The PubMed entry records a review entitled Tropospheric Ozone Assessment Report II: Changing health impacts of global ozone exposure. The article appears in Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci with a publication date of 26 October 2026. The DOI is 10.1098/rsta.2025.0268 and the PubMed ID is 42929037. The record categorizes the item as a Review in the PubMed display.
Multiple named authors are listed in the citation. The lead and contributing authors include Gaige H Kerr, Kofi Amegah, Lulu Chen, James L Crooks, Drew Shindell and many others. The PubMed entry shows full author attribution but the provided source content does not include an abstract or the manuscript text that would describe the contribution of individual authors or author-order rationale.
The entry lists broad institutional representation across environmental health, atmospheric science, epidemiology and respiratory medicine. Reported affiliations include (but are not limited to) the Department of Environmental and Occupational Health at George Washington University; the Nicholas School of the Environment at Duke University; the Atmospheric Chemistry Department at the Max-Planck-Institut für Chemie; the Laboratory for Climate and Ocean-Atmosphere Studies at Peking University; the National Center for Atmospheric Research; and respiratory medicine and public health departments at The University of British Columbia and the University of North Carolina.
The scope of institutions reflects a cross-disciplinary effort. The PubMed metadata indicates collaboration among researchers in exposure science, climate and atmospheric modeling, biostatistics, and clinical respiratory fields. The provided source lists affiliations in full, which readers can use to identify corresponding institutional expertise and potential data sources for the review.
This record identifies the work as a Review article. The bibliographic block includes volume and issue notation (384(2332):20250268) consistent with the journal’s numbering, plus the DOI and PMID already noted. These identifiers are sufficient to locate the full text through journal or library channels.
The title and article type imply that the manuscript synthesizes evidence on tropospheric ozone and its health impacts at a global scale, but the PubMed excerpt supplied here contains only the bibliographic entry; it does not provide the review’s text, tables, or figures.
The PubMed entry in the provided content supplies complete author lists, affiliations, DOI, PMID, journal citation and classification as a Review. That is the extent of concrete, citable information available in the supplied source.
The source did not include an abstract, a summary of findings, exposure metrics, described health endpoints, or details about methods. The excerpt did not report whether the review included quantitative burden estimates, meta-analysis, systematic-review methods, model-based exposure reconstructions, or policy recommendations. The PubMed record in this capture therefore does not permit extraction of clinical results or specific epidemiologic data.
Clinical and critical-care readers seeking actionable information — for instance, exposure–response relationships, specific morbidity or mortality estimates linked to ozone, susceptible patient populations, or temporal trends in burden — will need to read the full manuscript. The PubMed metadata confirms the presence of a multidisciplinary review but does not substitute for the article’s substantive content.
The bibliographic identifiers (DOI and PMID) and the complete author-affiliation list are provided here to facilitate rapid retrieval of the full report from the journal website or institutional access routes. Use those identifiers to obtain the article text for detailed appraisal.
The content supplied from PubMed is limited to administrative and bibliographic information. The source did not report the review’s methodology, inclusion criteria, exposure definitions, health endpoints, quantitative results, or conclusions. The absence of an abstract in the provided capture prevents summary-level evaluation of the evidence and precludes any clinical or policy interpretation based solely on this record.
Readers should treat this PubMed entry as an index entry: reliable for citation and for identifying contributors and institutions, but insufficient for clinical decision-making or for extracting epidemiologic estimates. To answer clinical questions about the effects of tropospheric ozone on patient outcomes, obtain and appraise the full report and any supplementary materials directly from the journal or publisher.