Temporal lobe epilepsy surgery (TLS) is an established treatment for patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy. While seizure outcomes can be favorable, surgery is frequently accompanied by postoperative cognitive changes, particularly in verbal memory. A central unresolved clinical question is how to operationalize and distinguish average memory decline from severe memory decline after surgery, and how these distinct levels of decline differentially affect patients’ everyday lives, sense of self, and long-term functioning.
This study addressed that question by combining quantitative, regression-based normative criteria for postoperative memory change with in-depth qualitative interviews of patients who experienced either expected (average) or unexpectedly severe memory deterioration.
The investigators derived regression-based, patient-derived normative change criteria for postoperative verbal memory loss from a single-center cohort comprising 806 patients. Using these normative thresholds, they identified patients who fell into two outcome ranges: an average memory decline (AMD) range defined as the 20th to 75th percentiles, and a severe memory decline (SMD) range defined as below the 5th percentile.
From these ranges the team selected two matched groups of four patients each (four with AMD and four with SMD) for qualitative inquiry. Selection was designed to contrast the lived experiences associated with typical versus marked memory loss using patient-derived benchmarks rather than arbitrary cutoffs.
Researchers conducted in-depth, semi-structured narrative interviews with the selected patients. Interview transcripts were examined using qualitative content analysis that combined deductive and inductive approaches. This method allowed the team to identify both predefined domains of interest (deductive) and emergent themes arising directly from patient narratives (inductive).
The analysis focused on how patients perceived and integrated memory decline into daily routines, self-concept, treatment expectations, and need for ongoing support or rehabilitation after surgery.
Narratives from the AMD group emphasized recovery and continuity. Patients described integrating the cognitive changes from surgery into a continuing sense of self rather than experiencing a ruptured identity. Memory changes in this group were generally manageable within daily life, and patients depicted the surgical outcome as compatible with their expected life trajectories.
In the AMD accounts, postoperative experiences aligned with expectations and with the broader goals of seizure reduction, allowing patients to adapt without extensive disruption to autonomy or roles.
By contrast, patients in the SMD group described persistent cognitive symptoms and a sense of ongoing illness despite meaningful reductions in seizure frequency. Severe memory decline in these narratives was associated with substantial disruption to identity, autonomy, and anticipated life plans.
Participants with SMD reported feeling that they had received limited information preoperatively about the possibility of such severe cognitive outcomes. They also described insufficient psychological preparation for life after surgery and a lack of structured postoperative cognitive rehabilitation. These factors compounded the challenges of adapting to memory loss and maintaining quality of life.
The study illustrates a differential pattern in how cognitive sequelae are integrated after TLS. For patients with AMD, cognitive changes were commonly assimilated into daily routines and the broader post-surgical recovery narrative. For patients with SMD, memory loss functioned as a persistent, identity-altering condition that required continued treatment and support beyond seizure control.
These qualitative distinctions highlight that equivalent seizure outcomes do not guarantee equivalent postoperative quality of life when cognitive outcomes differ substantially.
The findings indicate that current surgical pathways may not sufficiently anticipate or address the cognitive sequelae experienced by patients who develop severe memory decline. The authors suggest that improved expectation management, more structured preoperative counseling about potential cognitive risks, and organized postoperative cognitive rehabilitation may facilitate adaptation and improve long-term functioning and quality of life after TLS.
Because this work links normative, quantitative thresholds to patient-reported lived experience, it supports the value of combining objective cognitive-change criteria with qualitative follow-up to inform clinical care and counseling.
The study received approval from the Ethics Committee of the University Hospital Bonn (approval number reported in the source). All participants provided written informed consent, and the study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.
Qualitative interview data are not publicly available because of confidentiality concerns and the potential risk of participant identification. The interview guideline and coding scheme can be requested from the corresponding author.
Several authors disclosed industry-related fees or professional activities unrelated to the manuscript; other authors reported no competing interests. The manuscript is a preprint and has not been certified by peer review; the source cautions that the findings should not be used to guide clinical practice without further validation.