In sub‑Saharan Africa women increasingly face the dual pressures of undernutrition and a growing burden of overweight and obesity, often within weak health systems and rapidly changing food environments. In the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) this dynamic may be amplified by rapid urbanization, socioeconomic disparities, insecurity and shifting lifestyles. National evidence identifying which women are most affected by excess weight and the social or geographic drivers is limited. This analysis of the 2023 Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) data aimed to identify determinants of overweight and obesity among women of reproductive age and to describe social and geographic inequalities.
The study used nationally representative DHS 2023 data for the DRC. The analytic sample comprised 10,740 non‑pregnant women aged 15–49 years with valid anthropometric measurements. Overweight and obesity were combined and defined as BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2. A broad set of potential correlates were examined, including province, urban/rural residence, household socioeconomic status, household size, education, marital status, occupation, dietary diversity score, indicators of unhealthy diet, media exposure, internet use and health service utilization.
Weighted analyses accounted for the DHS sampling design. Variables associated with overweight/obesity at p < 0.20 in bivariate screening were entered into multivariable models. Multicollinearity was assessed using adjusted generalized variance inflation factors (GVIFs). Four hierarchical weighted logistic regression models were constructed; interpretation was guided by the fully adjusted model presented by the authors.
Overall, 19.5% of women aged 15–49 in the DRC were classified as overweight or obese (BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2). The distribution of excess weight was not uniform across provinces. Compared with reference provinces, the analysis identified significantly lower odds in Kongo Central and Tshuapa, while women in Bas‑Uele, Nord‑Kivu, Sud‑Kivu and Maniema experienced substantially higher odds. These findings indicate notable spatial inequities in the burden of excess weight within the country.
A pronounced socioeconomic gradient was observed. Compared with women in the poorest households, adjusted odds of overweight/obesity rose progressively: women in middle‑income households had higher odds (aOR 1.65; 95% CI 1.13–2.41), those in rich households had still higher odds (aOR 2.41; 95% CI 1.62–3.60), and the highest odds were among women in the richest households (aOR 4.19; 95% CI 2.45–7.16). Larger household size appeared protective: households of 4–5 members (aOR 0.68), 6–7 members (aOR 0.72) and ≥8 members (aOR 0.69) showed lower adjusted odds compared with smaller households.
Age emerged as the strongest individual predictor; risk of overweight/obesity increased sharply after age 30. Being married or in a union was independently associated with higher odds of excess weight. Rural residence was associated with lower odds compared with urban residence (adjusted OR for rural vs urban = 0.6; 95% CI 0.48–0.79; p < 0.001), underscoring the urban concentration of the epidemic.
In the fully adjusted models, measured indicators of dietary diversity and the reported unhealthy food indicators were not statistically significant predictors of overweight/obesity. Notably, frequent internet use independently predicted higher odds of excess weight in adjusted analyses. The authors included media exposure and internet access among the covariates to capture aspects of digital and informational environments that may relate to lifestyle and risk.
The DHS 2023 analysis shows that overweight and obesity are rising among Congolese women but are distributed unevenly across social and geographic groups. Urban residence, household socioeconomic status, increasing age (especially after 30 years), marital status and frequent internet use strongly shape who is most affected. The authors highlight deep social and provincial inequities and recommend equity‑oriented, province‑specific actions alongside strengthened primary prevention to address the growing epidemic.
The study used anonymized secondary DHS data; the authors state that details on IRB oversight were provided and that ethical guidelines were followed. Data produced in the study are available on reasonable request to the principal author and via the DHS Program website. The source did not report additional details beyond the DHS dataset and the statistical modeling approach summarized above.