Early Childhood Caries (ECC) is described in the protocol as one of the most common chronic childhood conditions, affecting over 600 million children globally. Untreated ECC can cause severe pain, abscesses, difficulty chewing with downstream effects such as malnutrition, impaired speech, disrupted sleep, psychosocial impacts, and poor school performance. Although largely preventable, the authors note persistent high prevalence driven by delayed preventive care and limited parental awareness.
The study tests whether a mobile health (mHealth) application delivering Sustained Anticipatory Guidance (SAG) can provide continuous, accessible, age-appropriate education to parents and thereby reduce ECC. Prior evidence supports anticipatory guidance as an effective approach, but long-term reinforcement through a mobile app has not been evaluated. The protocol frames the Zero Cavity app as a potentially scalable, low-cost model to extend consistent preventive counselling beyond clinic visits, especially relevant for low- and middle-income country settings.
This is a two-arm, parallel, hospital-based randomized controlled trial to be conducted at Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education & Research, Chennai, India. The study will enrol participants from the departments of Pediatric Medicine and the Centre for Early Childhood Caries Research (CECCRe).
The protocol specifies enrolment of 540 mother–infant dyads, with infants aged 6–12 months in the predentate stage at baseline.
Eligible dyads include mothers and infants in the specified age window who are in the predentate stage. The protocol indicates that enrolment will occur from clinical departments serving the study population. Further inclusion and exclusion criteria used for screening were not detailed beyond age and predentate status in the source text.
Enrolled dyads will be randomized to one of two groups: the intervention arm receiving the Zero Cavity mHealth app or the control arm receiving standard care. The document describes a parallel-group randomised allocation but does not provide further operational details of the randomization method or concealment procedures in the text provided.
The experimental intervention is the Zero Cavity mobile application delivering Sustained Anticipatory Guidance (SAG). The app is described as delivering sustained, age-appropriate guidance on oral development, hygiene practices, feeding and diet, and fluoride use. The intervention is explicitly theory-driven to improve cultural relevance, usability, and to facilitate behaviour change. The protocol includes validation and user-perception evaluation components alongside effectiveness testing, although the source text does not enumerate specific validation measures or user-perception instruments.
For children identified as high risk or with enamel defects/incipient lesions, the protocol indicates that clinical photographs will be taken to support individualized preventive guidance delivered through the app or by study staff.
Participants randomized to the control arm will receive standard care. The source does not specify the exact content or frequency of standard care counselling or educational materials provided, only that this represents usual clinic-based counselling against which the app will be compared.
The primary outcome is the effectiveness of the app in preventing Early Childhood Caries. Secondary outcomes include ECC incidence and prevalence measured over the follow-up period.
Clinical examinations will be performed quarterly by calibrated dentists using the ICDAS II criteria. Dentists will record both cavitated and non-cavitated lesions. The protocol also specifies that clinical photographs will be collected for certain high-risk children to guide individualized prevention.
Baseline data and semi-annual information will be collected on oral hygiene practices, fluoride exposure, and feeding/diet. Clinical exams occur quarterly. The protocol plans for process evaluation to assess engagement and implementation, with the expectation that these process data will illuminate how the intervention is used and delivered. Specific process metrics and tools were not detailed in the provided source text.
The trial will enrol 540 dyads; the source characterizes the trial as large and adequately powered, though the protocol text provided does not include the statistical assumptions, power calculation, or the exact analysis methods. The authors state that analysis will follow an intention-to-treat approach. Details such as handling of missing data, planned subgroup analyses, or statistical models were not reported in the excerpt.
The study received Institutional Ethics Committee approval from Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education & Research (IEC No: NI/23/APR/86/06) and is registered in the Clinical Trials Registry - India under CTRI/2026/04/107305. The authors declare no competing interests. The protocol states that data supporting the study findings will be available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
The protocol frames ECC as a persistent public health challenge, particularly where preventive access and consistent counselling are limited. The authors propose that the Zero Cavity app, by delivering continuous, age-tailored anticipatory guidance, could bridge gaps in preventive care and parental knowledge. They anticipate that a behavioural theory-driven, culturally relevant mHealth approach will improve usability and promote behavior change, and that process evaluation will help interpret engagement and implementation barriers or facilitators.
If effective, the protocol suggests the app could provide a scalable, low-cost strategy to expand continuous preventive oral health services for diverse urban and peri-urban populations, with particular relevance for low- and middle-income country settings. Specific timelines for follow-up, detailed statistical plans, and operational details of the app’s content and delivery were not provided in the source text.