Depression, Anxiety and Stress in Elderly Residents of Old Age Homes in Dhaka and Gazipur

Study design and setting

This was a cross-sectional study conducted to evaluate levels of depression, anxiety and stress among elderly people residing in selected old age homes (OAHs) in Dhaka and Gazipur, Bangladesh. Three institutions were chosen by purposive sampling: Probin Nibash (Agargaon), Priyojon Nibash (Darus Salam Road) and Old Rehabilitation Center (Gazipur). Data collection used face-to-face interviews and a semi-structured questionnaire.

Participants and sampling

A total of 175 participants who met inclusion criteria were enrolled from the three OAHs. Sampling was purposive and participants were interviewed in person. The source provides the mean age (75.31 ± 7.72 years) and the most prevalent age group (66–70 years). Female participants made up 52% of the sample and males 48%.

Data collection tools and analysis

Mental health outcomes were measured with the DASS-21 instrument to assess depression, anxiety and stress levels. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 26. The source reports prevalence estimates and associations between sociodemographic, anthropometric, clinical characteristics and satisfaction with institutional facilities and mental health outcomes. Exact statistical tests other than reported p-values were not specified in the abstract.

Sociodemographic and clinical profile

Educational status, marital status, family composition, prior occupation and health conditions were reported for the study population. Key characteristics included:

• Education: 38.3% of participants were graduates.
• Marital status and family: 90.3% were widowed and 80% reported having 1–2 children.
• Previous occupation: 50.3% had non-government jobs previously and 40% were housewives.
• Communication and caregiving: 68% reported never communicating with their family; 80.6% had no one to take care of them at home.
• Chronic disease burden: 58.3% reported chronic illnesses. Specific conditions reported included diabetes (47.06% of those with chronic disease or of whole sample as reported), hypertension (16.67%) and heart disease (7.84%). The abstract does not detail durations or treatment status for these conditions.

Institutional satisfaction and social contact

Participants were asked about satisfaction with various services provided by the institutions. Reported satisfaction rates were high across several domains:

• Food: 61.14%
• Recreation: 83.43%
• Medical care: 80.0%
• Caregiver services: 96.57%
• Safety: 98.86%
• Physical exercise: 93.43%
• Social activities within the institution: 99.43%
• Funeral system: 83.43%

Despite these high satisfaction levels for institutional services, the majority of participants reported limited external social contact, with 68% never communicating with family.

Prevalence of depression, anxiety and stress

Using the DASS-21 scoring, the study found high prevalence of mental health symptoms among residents:

• Depression: 80.57% of participants had mild to extremely severe levels.
• Anxiety: 68% of participants had anxiety at varying severities.
• Stress: 70.29% of participants had stress at varying severities.

The source reports these prevalence estimates but does not provide detailed breakdowns by severity category in the abstract.

Associations between clinical variables and mental health outcomes

The study examined associations between mental health outcomes and participant characteristics. Significant findings reported in the abstract include:

• Depression was significantly associated with female gender, less communication with family, and 1–5 years of staying in OAHs (p < 0.001).
• Anxiety was significantly associated with female gender and less communication with family (p < 0.05).
• Stress was significantly associated with less communication with family and 1–5 years of staying in OAHs (p < 0.001).

The abstract reports these associations and p-values but does not specify effect sizes, confidence intervals or the exact analytic methods used to derive them.

Ethics, data availability and reporting

The authors report that ethical approval was obtained from the National Research Ethics Committee of the Bangladesh Medical Research Council (BMRC/Revenue/Research Grant/2026/646(01-168)). Permission from the selected institutions was obtained and written informed consent was taken from participants. Privacy, confidentiality and the right to withdraw were maintained. The dataset (SPSS file) was uploaded as supporting information.

Notes on interpretation

This report is a preprint and has not undergone peer review; the authors and the medRxiv posting note that the findings should not be used to guide clinical practice without further validation. The abstract provides key prevalence estimates and significant associations but does not include some methodological details (for example, exact sampling frame, exclusion criteria, full statistical methods, severity breakdowns and effect size measures). Those details may be available in the full manuscript or supplementary materials but are not reported in the abstract provided here.