This heading intentionally mirrors the Table of Contents entry and does not reflect renal data in the source. The source article investigated professional identity among nursing interns rather than kidney outcomes. The study used convenience sampling to recruit 407 nursing interns at a tertiary hospital in Quanzhou between May and July 2025. Questionnaires administered included the Social Support Scale, Perceived Stress Scale, Psychological Resilience Scale, the Professional Identity Questionnaire for Nursing Students, the Career Adaptability Scale, and a Questionnaire for Nurse Intention to Retention Employed. The authors reported institutional review board approval (Quanzhou First Hospital, No. Quan Yi Lun 2025K163) and declared no competing interests.
The investigators reported a mean professional identity score of 61.74 ± 11.08 across the cohort. A majority—73.5%—fell into a moderate professional identity category according to the study's scoring scheme. Group comparisons found statistically significant differences in professional identity scores by parents' attitude toward nursing, reported reasons for choosing the profession, personal attitude toward the major, and employment intention (p<0.05). The manuscript did not provide further demographic breakdowns in the abstract; the full text contains additional participant descriptors.
Correlation patterns were described with Pearson coefficients. Professional identity correlated positively with social support (r=0.474), psychological resilience (r=0.389), and career adaptability (r=0.609), all with p<0.01. Perceived stress correlated negatively with professional identity (r=-0.378, p<0.01). These bivariate relationships framed subsequent multivariable analyses.
Multiple linear regression assessed independent predictors of professional identity. Career adaptability (β=0.309, p<0.001) and social support (β=0.383, p<0.001) emerged as significant positive predictors in the final model. Conversely, reasons for choosing the profession (β=-3.603, p=0.001) and employment intention (β=-7.116, p<0.001) were identified as negative predictors. The model explained 49.2% of variance in professional identity scores, according to the authors' report.
Mediation testing employed the PROCESS macro to explore whether career adaptability mediated the relationship between social support and professional identity. The mediation effect was quantified at 0.288 with a 95% confidence interval of 0.221–0.363. The authors calculated that this indirect path accounted for 40.2% of the total effect of social support on professional identity, consistent with a partial mediation model where both direct and indirect effects remained.
The study team interpreted these results as evidence that stronger social support is associated with higher professional identity among nursing interns, and that one mechanism for this association is enhanced career adaptability. The manuscript states that social support can indirectly increase professional identity by strengthening career adaptability, while also exerting a direct association.
Limitations reported in the source are limited in the abstract. The authors used convenience sampling at a single tertiary hospital; that sampling approach and single-site recruitment were documented. The abstract did not explicitly state the overall study design label (for example, cross-sectional), nor did it list response rate, detailed demographic distributions, or scale-specific psychometric statistics beyond the correlations and regression coefficients reported. Readers should consult the full manuscript for supplementary tables and the methods section for instrument properties and scoring thresholds.
Practical questions remain unanswered in the preprint. The source did not report intervention testing to modify social support or career adaptability, so causal inference is limited to observed associations. The paper has not undergone peer review at the time of posting on medRxiv; the authors and readers therefore must treat the findings as preliminary. The IRB approval is documented, but there is no mention of trial registration since this study did not report on a registered interventional protocol.
Those seeking to apply these findings to educational policy or workforce planning should weigh the study's sampling method and single-center scope. Additional replication in varied institutions, explicit reporting of study design features in the main text, and prospective or interventional work to test whether bolstering social support or career adaptability increases professional identity would address the open questions left by this preprint.