This cohort study examined changes in recorded primary care contact for maternal postnatal checks during the COVID-19 pandemic using region-level electronic health records. The analysis focused on the extent and timing of recorded postnatal interactions in general practice and whether delivery of these checks recovered over the study period.
The authors analysed anonymised, clinically coded birth event records from the Greater Manchester Care Record (GMCR). The study population comprised females aged 16–49 years with delivery episodes recorded in the GMCR between January 2018 and August 2023. The GMCR provided the regional primary care data used to generate monthly rates of postnatal-related coding in general practice.
Unique delivery episodes were defined for individual women and used as the denominator for monthly rates. The study calculated rates of women with a postnatal-related code recorded in primary care within multiple follow-up windows: 4 weeks, 6 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks, and up to 1 year. The primary outcomes reported in the abstract focus on the 6- and 8-week windows, which align with recommended postnatal check timing in England.
An interrupted time series design was applied to model the onset of the pandemic and estimate changes in rates of recorded postnatal checks; the model produced an incidence rate ratio (IRR) quantifying the immediate change associated with the pandemic onset. To assess the influence of maternal characteristics on the odds of non-attendance at the examination, a logistic regression adjusting for various maternal factors was fitted. The abstract reports the IRR and describes adjusted regression modelling; specific adjusted odds ratios from the logistic model were not provided in the abstract.
Across the analysed period there were 114,874 unique delivery episodes in the 12-week follow-up cohort relating to 85,076 women. For narrower windows, there were 72,595 delivery episodes (55,784 women) in the 8-week cohort and 28,846 episodes (24,018 women) in the 6-week cohort.
Interrupted time series modelling estimated an IRR of 0.49 (95% CI 0.40–0.58) at the onset of the pandemic, indicating an immediate and substantial reduction in recorded postnatal interactions in general practice.
For the 8-week window, recorded rates fell from approximately 325 per 1,000 delivery episodes in 2019 to around 225 per 1,000 by April 2020, a reduction of 30.8%. Rates remained reduced for a prolonged period and only returned to pre-pandemic levels by October 2022. The authors note that recorded rates of postnatal checks increased with longer follow-up windows, which reflects that some checks were recorded outside the recommended 6–8 week period.
The study identified persistent differences by maternal ethnicity: rates of recorded postnatal checks remained lower overall for women recorded as Black or Asian compared with White women. The abstract highlights these disparities in provision and uptake of postnatal services but does not report the full set of adjusted effect estimates in the abstract text.
The findings indicate that the COVID-19 pandemic substantially reduced postnatal follow-up recorded in primary care across Greater Manchester, and that many recorded checks occurred outside the recommended 6–8 week window. The reduction persisted for a prolonged period before recovery by October 2022. The authors suggest that better integration of data across care sites and enhanced risk management approaches could improve equity of access and support more timely delivery of postnatal care, particularly for groups at higher risk of postnatal complications and long-term health problems.
The abstract states the analysis used de-identified GMCR data and that the study did not require formal ethical approval because the analysis was carried out under the COPI notice for COVID-19 research and was reviewed and approved through GMCR secondary uses governance. The abstract does not provide full details of the logistic regression estimates or all covariates; those details are not reported in the abstract and would require consultation of the full manuscript or underlying data.
Region-level primary care records from Greater Manchester show a near halving in recorded postnatal interactions at the pandemic onset (IRR 0.49, 95% CI 0.40–0.58), with slower recovery and ongoing ethnic disparities in recorded postnatal checks. The authors recommend improved data integration and risk-focused management to support timely and equitable postnatal care delivery.