Journal of the American Heart Association, Volume 15, Issue 9 , May 5, 2026. BackgroundMavacamten improves symptoms in obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, but real‐world prescription patterns, safety profile, and the effect of atrial fibrillation (AF) on outcomes remain unclear.MethodsAn observational multicenter analysis using patient‐level data from the TriNetX database (2011–2023) compared patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy treated with mavacamten versus those not treated with mavacamten (controls).
Multivariable logistic regression identified predictors of mavacamten use. Propensity‐score matching was used to reduce confounding bias.
Outcomes included acute heart failure, left ventricular systolic dysfunction, cardiovascular hospitalization, new‐onset AF, and all‐cause mortality. Outcomes were also stratified by AF history.ResultsAmong 15 145 patients, 509 (3.5%) received mavacamten; 502 matched to 1475 weighted 1:3 controls (equivalent to 502).
Black patients were significantly less likely to receive mavacamten compared with White patients (odds ratio, 0.45 [95% CI, 0.33–0.63]). Of the 502 mavacamten recipients, 4.8% experienced acute heart failure, 8.3% experienced systolic dysfunction, 10.8% experienced cardiovascular hospitalization, 6.4% experienced new‐onset AF, and 1.4% died.
Journal of the American Heart Association published a clinical update in Cardiology on 27 Apr 2026.
The item focuses on Mavacamten in Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: National Insights on Access and Safety Profile From Real‐World Data.
Review the original article for the full source wording and details.