Rotating night shift work disrupts the circadian system and has been hypothesized to contribute to higher risk of cardiometabolic disease and death. The clinical impact of rotating night schedules may differ by an individual's preferred sleep–wake timing, or chronotype, particularly when work hours are misaligned with endogenous circadian preference. This study examined associations of rotating night shift work duration with incident cardiovascular disease (CVD) and all-cause mortality, and evaluated whether associations varied by chronotype, in the Nurses' Health Study II.
The analysis included 69,458 female participants from the Nurses' Health Study II who were free of CVD at the 2009 baseline when chronotype was reported. Mean age at baseline was 54.4 years. Duration of rotating night shift work was assessed biennially starting in 1989 and updated over follow-up. Chronotype categories included classifications such as definite morning and definite evening types as reported by participants in 2009.
Participants were followed from 2009 through June 2021 for two primary outcomes: incident CVD—defined as myocardial infarction or stroke—and all-cause mortality. During follow-up there were 1,005 incident CVD events over 800,630 person-years and 1,777 deaths over 806,043 person-years.
The investigators used time-varying Cox proportional hazards models to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for associations of rotating night shift work duration and chronotype with each outcome. Primary models adjusted for key demographic variables, established CVD risk factors, and workplace factors. Analyses modeled rotating night shift work both categorically (including <5 years and ≥5 years) and continuously (including restricted cubic spline analyses) to assess dose–response patterns. Interaction tests evaluated whether associations differed by chronotype.
Each 5-year increment in duration of rotating night shift work was associated with a modestly higher risk of incident cardiovascular disease (HR 1.07; 95% CI 1.01–1.14). For all-cause mortality, each 5-year increment in rotating night shift work was associated with a 13% higher risk (HR 1.13; 95% CI 1.08–1.17).
Independent of shift work duration, greater eveningness was associated with higher risk of both outcomes: for incident CVD the HR was 1.17 (95% CI 1.06–1.28) and for all-cause mortality the HR was 1.18 (95% CI 1.10–1.26).
When results were stratified by chronotype, the increased incident CVD risk per 5-year increase in rotating night shift work was observed among definite morning types (HR 1.11; 95% CI 0.99–1.23) but not among definite evening types (HR 0.99; 95% CI 0.86–1.15). The formal test for interaction between rotating night shift work and chronotype for incident CVD was not statistically significant (p-interaction = 0.1732).
For all-cause mortality, associations with shorter-term rotating night shift work (<5 years) appeared more evident among definite morning types (HR 1.39; 95% CI 1.12–1.73) than among definite evening types (HR 1.37; 95% CI 0.98–1.91). This apparent difference by chronotype was not observed for longer durations (≥5 years), and the overall interaction test for mortality by chronotype was not statistically significant (p-interaction = 0.57).
The authors report that modeling rotating night shift work duration continuously using restricted cubic spline methods produced similar patterns to the categorical analyses, supporting the observed associations across analytic approaches. Details on other sensitivity analyses or subgroup adjustments beyond those stated in primary models were not detailed in the source summary.
In this large prospective cohort of female nurses, longer duration of rotating night shift work was associated with modestly higher risks of incident cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality, and greater evening preference was independently associated with higher risk for both outcomes. The pattern of chronotype-specific results suggested nurses with a morning chronotype may be more susceptible to adverse effects of rotating night schedules, but formal interaction tests did not reach statistical significance. Restricted cubic spline analyses supported similar trends when shift work duration was modeled continuously.
The manuscript discloses competing interests for some authors related to roles, consultancies, and editorial stipends; these relationships were reported as unrelated to the present work and managed according to institutional policies. The Institutional Review Boards of Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health approved the research. Data are not publicly available due to participant privacy; access may be requested through the Nurses' Health Study data-access procedures.
Note: The source did not provide additional granular details on some sensitivity analyses, specific covariate lists beyond broad categories, or absolute risk estimates; these were not reported in the provided summary.