South Asian adults (originating from Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, the Maldives, Nepal, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka) carry a disproportionate burden of cardiovascular disease, with hypertension as a key modifiable risk factor. Community settings with limited routine screening may fail to detect elevated blood pressure, leaving a substantial portion of cardiovascular risk unrecognized. This study evaluated the prevalence of hypertension and undiagnosed hypertension among South Asian adults who attended community-based health screenings in Northern California and compared findings between the San Francisco Bay Area and the Central Valley.
This was a cross-sectional, survey-based study of adults attending health screenings organized by Jeeva Clinic at religious and community institutions. Participants voluntarily completed a survey capturing demographic characteristics, cardiovascular health history, lifestyle factors, and recent blood pressure measurements obtained either during the screening events or via self-report. The source report indicates that 300 participants were included in the final analysis cohort; however, the number with sufficient blood pressure data varied by outcome (245 for hypertension classification and 244 for determination of undiagnosed status).
Hypertension classification and the definition of undiagnosed hypertension were based on the available blood pressure data and participants' prior diagnosis histories as collected on the survey. The report does not provide additional procedural details such as specific blood pressure thresholds used for classification, the equipment or protocol for measurements, or the time frame for self-reported values.
Statistical comparisons between regions used chi-square testing for categorical outcomes. Multivariable logistic regression models assessed associations between region (Central Valley vs Bay Area), body mass index (BMI), and hypertension status. Exact model covariates beyond region and BMI were not exhaustively listed in the source report.
Of the 300 participants included in the study, 245 had sufficient blood pressure data for hypertension classification; 82.9% of these participants met criteria for hypertension. When assessing previously undiagnosed hypertension, 244 participants had sufficient information and 59.8% were found to have previously undiagnosed hypertension.
Regional comparisons demonstrated pronounced disparities. Hypertension prevalence was significantly higher in the Central Valley compared with the Bay Area (97.9% vs 71.0%; chi-square = 31.2; p < 0.001). The proportion with undiagnosed hypertension was also substantially greater in the Central Valley than in the Bay Area (91.7% vs 37.0%; chi-square = 71.0; p < 0.001).
The reporting included absolute prevalence and chi-square statistics with p-values for regional comparisons. The source does not provide detailed subgroup counts by age, sex, socioeconomic status, or duration of residence, nor does it provide confidence intervals for the unadjusted prevalence estimates.
In adjusted analyses, residence in the Central Valley was strongly associated with higher odds of hypertension (odds ratio [OR] = 14.29; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.89 to 70.63; p = 0.001). Higher BMI was independently associated with increased odds of hypertension (OR = 1.26 per unit increase; 95% CI, 1.10 to 1.43; p < 0.001).
The source indicates these two predictors were significant in the multivariable model. Details about other covariates included in the model, model diagnostics, and measures of model fit were not reported in the source article.
The PRANA Heart Study data from community-based screenings reveal a high burden of hypertension and a substantial proportion of undiagnosed hypertension among South Asian adults engaged through Jeeva Clinic events in Northern California. Marked regional disparities were evident, with the Central Valley showing far higher prevalence and rates of undiagnosed disease compared with the Bay Area. These findings suggest a sizable amount of cardiovascular risk in this population may be going undetected in routine care settings.
The authors highlight that community-based screening efforts can help identify individuals at elevated cardiovascular risk, particularly in underserved regions, and may improve early detection and linkage to care.
The Committee for Protection of Human Subjects at the University of California, Berkeley reviewed the protocol and determined the study qualified as exempt research. The authors declare no competing interests. De-identified data that support the study findings are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request, subject to applicable ethical, privacy, and institutional requirements.
The observed high prevalences of hypertension and undiagnosed hypertension in a community-screened South Asian sample point to potential gaps in access to routine cardiovascular screening and diagnosis, especially in the Central Valley. Community screening initiatives, such as those conducted by Jeeva Clinic at religious and community sites, identified many individuals with elevated or previously unrecognized blood pressure.
These results support the role of targeted, community-oriented screening programs in populations at elevated cardiovascular risk. The source report does not provide follow-up data on referrals, treatment initiation, or blood pressure control after identification; such outcomes were not reported and therefore cannot be summarized here.
Limitations noted in the source are limited. The report does not supply comprehensive methodological details on measurement protocols, sampling frame, or all covariates included in adjusted models, and these omissions should be considered when interpreting the findings.