Three San Francisco health system emergency departments independently developed and implemented Geriatric Emergency Department (GED) models of care specifically to support older adults at risk for or living with dementia. The sites represented a mix of care settings: a tertiary care ED, a critical access ED, and a large integrated health system–community ED. Each program was designed pragmatically to fit local context while aiming to improve identification, immediate management, and post-discharge support for patients with cognitive impairment.
The participating systems recognized several shared needs: a high proportion of older adults presenting to the ED, frequent risk for cognitive impairment and dementia among these patients, and the importance of identifying cognitive problems during the ED encounter. They also prioritized developing practical approaches to connect patients and their care partners with diagnostic specialty services and community resources after discharge.
The three hospitals each described how they pragmatically adopted GED models to enhance care for ED patients at risk for or living with dementia. Implementation varied by site but shared common elements: selection and use of screening and assessment tools for cognition, capture of assessment data within care workflows, and design of pathways to support transitions of care. The report focuses on program descriptions and implementation strategies rather than controlled comparative outcomes.
All GED programs incorporated tools to screen and assess older adult patients for cognitive impairment. Screening and assessment data were systematically captured to guide ED management and to facilitate linking patients with follow-up services. The specific screening instruments used at each site are not detailed in the abstract; the source reports that screening and assessment were core components across sites.
Each program emphasized use of captured assessment data to connect patients and care partners with relevant resources and diagnostic specialty services post-discharge. Mechanisms included referrals and processes intended to ensure coordinated transitions of care. Programs were built to strengthen communication and to provide targeted support for older adults when they left the ED, recognizing that timely linkage to outpatient services and community supports is essential for ongoing dementia care.
Although united by common goals, site pathways differed according to local context. Variation occurred in target patient age thresholds, staff roles assigned to GED activities, and allocation of resources to support program functions. Multidisciplinary contributions varied by location and included support from geriatrics, emergency medicine, palliative medicine, neurology, psychiatry, pharmacy, and pastoral care. Referral processes and the degree of specialty involvement were tailored to each ED’s patient population and organizational structure.
The authors report the proportion of ED encounters made by patients with dementia histories and the number of such encounters reached by GED programs. The abstract indicates these measurements were collected at each site to characterize program reach. The source presents program reach and descriptive implementation outcomes rather than inferential effectiveness results; detailed quantitative values and outcome measures are reported in the full article and associated data, which are available from the authors upon reasonable request.
A central conclusion is that GED interventions for patients at risk for or living with dementia can be developed and sustained when program pathways are aligned with health system leadership priorities. Sustained implementation required persistent demonstration of program value, regular communication, and promotion within the organization. The authors frame GED program development as an iterative process relying on continuous quality improvement to address geriatric syndromes, including dementia care.
Ethical approvals and oversight for the work were obtained: Kaiser Permanente (IRB #00014882) and University of California San Francisco (IRB #13-12500 and #21-35849) provided approvals as noted in the source. The authors state that all necessary participant consent and institutional approvals were secured. Data produced in the study are available from the authors on reasonable request for each of the participating systems. Clinical protocols referenced by the authors are available at https://edrive.ucsf.edu/geriatrics.
The three EDs demonstrate that pragmatic, context-sensitive GED models can be implemented across diverse emergency settings to enhance care for older adults with or at risk for dementia. Key elements include routine screening and assessment, data capture to support care planning, coordinated transitions to outpatient and community resources, and multidisciplinary collaboration. Sustainability depends on aligning GED activities with leadership goals and continuously demonstrating value. The authors advocate for dissemination of GED models and ongoing quality improvement to improve emergency care for older adults with dementia.