Seasonal influenza and COVID‑19 vaccination programmes remain central to reducing morbidity and mortality in older adults. This preprint used a participatory surveillance cohort to describe recent vaccination attitudes and to identify predictors of uptake for both seasonal influenza and SARS‑CoV‑2 (COVID‑19) vaccines during the 2023–2024 and 2024–2025 autumn–winter campaigns among UK adults aged 65 years and older who were eligible for both vaccines.
Analyses used data from the UK FluSurvey participatory surveillance system. The study population comprised FluSurvey participants aged ≥65 years who were eligible for both influenza and COVID‑19 vaccination in the two consecutive autumn–winter seasonal campaigns (2023–2024 and 2024–2025). The preprint does not provide detailed sample sizes or participant flow in the abstract; these details may appear in the full text or supplementary material referenced in the preprint record.
Descriptive analyses examined self‑reported attitudes to influenza vaccination. Participants were asked about motivations for vaccination and perceived barriers. The most frequently reported motivations included identifying as belonging to a risk group and wanting to reduce the risk of influenza. Frequently reported barriers included beliefs that vaccination might impede building natural immunity and concerns about vaccine safety and adverse effects.
The study used logistic regression to examine predictors of vaccination uptake for influenza and COVID‑19 in each season. Covariates included age, sex, socioeconomic status, educational attainment, employment status, transport, smoking and presence of chronic conditions. Models were adjusted for confounders, though the abstract does not list the full adjustment set or model specifications; readers are referred to the full preprint for modeling details and sensitivity analyses.
A prominent and consistent finding was a strong positive association between receipt of one vaccine and receipt of the other within the same season. Specifically, individuals vaccinated against COVID‑19 were substantially more likely to report receiving an influenza vaccination, and the reciprocal association was similarly strong. Reported adjusted odds ratios (aORs) were:
For the 2023–2024 season: aOR = 13.90 (95% CI 9.28–21.17) for COVID‑19 vaccination predicting influenza uptake; the reciprocal estimate was aOR = 13.91 (95% CI 9.30–21.19).
For the 2024–2025 season: aOR = 8.54 (95% CI 5.82–12.60) for COVID‑19 vaccination predicting influenza uptake; the reciprocal estimate was aOR = 8.52 (95% CI 5.81–12.58).
These large adjusted odds ratios indicate very strong co‑receipt behavior between the two vaccines among this cohort in both seasons examined.
Lower educational attainment was associated with lower odds of COVID‑19 vaccination in both seasons. Reported adjusted odds ratios were 0.59 (95% CI 0.45–0.78) for 2023–2024 and 0.56 (95% CI 0.39–0.79) for 2024–2025, indicating reduced odds of COVID‑19 vaccine uptake among participants with lower education. The abstract states that other results were weaker or varied by season but does not provide full effect estimates for other socioeconomic or demographic covariates.
Aside from the strong mutual association between influenza and COVID‑19 vaccination and the education effect on COVID‑19 uptake, the authors report that other associations were either weaker in magnitude or showed variation between the two seasons. The abstract does not provide granular results for every covariate (for example, age strata, sex, smoking status, transport or individual chronic conditions), so readers should consult the main text or supplementary materials for full tables and season‑specific estimates.
Authors declared no competing interests and state that relevant ethical guidelines were followed; datasets used were de‑identified prior to use in the study. The preprint notes that participant data cannot be shared publicly under the FluSurvey privacy notice, and provides a link for specific data requests via UKHSA protected data access procedures. The abstract does not detail limitations or potential sources of bias (such as selection bias inherent to participatory surveillance, self‑reporting of vaccination status or unmeasured confounding); these likely appear in the full manuscript.
Findings highlight recent attitudes, common vaccination motivations and barriers among older FluSurvey participants and identify strong clustering of uptake between influenza and COVID‑19 vaccines. The observed association suggests that individuals who accept one vaccine are very likely to accept the other, while lower educational attainment is a factor linked to reduced COVID‑19 uptake. The authors suggest these insights may inform approaches to improve vaccination coverage in the population; specific operational recommendations are not provided in the abstract and would require review of the complete preprint and supplementary materials.
The preprint references supplementary material and external links for data and code in the medRxiv record. For specific data access requests the authors direct readers to UKHSA guidance on accessing protected data. The article is a preprint and has not undergone peer review; the authors note this and caution that the findings should not be used to guide clinical practice without further validation.