Emergency post-abortion care (EPAC) provides the life-saving clinical response to acute abortion-related complications such as haemorrhage, sepsis, retained products of conception, and severe pain. In Uganda, abortion is legally restricted and socially stigmatised; these legal and social factors intersect with clinical urgency to shape how women experience and evaluate care in referral hospitals. This study sought to describe how women who received EPAC at Kawempe National Referral Hospital (KNRH) interpreted and assessed their care, and to identify factors at multiple levels that shaped those experiences.
A qualitative phenomenological design was used to capture lived experiences. Researchers analysed sixteen in-depth interview transcripts from women who received EPAC at KNRH in March–April 2026. Data were analysed using inductive thematic analysis. The Socio-Ecological Model (SEM) served as an interpretive framework to situate individual experiences within interpersonal and health system contexts. Ethical approval was obtained from the Makerere University School of Medicine Research and Ethics Committee (Mak-SOMREC-2025-913) and Kawempe National Referral Hospital. All participants provided written informed consent and transcripts were anonymised.
Analysis identified six interrelated themes that describe how women experienced EPAC at KNRH. These themes reflect bodily vulnerability, interpersonal interactions, and system-level constraints.
For many participants, the primary criterion for satisfactory care was survival and the relief of immediate physical danger. Life-saving clinical intervention and the cessation of acute symptoms were central to how women judged the quality and success of care. Narratives emphasised that, despite other shortcomings, having stable vital signs and removal of immediate threat were viewed as essential outcomes.
Accounts commonly described intense procedural pain and significant emotional distress while undergoing treatment. Procedural discomfort, anxiety about clinical procedures, and fears related to both health and social consequences were recurrent elements in women's descriptions. These experiences of pain and fear coexisted with acknowledgement of clinical effectiveness, creating a complex appraisal of care.
Reassurance from health workers, companions, or family members acted as an important buffer against feelings of vulnerability. Supportive communication, emotional presence, and practical help during admission reduced distress for some women. These interpersonal supports helped participants interpret their experiences more positively even when other aspects of care were suboptimal.
Participants highlighted issues of communication and privacy as core to dignity in care. Several women reported suboptimal communication from providers and compromised privacy during assessment and procedures. These conditions contributed to feelings of moral and emotional vulnerability, especially in the context of stigma surrounding abortion. Respectful, clear communication and protection of privacy were identified implicitly as components of dignified EPAC.
System-level constraints influenced the timeliness and quality of EPAC. Women described delays in triage and treatment, financial burdens associated with care, and broader health system limitations that impeded smooth care pathways. These structural barriers affected experiences from arrival through inpatient management and discharge planning.
Post-discharge narratives indicated ongoing concerns about recovery and a sense of uncertainty. Many participants reported incomplete recovery, limited structured follow-up, and a lack of clear post-discharge support, leaving them unsure about convalescence and future reproductive health needs.
Women’s evaluations of EPAC at KNRH were shaped first by the imperative of survival, but accounts also revealed significant unmet needs in pain management, communication, privacy, triage efficiency, and post-discharge care. The authors conclude that strengthening EPAC requires patient-centred approaches that integrate clinical effectiveness with respectful communication, targeted pain management strategies, improved triage processes, and structured post-discharge support. Addressing structural barriers and enhancing interpersonal aspects of care are presented as central to improving the overall EPAC experience in this referral hospital setting.
The study received ethical approval from the Makerere University School of Medicine Research and Ethics Committee (SOMREC; approval reference Mak-SOMREC-2025-913) and Kawempe National Referral Hospital. All participants provided written informed consent; transcripts were anonymised and participants could withdraw without consequence. Representative transcript excerpts supporting reported themes are included in the paper; full interview transcripts are not publicly available due to confidentiality and consent restrictions. Anonymised thematic data can be requested from the corresponding author subject to SOMREC approval and compliance with applicable data protection requirements.