Subepithelial connective tissue grafting remains a reference treatment for predictable root coverage. While short- and medium-term outcomes after tunnel-based procedures are well documented, evidence on stability beyond 10 years is limited. This retrospective cohort study evaluated the long-term clinical performance of a minimally invasive tunnel technique combined with subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG) when applied under routine clinical conditions.
The study retrospectively included 74 patients (57 women and 17 men) who together contributed 710 gingival recession sites treated between 2009 and 2025. The source reports a mean follow-up value in unclear wording (“6.0 for 4.0 years”); the precise mean follow-up and dispersion are not clearly stated in the provided text. The maximum observation period was 16 years. No further demographic or comorbidity details beyond sex distribution were reported in the manuscript text provided.
All recession sites were treated using a tunnel approach combined with SCTG. Enamel matrix derivative (EMD) was applied in selected cases; the source does not specify criteria for EMD use or the number of sites that received it. The procedures were performed in routine clinical practice settings across the stated time span.
The primary outcome was reduction in recession depth. Secondary outcomes included complete root coverage (CRC), mean root coverage, and long-term marginal stability. The authors defined a clinically relevant relapse as a 1 mm increase in recession after initial healing. Long-term marginal stability assessment focused on whether sites maintained coverage or deteriorated beyond baseline recession levels over the follow-up period.
Mean recession depth reduction reported in the cohort was 2.72 mm.
Complete root coverage (CRC) was achieved at 83.4% of treated sites.
At the final available follow-up, no treated site demonstrated a clinically relevant relapse (≥1 mm increase in recession) after initial healing, and no site deteriorated beyond its baseline recession level.
Treatment effects were noted across both anterior and posterior regions; the manuscript did not provide detailed breakdowns by tooth region or by other subgroups in the text provided.
The cohort demonstrated durable marginal soft-tissue stability up to the maximum reported observation of 16 years. According to the study definitions, neither clinically relevant relapse nor deterioration beyond baseline recession was observed at the final follow-up for any treated site. These outcomes suggest sustained surgical benefit after tunnel technique plus SCTG in this real-world series.
Within the limitations inherent to a retrospective cohort design, the authors conclude that tunnel surgery combined with SCTG is associated with high predictability of root coverage and long-term marginal stability extending to 16 years. They interpret these real-world data as supportive of phenotype-enhancing, minimally invasive soft-tissue augmentation as a durable therapeutic strategy for management of localized and multiple gingival recessions.
The authors declared no competing interests. Ethical review and oversight were reported: the Ethics Committee of the Medical Association of Westphalia-Lippe and the Westphalian Wilhelms University provided correspondence dated June 23, 2016 with file number 2015-530-f-S. The study used data originally located in the Charly PH Patient Data Management System; authors state that all necessary patient consents and approvals were obtained and that all relevant data are contained within the manuscript.
Key limitations reported or evident from the source text include the retrospective design and incomplete clarity in the manuscript on the mean follow-up figure (wording in the source is unclear regarding the exact mean and variation). The source did not report detailed subgroup analyses, precise numbers of sites treated with adjunctive EMD, or other potential confounders. These gaps should be considered when interpreting long-term durability and generalizability of the findings.
This preprint was posted on medRxiv and is identified with doi: https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.08.17.26360439. The posting date in the source is August 18, 2026. The manuscript states that all data produced are contained within the present work and that reuse is restricted by the preprint copyright holder.