This preprint reports a longitudinal observational study that examined how emotional distress and pain relate over time in people living with HIV in a low-resource setting. The authors focused on within-individual weekly fluctuations and tested whether distress and pain predicted each other from one week to the next.
Seventy-two participants with virally suppressed HIV were enrolled. At baseline participants reported either no pain or persistent pain. The cohort had a median age of 43 years (IQR 37–51), 71% were female (n=51), and 63% (n=45) were unemployed. Data were collected for up to 49 weeks.
Participants provided weekly remote ratings on 0–10 visual analogue scales for three items: overall distress, worst pain intensity, and average pain intensity. The study used these repeated measures to visualise within-individual trajectories, compute group-level correlations, and model temporal (week-to-week) prediction between distress and pain.
Within individual participants, distress and pain scores fluctuated together over time. At the group level, distress correlated positively with same-week pain intensity: Spearman’s rho for distress and worst pain was 0.66 (95% CI 0.60–0.72, p<0.001) and for distress and average pain was 0.70 (95% CI 0.64–0.75, p<0.001). These correlations indicate strong concurrent associations between emotional distress and both worst and average pain ratings during the same week.
To evaluate temporal directionality, the investigators used cumulative link mixed models to test whether distress predicted pain in the following week and whether pain predicted distress the following week.
Higher worst pain intensity in one week predicted greater distress in the next week (odds ratio [OR] = 1.42; 95% CI 1.17–1.71; p<0.001).
Higher average pain intensity in one week also predicted greater distress in the following week (OR = 1.43; 95% CI 1.20–1.71; p<0.001).
Higher distress in one week predicted greater worst pain intensity in the next week (OR = 1.25; 95% CI 1.07–1.46; p=0.023).
Distress did not significantly predict average pain intensity in the following week (OR = 1.19; 95% CI 1.01–1.40; p=0.152).
Taken together, these results indicate a bidirectional temporal relationship between distress and worst pain intensity, whereas the temporal relationship between distress and average pain was not supported in the direction from distress to pain.
The authors conclude that pain and emotional distress are closely linked and can influence each other over time in people living with HIV. Because the bidirectional effect was observed for worst pain but not for average pain, measurement choice may affect detection of temporal relationships. The findings support attention to both pain and emotional distress in HIV research and clinical care, particularly in low-resource settings where the study was conducted.
Clinicians and researchers should be aware that higher pain intensity in a given week may increase emotional distress the following week and that elevated distress may, in turn, increase subsequent worst pain. This temporal interplay suggests potential value in integrated assessment and interventions that address both pain and emotional distress.
The study is reported as a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. Ethical approval was obtained from the University of Cape Town Faculty of Health Sciences Human Research Ethics Committee (approval number: 764/2019) and the City of Cape Town Health Department (ref: 24699). Funding sources declared in the report include the Fogarty International Center (K43TW011442), the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (K24NS126570), and the National Research Foundation (119238). Competing interests and author declarations are reported by the authors in the source.
Note: This summary reflects data and statements provided in the preprint. As the article has not undergone peer review, findings should be interpreted with that context in mind and not be used alone to guide clinical practice.