Circadian rhythms are commonly disturbed in patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU), which may adversely influence recovery and clinical outcomes. In typical ICU practice, continuous enteral nutrition is often provided around the clock, removing daily feeding–fasting cycles that act as important timing cues for the circadian system. This trial investigated whether delivering enteral nutrition in a cyclic daytime pattern (08:00–20:00), compared with continuous 24-hour administration, affects circadian rhythmicity in critically ill adult patients.
This was a single-center randomized controlled trial conducted in a mixed medical–surgical tertiary ICU in the Netherlands. Adult patients (≥18 years) who required enteral nutrition were randomized at the start of nutritional support to one of two feeding strategies. The trial compared physiologic circadian measures between the groups during the intervention period.
A total of 62 ICU patients were enrolled in the study. The per-protocol analysis included 51 patients; the report provides results based on that analysis. The study was performed at a single tertiary ICU; further demographic or baseline clinical characteristics were not detailed in the source summary.
Patients were randomized to receive either continuous enteral feeding across 24 hours or cyclic daytime enteral feeding limited to the hours 08:00–20:00, initiated from the start of nutritional support. The cyclic schedule preserved a nightly fasting interval intended to reintroduce a daily feeding–fasting timing cue.
The trial assessed 24-hour rhythmicity of several physiologic signals. Key measured variables included:
Reported statistical comparisons included median amplitudes with interquartile ranges and p values for group differences where provided.
Of the 62 patients enrolled, 51 contributed to the per-protocol analysis. The primary reported findings were:
Core body temperature: The amplitude of the 24-hour rhythm did not differ significantly between cyclic daytime and continuous feeding groups. Median amplitude values were 0.17 (interquartile range [IQR] 0.09–0.24) for the cyclic daytime group versus 0.20 (IQR 0.13–0.30) for the continuous group (p = 0.182).
Heart rate: Patients receiving cyclic daytime feeding exhibited an enhanced 24-hour rhythm in heart rate, shown by significantly higher amplitudes and more synchronized peak times compared with patients on continuous feeding. The report emphasizes both increased amplitude and greater synchronization of heart rate peaks with cyclic feeding.
Other outcomes: No significant differences between feeding strategies were observed for 24-hour rhythmicity of other vital signs or for melatonin rhythms.
The authors interpret these findings as evidence that reinstating a daytime-limited feeding schedule can strengthen specific peripheral circadian signals—most clearly evident for heart rate—in critically ill patients.
The trial suggests that switching from continuous to cyclic daytime enteral feeding may enhance certain circadian rhythms, notably the 24-hour rhythm of heart rate, in ICU patients. Core body temperature amplitude and melatonin rhythmicity were not significantly altered by the feeding schedule in this cohort. The authors recommend further studies to determine whether enhancing circadian rhythmicity via timed feeding translates into improved clinical outcomes.
The randomized controlled trial is registered under Clinical Trial NCT05795881. Ethical approval was obtained from the local medical ethics committee of Leiden, Den Haag, and Delft in the Netherlands (protocol P22.080; approval date 9 December 2022). Patient consent and adherence to reporting guidelines were affirmed by the authors in the declaration.
Funding was declared from ZonMw (The Dutch Organisation for knowledge and innovation in health), the Dutch Research Council, the Dutch Society for Intensive Care, and Leiden University Medical Center. One author reported a consultancy relationship with Eli Lilly & Co that the authors state is unrelated to this work; all other authors declared no conflicts of interest. Deidentified individual participant data and the statistical code are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request, subject to approval and a data sharing agreement.