High-quality antenatal care (ANC) facilitates detection, management, and monitoring of pregnancy-related complications. International guidance recommends at least eight ANC contacts during pregnancy. Interventions that strengthen routine services — particularly nutrition and infection management — may improve ANC uptake and the quality of care delivered and thereby support better pregnancy outcomes.
This study assessed whether packages of enhanced nutrition and enhanced infection management, delivered in rural health centers in Amhara, Ethiopia, affected ANC contacts and a composite antenatal quality of care (ANC QoC) score.
The investigation was a pragmatic clinical effectiveness study employing a 2x2 factorial design. Twelve rural health centers in the Amhara region participated. The study period for enrollment spanned August 2020 to December 2021, with participant follow-up continuing until June 2022.
Cluster allocation of health centers determined provision of the Enhanced Nutrition Package (ENP) versus routine nutrition care; within those allocations, individual-level randomization assigned pregnant women to the Enhanced Infection Management Package (EIMP) or to routine infection care. This approach produced four study groups for comparison: ENP+EIMP, ENP alone, EIMP alone, and neither package (routine care).
Eligible participants were pregnant women who presented to participating health centers at less than 24 weeks' gestation. A total of 2,392 women were randomized across the four trial arms. The randomized sample comprised 604 women assigned to ENP+EIMP, 600 to ENP alone, 593 to EIMP alone, and 595 to neither package.
All participants were followed prospectively through the pre-specified follow-up period described in the study timeline.
Health centers were cluster-allocated to deliver either the Enhanced Nutrition Package or routine nutrition services. Within those clusters, individual participants were randomized to receive the Enhanced Infection Management Package or routine infection management. The manuscript describes the factorial allocation but the abstract does not detail the exact components or delivery mechanisms of ENP or EIMP; those intervention specifics are reported in the full protocol referenced in the article.
The primary outcomes reported in the abstract were the number of ANC contacts and a composite antenatal quality of care (ANC QoC) score. Analytic approaches included cluster-level analyses at the health center level to estimate marginal effects of ENP, multivariate regression analyses to estimate marginal effects of EIMP, and generalized estimating equations for combined effects versus routine care. Models were adjusted for imbalanced individual and household covariates.
The abstract reports adjusted mean differences (aMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for comparisons between intervention arms and their controls.
Across the randomized cohort (n = 2,392):
Number of ANC contacts: ENP versus non-ENP yielded an adjusted mean difference of 1.67 additional contacts (aMD = 1.67; 95% CI: 1.18 to 2.16).
EIMP versus non-EIMP showed a smaller but statistically significant increase in contacts (aMD = 0.38; 95% CI: 0.14 to 0.62).
The combined ENP+EIMP versus routine care demonstrated the largest increase in ANC contacts (aMD = 1.92; 95% CI: 1.48 to 2.36).
ANC quality of care (ANC QoC) score: ENP alone improved the composite QoC score versus non-ENP (aMD = 2.13; 95% CI: 0.54 to 3.72).
EIMP alone also improved the ANC QoC score versus non-EIMP (aMD = 0.89; 95% CI: 0.44 to 1.34).
The combined ENP+EIMP versus routine care produced the greatest improvement in ANC QoC (aMD = 2.77; 95% CI: 1.28 to 4.27).
All reported comparisons were adjusted for imbalanced covariates; the abstract provides effect estimates and confidence intervals but does not present additional subgroup or sensitivity analyses in the abstract text.
In this pragmatic trial conducted in rural Amhara, packages that strengthened nutritional support and infection management during pregnancy were associated with increased numbers of ANC contacts and higher composite ANC quality scores. The largest effects were seen when both packages were combined (ENP+EIMP). The authors interpret these findings to mean that bolstering nutrition and infection management services during pregnancy could motivate pregnant women to attend additional ANC contacts, creating opportunities to deliver targeted interventions.
The abstract frames these results as supportive of integrated service enhancements to improve antenatal service utilization and care quality. As this report is a preprint, the authors note that the work has not yet been peer reviewed and should not by itself change clinical practice.
The trial was registered as ISRCTN15116516. Ethical approvals were obtained from the Addis Continental Institute of Public Health (approval 001-A1-2019) and the Mass General Brigham Institutional Review Board (2018P002479). Participants provided written informed consent before participation.
The authors state that the data described in the manuscript, the codebook, and analytic code will be made available upon request subject to application and approval. The abstract and article indicate declarations of competing interests, noting one author reported research support and all other authors reported no conflicts.
Note: The abstract summarizes the primary outcomes and effect estimates. Detailed descriptions of the ENP and EIMP components, full statistical tables, subgroup analyses, and other protocol details are referenced in the full manuscript and clinical protocol but are not provided in the abstract itself.