This study evaluated the Positive Running Program, a peer-led structured physical activity intervention delivered around antiretroviral therapy centers in Karnataka and Tamil Nadu in southern India. The program was proposed as a low-cost supportive intervention where specialist mental health services are scarce, aiming to address the high burden of depression and anxiety among adolescents with perinatally acquired HIV.
The researchers applied a cross-sectional convergent mixed-methods design, integrating quantitative and qualitative data at the interpretive stage to understand who participates and how gendered constraints affect participation and outcomes.
The analytic sample included 150 adolescents and young people with perinatally acquired HIV: 100 boys and young men and 50 girls and young women. Median age was 17 years (interquartile range 15–19). Viral suppression was high in the sample (91% virally suppressed).
Depressive and anxiety symptoms were screened using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7). A score of 5 or above on either instrument was classified as a common mental disorder for the purposes of analysis.
High program adherence was pre-specified as attendance at 65% or more of scheduled sessions. Associations between adherence and mental health outcomes were estimated using logistic regression adjusted for age, including gender-stratified models and an interaction term for adherence-by-gender.
Qualitative data were generated through four focus group discussions involving 28 participants and peer facilitators. Reflexive thematic analysis produced inductive themes, which were interpreted using an intersectional lens and self-determination theory.
Attendance differed by gender. Girls and young women attended fewer sessions on average than boys and young men (mean 61.6% versus 65.6%; p=0.025). Using the pre-specified adherence threshold, 10 of 50 girls (20%) met the ≥65% threshold compared with 57 of 100 boys (57%); this difference was statistically significant (p<0.001).
Mental health screening also differed by gender. A positive depression screen (PHQ-9 ≥5) was more prevalent among girls (33/50, 66%) than boys (43/100, 43%; p=0.009). The prevalence of any common mental disorder (PHQ-9 or GAD-7 ≥5) was 36/50 (72%) among girls versus 52/100 (52%) among boys (p=0.022).
Higher adherence was associated with lower odds of a common mental disorder overall (adjusted odds ratio 0.31, 95% CI 0.13–0.68). In gender-stratified models, higher adherence was associated with lower odds among boys and young men (adjusted OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.14–0.75). Among girls and young women, only 10 participants met the adherence threshold and the resulting estimates were imprecise.
The authors noted that the cross-sectional design precludes causal inference about the direction of the association between attendance and mental health symptoms.
Focus group findings situated constraints on girls' participation upstream of the program itself. Themes identified included:
Household authority over girls' time, with caregivers exerting control that limited girls' ability to attend scheduled sessions.
Restrictions on mobility outside the home, reducing girls' freedom to travel to program activities.
Caregiving obligations placed on girls and young women, which competed with time for participation.
Community disapproval of girls exercising in public, creating social barriers and potential stigma.
Participants and peer facilitators described how these social and familial constraints interacted with adolescent dependence and the need for HIV-related concealment, further reducing girls' autonomy to attend consistently.
The study framed findings through an intersectional lens, treating HIV status, gender, and adolescence as intersecting axes of disadvantage rather than additive factors. The central empirical finding emphasizes participation inequalities: girls were underrepresented among participants and attended less consistently, clustering just below the predefined high-adherence threshold.
Using self-determination theory, the authors interpreted that the program supported competence and relatedness for those who attended but did little to secure the autonomy girls needed to attend regularly. In other words, the program could benefit those present but did not address upstream gendered barriers that limited girls' ability to be present.
Key limitations reported by the authors include the cross-sectional study design, which prevents causal conclusions about whether higher adherence reduces common mental disorders or whether lower symptom burden facilitates attendance. The small number of girls meeting the high adherence threshold produced imprecise estimates in gender-stratified analyses.
Ethical approvals were obtained from the Institutional Review Boards of the Y.R. Gaitonde Centre for AIDS Research and Education (YRGCARE), Chennai, India (#YRG375), and the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health (#IRB00023077). The authors declared no competing interests. The de-identified quantitative dataset and qualitative codebook/excerpts are available as supplementary materials; full transcripts are not publicly released due to de-identification and consent constraints.
The authors conclude that peer-led physical activity programs in this setting should treat gender inequality not as background context but as a determinant of participation and a central target of program design. Interventions aiming to support mental health through physical activity should consider how household authority, restricted mobility, caregiving roles, and community norms differentially constrain girls, and incorporate measures to increase girls' autonomy and safe opportunities to attend.
Recognizing unequal starting lines—where girls face reduced opportunity to participate—is essential to ensure equitable reach and potential benefit of peer-led physical activity interventions for adolescents living with HIV.