports the following outputs for the recording period: lower and upper systolic pressure range, lower and upper diastolic pressure range, mean arterial pressure range, average values for each reported range, and average pulse pressure. Graphical plots of cuff pressure traces and pulse amplitude responses are provided alongside numeric estimates to allow visual verification and review of measurement quality. The method thus provides both quantitative estimates and corresponding visual data for clinical inspection.
The authors emphasize that conventional cuff-based methods typically deliver single systolic and diastolic values and depend on either Korotkoff auscultation or proprietary oscillometric algorithms. Plethysmometry differs by producing pressure ranges derived from the pulse response to graded cuff pressure while also reporting mean arterial pressure based on oscillation amplitude. A direct comparison of plethysmometric systolic and diastolic pressures with sphygmomanometrically derived pressures, and an analysis of diagnostic agreement, are reported in a companion paper; details of that comparison are not provided in this paper and therefore are not restated here.
The study was conducted with Institutional Review Board approval from the Institutional Review Board of Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamilnadu, India, and the authors state that informed consent and appropriate participant documentation were obtained. Any clinical trial registration requirements were affirmed as satisfied. The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Declared funders include the Department of Biotechnology (grant identifier cited in the source) and the Indian Council of Medical Research (grant identifier cited in the source). The manuscript is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license as posted on the preprint server.
The authors declared no competing interests. Correspondence is directed to the named corresponding author at the institutional email provided in the source. Further methodological details, algorithm code, or datasets may be obtained from the corresponding author upon reasonable request, as noted in the source document.