This facility-based cross-sectional study measured the magnitude of antenatal depression among pregnant women attending public health centers in Shire town, Tigray region, Ethiopia, in the post-war period. The research team conducted the survey during November–December 2025, allocating the sample proportionally across health centers according to antenatal care caseloads recorded for that period. The study population included pregnant women presenting for routine antenatal care at public health centers in Shire.
The sample comprised 463 pregnant women; all recruited participants were included in the analysis (response rate 100%). After selecting the first participant by lottery, investigators used systematic sampling, enrolling every third eligible attendee. The study applied bivariable analysis to screen candidate variables; those with p ≤ 0.25 were entered into a multivariable logistic regression model to identify factors independently associated with antenatal depression.
The report presents adjusted odds ratios (AOR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for associations between sociodemographic, obstetric, psychosocial, and conflict-related variables and antenatal depression. Specific measurement instruments for depression screening were not reported in the abstract.
The prevalence of antenatal depression among the 463 pregnant women was 34.3% (95% CI: 30–38.7%). This figure represents the proportion of participants who met the study’s threshold for depression during the antenatal visit period in the post-conflict setting.
Multivariable logistic regression identified several factors associated with increased odds of antenatal depression in this post-war population.
Age: Women aged 25–34 years had higher odds of antenatal depression compared with the reference group (AOR = 3.43; 95% CI: 1.7–7.2).
Pregnancy intention: Those reporting unplanned pregnancies had increased odds (AOR = 2.2; 95% CI: 1.25–3.87).
Conflict-related exposures: Participants who experienced conflict-related traumatic events had higher odds of depression (AOR = 2.6; 95% CI: 1.41–4.81).
Displacement status: Being an internally displaced person was associated with greater odds of antenatal depression (AOR = 2.02; 95% CI: 1.05–3.92).
Interpersonal violence and relationships: Reported intimate partner violence (IPV) increased odds (AOR = 2.22; 95% CI: 1.31–3.8), and a poor partner relationship was also associated with higher odds (AOR = 2.17; 95% CI: 1.2–3.96).
Perceived safety: Low perceived neighborhood safety was linked to elevated odds of antenatal depression (AOR = 2.7; 95% CI: 1.5–5.08).
The study’s analyses provide effect estimates and CIs for these associations. Details about other covariates included in the multivariable model and the reference categories for each variable were not reported in the abstract.
Several indicators of relative economic advantage were associated with lower odds of antenatal depression:
Middle income (AOR = 0.54; 95% CI: 0.31–0.93).
Higher income (AOR = 0.15; 95% CI: 0.065–0.33).
Very good pre-war economic status (AOR = 0.4; 95% CI: 0.16–0.94).
These findings suggest that greater household resources and better pre-conflict economic conditions were protective against antenatal depression in this sample.
Authors conclude that antenatal depression was common in this post-conflict Shire population and that internally displaced women had higher odds of depression. Based on reported associations, the authors recommend integrating mental health and psychosocial support into routine antenatal care. They also highlight the need for targeted interventions addressing conflict-related trauma, intimate partner violence, socioeconomic vulnerability, and community safety to reduce maternal mental health burden in post-war settings.
The study emphasizes the relevance of psychosocial screening and referral pathways within antenatal services in areas affected by conflict, and the value of socioeconomic and community-level interventions to mitigate risk.
The authors reported that ethical approval was obtained from Aksum University Institutional Review Board. They confirmed participant consent processes and stated that the corresponding author will provide data on request. The authors declared no competing interests. Specific details about the depression screening tool, full variable list, and complete model covariates were not reported in the abstract and would require consultation of the full manuscript or dataset.