Healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) are described in the study as a leading adverse event in healthcare delivery. Despite Kenya's existing National Infection Prevention and Control policy and strategic plan, the investigators observed a persistent and substantial policy-to-practice gap at the facility level. The study aimed to explore context-specific structural, behavioral, and administrative barriers to implementing IPC at a level V teaching and referral hospital in Kenya to inform localized tailoring of national guidance.
The research was a cross-sectional qualitative study conducted at a level V teaching and referral hospital in Kenya. Data collection involved key informant interviews that were audio-recorded and supplemented with field notes. Transcription and translation of audio data were completed prior to analysis. Thematic content analysis was performed using QSR NVivo V.12.
Seven key informant interviews were completed: five participants were IPC committee members or providers and two were departmental managers. The analytic approach comprised thematic content analysis of the transcribed and translated interview recordings and field notes. The source reports that seven major themes emerged from this analysis; specific illustrative quotes or detailed participant characteristics are not reported in the abstract.
Seven overarching themes were reported as obstacles to effective IPC implementation in the hospital setting. These themes reflect structural, administrative, resource, and behavioral domains that collectively generate the observed policy-to-practice gap.
Participants identified deficiencies in ongoing IPC education and knowledge retention among frontline staff. Financial and human resource constraints were reported to directly undermine continuous medical education initiatives. As a result, the study highlights interruptions in IPC training as a barrier to sustained practice change.
Workforce shortages and strained staffing ratios were described as forcing clinical teams to triage competing priorities, often deprioritizing IPC activities. The study links inadequate human resources to reduced capacity for routine IPC measures and diminished ability to institutionalize guidelines in everyday practice.
Resource scarcity emerged as a major structural barrier. The authors report that limited financial resources and gaps in WASH (water, sanitation, and hygiene) infrastructure functionality create a disabling environment for IPC. These constraints hinder practical implementation of national guidelines at the facility level.
Interactions between the hospital and surrounding community were identified as a factor affecting IPC. The study points to the community–hospital interface as an influence on infection prevention efforts, although specific community-related mechanisms are not detailed in the abstract.
Investigators found a governance-related lag between national IPC frameworks and facility-level operations. The study emphasizes the need for dynamic local adaptation of national policies, noting that the existing gap limits effective implementation at the frontline.
Gaps in IPC surveillance and monitoring were identified as a barrier to identifying, tracking, and responding to HAIs. The study suggests deficiencies in monitoring systems impede timely feedback and corrective action, although the abstract does not provide granular details on surveillance methods or metrics used.
Behavioral factors among staff—specifically attitudes, ignorance, and accountability—were documented as drivers undermining IPC practice. The authors describe these behavioral elements as interacting with structural constraints to sustain poor adherence to IPC measures.
The study concludes that a substantial policy-to-practice gap persists at the facility level due to intertwined structural, resource, and behavioral constraints. To address these barriers, the authors recommend that hospital leadership transition from reactive crisis management to proactive, sustained strategies, including continuous medical education and investment in durable WASH infrastructure. They also argue that national IPC frameworks should be dynamically adapted and tailored to the operational realities and resource limitations faced by frontline healthcare workers to enable effective implementation.
The authors report that ethical approvals and relevant research licenses were obtained from several institutions: the United States International University–Africa Institutional Review Board, the National Commission for Science, Technology and Innovation of the Government of Kenya, the Kiambu Health Department, and the Thika Level 5 Teaching and Referral Hospital. The manuscript states that all necessary participant consent was obtained and that all relevant data underlying the findings are contained within the manuscript and its supporting information file. Competing-interest disclosures note that three authors (Janet Ng'ethe, Nicole Wamaitha, and Cynthia Nduta) serve as advisors to the Ministry of Health, Kiambu County Government on IPC policy development; remaining authors declared no competing interests.
This qualitative study, based on interviews with IPC committee members and departmental managers at a Kenyan level V teaching and referral hospital, identifies seven major themes that contribute to a persistent policy-to-practice gap in infection prevention and control. The barriers span training and knowledge retention, workforce shortages, resource and infrastructure deficits, governance and surveillance weaknesses, the community–hospital interface, and staff behavior. The authors recommend proactive leadership, continuous education, sustainable WASH investments, and the local adaptation of national IPC frameworks to the realities of frontline care. As noted in the source, this report is a medRxiv preprint and has not been peer reviewed; details beyond those presented in the abstract (for example, specific quotations, participant demographics, or detailed examples of implemented interventions) are not provided in the abstract text.