Shift work in healthcare is linked to emotional dysregulation, reduced alertness, and cognitive effects and is recognized clinically via Shift Work Disorder (SWD) in DSM-5. This investigation evaluated how individual differences in sleep disturbances and chronotype distinctness relate to neuropsychiatric symptom profiles in a cohort of 102 National Health Service (NHS) shift-working nurses. The authors aimed to disentangle the pathways by which sleep and chronotype amplitude influence mood, emotional reactivity, and cognition under different shift schedules.
The study derived latent constructs from participant questionnaire data and cognitive assessments. Key instruments reported in the manuscript were:
These observed measures were used to form latent variables representing sleep disturbance, chronotype distinctness, mood disorder symptoms, depression, emotional reactivity, and cognitive function.
The authors applied Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) to test hypothesized relationships among latent constructs. Correlations between constructs were identified and translated into separate SEMs for day-shift and rotating-shift worker groups. Models tested direct effects and path significance, and overall model fit was evaluated (details of fit indices are reported in the manuscript). The approach allowed simultaneous assessment of how sleep and chronotype distinctness predict adverse neuropsychiatric outcomes.
For nurses working day shifts, the SEM indicated that sleep disturbances were the primary predictor of fatigue-related symptomatology. In this group, pathways from the sleep latent construct mapped most strongly onto outcomes described as fatigue-based symptoms. The manuscript reports that, within the day-shift model, sleep-driven effects dominated the observed variance in fatigue measures rather than chronotype amplitude.
In contrast, the rotating-shift model showed that chronotype distinctness was the dominant predictor of adverse outcomes in this group. Greater chronotype amplitude on the CCQ was associated with increased severity of mood disorder symptoms, heightened emotional reactivity, and measurable cognitive impairments. The authors conclude that chronotype distinctness, more than generalized sleep disturbance, determined the severity of emotional and cognitive disruption among rotating-shift nurses.
From these models the authors infer that high chronotype distinctness represents an individual vulnerability to adverse neuropsychiatric effects when exposed to night or rotating-shift schedules. Whereas sleep disturbance remained important—particularly for fatigue in day workers—the amplitude of an individual’s circadian preference appears to modulate susceptibility to mood and cognitive sequelae under irregular schedules.
The manuscript suggests that screening for chronotype distinctness could identify staff at elevated risk when rostering for night or rotating shifts. Interventions designed to mitigate adverse effects should consider chronotype-specific remediation, tailoring circadian and sleep-focused strategies to individual chronotype amplitude. The authors recommend that workplace policies and remedial programs incorporate chronotype-informed approaches to reduce emotional and cognitive disruption among shift workers.
The work is reported as a clinical preprint and has not undergone peer review; the authors explicitly note it should not be used to guide clinical practice. Ethical approval was obtained from the Research Ethics Committee of King’s College London. The manuscript states that all data produced are contained within the paper and declares funding from the National Institute for Health Research. Specific numerical model fit statistics or additional subgroup details are reported in the manuscript but are not reproduced here beyond the main directional findings. The authors also disclose competing interests related to cognitive assessment technology companies for named investigators.
Overall, the study presents SEM evidence in a cohort of 102 NHS nurses that chronotype distinctness is a key determinant of mood and cognitive disruption in rotating-shift work, while sleep disturbance primarily explains fatigue in day-shift contexts. The authors advocate for chronotype-aware interventions, pending further validation and peer review.