The gut microbiome influences human health, and urbanization has been proposed as a driver of population‑level shifts in microbial communities. This preprint reports a targeted comparison of gut microbiome profiles between rural and urban women in Vietnam. The study included 157 female participants total: 76 urban residents and 81 rural residents. The authors aimed to evaluate rural–urban differences in microbial diversity, individual taxa, and metabolic pathways using shotgun metagenomic data.
Stool samples from the enrolled women were profiled with shotgun metagenomic sequencing. The investigators assessed microbial alpha diversity and beta diversity, tested for differential abundance of individual microbial taxa, and examined differences in metabolic pathway representation. Analyses were performed using models adjusted first for age, and then sequentially adjusted for socioeconomic characteristics, lifestyle factors, dietary variables, and comorbidity.
In age‑adjusted models, rural residents had significantly higher alpha diversity (within‑sample diversity) and different beta diversity (between‑sample composition) compared with urban residents (p < 0.05). These findings indicate larger within‑sample richness/evenness and greater overall community dissimilarity associated with rural residence in the age‑adjusted analysis.
Using age‑adjusted models with false discovery rate control, 35 microbial taxa differed between rural and urban participants (FDR < 0.1). Key taxa with higher relative abundance in rural women included classes, orders, and families within groups labeled FGB2982 and FGB38642 and the strain SGB15332 of Faecalibacterium prausnitzii. In contrast, urban participants had higher relative abundances of multiple species, notably Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron, Coprobacter fastidiosus, Bilophila wadsworthia, Enterobacter cloacae, Enterobacter hormaechei, Klebsiella aerogenes, Dielma fastidiosa, and Holdemania massiliensis in the age‑adjusted analysis.
When models were further adjusted for socioeconomic characteristics, lifestyle, dietary factors, and comorbidity, many of the rural–urban associations attenuated (FDR > 0.1). The authors report that after accounting for these potential confounders or mediators, the previously observed differences for a number of taxa were no longer statistically significant, suggesting that urbanization‑related factors such as diet and socioeconomic status may partly explain the observed microbiome differences.
In the fully adjusted models, 17 microbial taxa remained significantly different between rural and urban groups (FDR < 0.1). Examples highlighted by the authors include Ruminococcus sp AF13_28 and Prevotella pectinovora. Additionally, three metabolic pathways showed significant rural–urban differences after full adjustment (FDR < 0.1). The specific pathway names were reported in the source manuscript; readers should consult the full preprint for precise pathway identifiers and directionality.
The study was conducted according to the Declaration of Helsinki and received ethical approvals from the Institutional Review Boards of the Vietnam National Cancer Institute (IRB No.160530; approval dated May 30, 2016) and Vanderbilt University Medical Center (IRB No.161039; approval dated May 31, 2018). The authors state that participant consent procedures were completed and documented. Study data are available on reasonable request from the corresponding author. Funding for the work included support from the National Cancer Institute (P20CA210300) and OISE‑19‑66185‑1.
This report is a preprint and has not been peer reviewed; the authors explicitly note it should not be used to guide clinical practice. The analyses show that initial rural–urban differences in gut microbiome diversity and composition are detectable in age‑adjusted models, but many associations are attenuated after accounting for socioeconomic, lifestyle, dietary, and comorbidity characteristics. The authors interpret these findings to mean that urbanization‑related factors may contribute substantially to gut microbiome variation between urban and rural Vietnamese women. Data-sharing is offered on request, and further peer review and replication would be necessary before drawing stronger causal conclusions or clinical implications.