This preprint reports evaluation of an inexpensive, portable hand-held spectrophotometer for quantitative measurement and classification of human skin colour. Under standardised conditions, the authors collected skin reflectance and colorimetric data from 40 participants of diverse ancestral backgrounds at three anatomical sites: forehead (FH), right posterior forearm (FA), and right upper inner arm (RUA). Additional data included demographic and ancestral information, Fitzpatrick Skin Phototype classification, standardised iPhone 13 photographs, and both visual and device-based skin colour matches.
Colorimetric values were converted to Individual Typology Angle (ITA) values and used to generate site-specific classifications across multiple categorical systems. The authors present the approach as a versatile, affordable, and reproducible method intended to reduce bias and to be independent of race, ethnicity, and ancestry when measuring and classifying skin colour.
The evaluation included 40 participants described as representing diverse ancestral backgrounds. Measurements were obtained at three anatomical sites per participant: the forehead (FH), the right posterior forearm (FA), and the right upper inner arm (RUA). The work combined instrument-derived reflectance and colorimetric data with demographic and self-reported ancestral information.
The study also captured Fitzpatrick Skin Phototype classifications and standardised digital images using an iPhone 13 to provide visual reference material. Both visual matching (Pantone skin-tone matches) and device-based colorimetric matches were recorded to compare modalities.
Under standardised measurement conditions, a portable hand-held spectrophotometer was used to record skin reflectance and derive colorimetric parameters. The authors paired device measurements with visual assessments: participants’ skin tones were visually matched to Pantone colours at each site. Recorded counts of Pantone matches were 25 for FH, 33 for FA, and 28 for RUA.
Digital photographs were taken with an iPhone 13 under standardised conditions to provide an image-based reference for visual assessment and potential future comparisons.
Colorimetric data from the spectrophotometer were converted into ITA (Individual Typology Angle) values. These ITA values were then used to generate site-specific categorical assignments across several established classification systems:
Using ITA as a numerical bridge, the authors mapped continuous colorimetric measures to multiple classification frameworks to allow cross-referencing among systems commonly used in dermatology and related fields.
The report highlights that the portable spectrophotometer produced quantifiable colorimetric measurements that could be converted to ITA values and assigned to different categorical scales on a per-site basis (FH, FA, RUA). Visual Pantone matching produced specified counts per site (25 FH, 33 FA, 28 RUA), which were recorded as part of the comparative dataset.
The authors conclude that the method is versatile and supports affordable, reproducible skin colour measurement and classification that does not rely on race, ethnicity, or ancestry. The approach was demonstrated across multiple classification schemes, enabling site-specific assignments derived from objective spectrophotometric data.
According to the authors, this spectrophotometer-based approach has several practical attributes:
The study also integrated standardised photography and visual Pantone matches alongside device measurements, allowing comparison between visual and instrument-derived assessments.
The manuscript discloses potential competing interests: George Yu is the founder of Variable Inc and currently serves as Chief Technical Officer. Ophelia E. Dadzie is a Director of London Ethnic Skin Limited. The authors are inventors on a patent application related to the technology, methodology, or intellectual property described. The disclosure states that London Ethnic Skin Limited and Variable Inc have supported development of the technology and may hold commercial interests related to the intellectual property described in the manuscript.
Ethics approval for the research was granted by HRA and Health and Care Research Wales (HCRW). All participants provided informed consent for participation and for future use of biospecimens in research. Participants also gave informed consent for publication of data generated from their samples. The authors confirm that necessary participant consent forms and institutional approvals were obtained and archived.
The authors state that the data underlying the article are available in the article itself and in the online supplementary material associated with the preprint.
Note on peer review: This report is a medRxiv preprint posted July 31, 2026, and has not been certified by peer review. The authors note it should not be used to guide clinical practice.