Uganda has experienced sustained community transmission of clade Ib Mpox since 2024. Effective community-level prevention requires understanding how risk and protective factors are distributed across individual, household, community and structural levels. The investigators applied a socio-ecological framework to map determinants of Mpox transmission risk and protective practice across multiple districts with differing burden levels.
This was a multi-district, community-based cross-sectional survey conducted between February and March 2025. The study enrolled 3,960 community members aged 15–65 years using multistage sampling. Trained interviewers administered a structured tool on tablets. Individual-, household-, community- and structural-level characteristics were summarized descriptively.
For association analyses, the authors used a modified Poisson regression model with district-clustered robust standard errors to estimate crude and adjusted prevalence ratios (cPR, aPR) for the outcome of adequate Mpox prevention and control practice. The multivariable model included 3,916 participants with complete covariate data. Analyses were performed in R version 4.5.0.
Participants had a mean age of 32.0 years (SD 10.7); 51.9% (2,056/3,960) were female. The largest education category was secondary education (54.2%). Most participants (80.2%) resided in districts classified as high-burden districts for Mpox.
Self-reported comorbidities were common: sexually transmitted infections were reported by 28.3% of participants, HIV by 13.9%, tuberculosis by 8.2% and malnutrition by 6.2%. The report frames this as a substantial comorbidity burden that overlaps geographically with higher Mpox burden.
Perception of personal risk was reported by 60.9% of participants. Message exposure about Mpox was near-universal, reported by 93.2% of respondents. Despite widespread exposure to messages, only 18.7% of participants had comprehensive knowledge of Mpox according to the study’s measurement. Reported adequate prevention practice was 53.8% overall.
This pattern indicates a gap between message reach and accurate, actionable knowledge.
In adjusted models accounting for district clustering and measured covariates, the strongest protective determinants of adequate Mpox prevention practice were comprehensive knowledge (adjusted prevalence ratio [aPR] 1.32; 95% CI 1.15–1.52) and message exposure (aPR 1.88; 95% CI 1.31–2.71).
Several social and structural categories — including occupational groups, income strata, education levels and religious categories — were independently associated with practice in the multivariable model. The report states that these social and structural factors had independent associations, but does not enumerate every category and effect size in the abstract-level text.
Biological comorbidities (for example, self-reported sexually transmitted infections, HIV, tuberculosis, malnutrition) were not associated with preventive practice in adjusted analyses according to the authors’ summary.
The study concludes that Mpox transmission risk in Uganda is concentrated in high-burden districts and overlaps with a substantial comorbidity burden. Although some social and structural determinants were independently associated with protective practice, the primary drivers of reported adequate prevention behavior were the modifiable cognitive factors of comprehensive knowledge and message exposure rather than biological characteristics.
Based on these findings, the authors argue that community-level interventions should prioritize converting near-universal message reach into accurate, actionable knowledge to achieve the greatest protective gains. In other words, improving message content and comprehension may be more effective than relying on message reach alone.
The study reports ethical oversight by Mildmay Uganda Research Ethics Committee. The authors state that participant consent procedures and institutional approvals were followed. Data cannot be made publicly available because of potentially identifying and sensitive participant information; a fully de-identified minimal dataset is available to qualified researchers upon ethical and governance approval via the Mildmay Uganda Research Ethics Committee.
The authors declared no competing interests.
The source abstract does not provide full details on some aspects that may be relevant for interpretation, such as the exact questionnaire items defining “comprehensive knowledge,” the metrics used to classify districts as high- versus low-burden, or the full list and effect sizes for all social and structural categories retained in multivariable models. Those details are not reported in the abstract and would require consultation of the full manuscript or supplementary material.