This PubMed record documents an article titled "Quantifying Nurse and Physician Clinical Performance for Mechanically Ventilated Patients" published in Health Services Research (Health Serv Res) in August 2026 (volume 61, issue 4, article e70153). The DOI is 10.1111/1475-6773.70153. The PubMed identifier (PMID) is 42522719 and a full‑text manuscript is associated with PMCID PMC13417481.
The bibliographic entry supplied in the source establishes the publication venue and persistent identifiers required to retrieve the complete article but does not include the study abstract or substantive study content in the provided extract.
The article lists a multidisciplinary team of authors with lead author Christopher F. Chesley. Contributing authors represent multiple academic centers, including the University of Pennsylvania (PAIR Center, Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics), University of Miami, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Johns Hopkins School of Nursing, Yale School of Nursing and Medicine, University of Michigan School of Nursing, and related VA and parity research centers.
Affiliations span pulmonary, critical care, palliative and advanced illness research, nursing schools, and health economics units, indicating a cross‑disciplinary collaboration between clinicians and health services researchers.
Key identifiers provided in the PubMed record are:
The record includes a link to Wiley for full‑text options and the presence of a PMCID indicates that an open‑access copy is available through PubMed Central. These identifiers should be used to locate the complete article for full methodological and results details.
By title, the manuscript focuses on quantifying nurse and physician clinical performance in the care of mechanically ventilated patients. The title implies measurement or assessment of clinician behaviors, processes of care, or performance metrics specific to mechanical ventilation management in critical care settings. The combination of nursing and physician perspectives suggests the study may address interdisciplinary performance or compare roles, but the provided source does not report study specifics.
What is reported in the provided PubMed content:
What is not reported in the provided extract and therefore unknown from this source alone:
Because these substantive elements are not present in the supplied PubMed page content, they must not be assumed or inferred here.
To assess the study's clinical relevance, quality, and applicability, clinicians and researchers should:
Retrieve the full article using the DOI, PMID, or PMCID links provided in the PubMed record.
Review the abstract and full methods to determine study design, setting, sample characteristics, and the operational definition of the performance measures used to evaluate mechanically ventilated patients.
Examine results for the magnitude and precision of measured differences or associations, and review any reported measures of interrater reliability, validity of instruments, or adjustment for confounders.
Consult conflict of interest and funding statements and consider external validity to local ICU practice and team structure.
If planning to apply findings to practice, verify whether the study reports actionable performance metrics, validated measurement tools, or implementation strategies for clinician assessment and quality improvement.
Note: The present source excerpt supplies only bibliographic and author information. For methodological detail, numerical results, and clinical recommendations, the full published article must be consulted via the DOI link or PubMed Central (PMCID) entry.