Feasibility of SMS Screening for Mood Disturbances After Minor Stroke

Feasibility and study design

This research assessed whether a brief SMS-based questionnaire is a practicable tool to screen for mood disturbances, fatigue, and cognitive complaints in patients after a minor stroke. One hundred patients with minor stroke were sent SMS questions beginning 15 days before their scheduled clinical follow-up, which occurred around 3–6 weeks post stroke. Responses to the SMS items were compared with established validated instruments: the Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale (HAD), the Center of Epidemiological Studies Depression scale (CES-D), the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI), and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). Associations between SMS responses and validated scales were examined using group comparisons and correlation analyses.

Participation and adherence patterns

Two-thirds of the enrolled patients responded to at least one SMS item. The analysis identified an association between stroke severity and adherence: lower stroke severity predicted higher likelihood of responding to the SMS screening. The study reports response uptake but does not provide more granular timing or completion-rate breakdowns beyond the overall responder proportion.

Comparison with validated scales for mood

Among participants who responded to the SMS screening, validated mood scales indicated that 37.8% had probable depression and 34.07% had probable anxiety. SMS-based mood items identified 29.3% of respondents as reporting depression and 29.4% as reporting anxiety. Importantly, SMS-identified depression and anxiety were strongly associated with higher scores on the CES-D and HAD instruments (p < 0.001), supporting concurrent validity of short SMS mood questions against established clinical scales.

Findings on fatigue screening

SMS-reported fatigue intensity demonstrated a moderate correlation with validated fatigue measures and with mood scores, as captured by the MFI and mood scales. This indicates that simple SMS items about fatigue intensity can reflect patient-reported fatigue and are related to mood disturbance, though the correlations are described as moderate rather than strong. The study ties SMS fatigue reports to both fatigue and affective measures but does not provide detailed correlation coefficients in the summary.

Findings on cognitive complaints

SMS-identified cognitive complaints were associated with higher MFI Mental fatigue scores (p = 0.008), suggesting a link between self-reported cognitive complaints by SMS and subjective mental fatigue. However, these SMS cognitive complaints did not correspond to objective cognitive performance as measured by the MoCA. This discordance led the authors to conclude that the SMS approach is less suitable for accurate cognitive screening in this patient group.

Strengths, limitations, and implications

Strengths:

• The intervention is low-cost, accessible, and easily deployable using widely available mobile phone SMS technology.
• The study compared SMS responses directly with multiple validated instruments—CES-D, HAD, MFI, and MoCA—enabling assessment of concurrent validity for mood and fatigue.

Limitations noted by the authors:

• Only two-thirds of patients responded to at least one SMS item, and adherence varied by stroke severity, which may introduce selection bias toward less impaired participants.
• SMS items correlated poorly with objective cognitive testing (MoCA), limiting the utility of SMS for cognitive screening after minor stroke.
• The report notes the need for larger and more diverse samples and for refined SMS measures before generalizing findings or implementing SMS screening at scale; precise psychometric data and broader demographic or clinical subgroup analyses were not reported in the summary.

Implications:

• Short SMS questionnaires appear feasible and reasonably valid for identifying depression and anxiety after minor stroke and could support earlier detection and triage for clinical follow-up.
• SMS fatigue items show potential but require further validation.
• SMS-based cognitive items require substantial refinement or substitution with other remote assessment tools if objective cognitive screening is desired.

Ethics, data availability, and next steps

The study received ethical approval from the Research Ethics Committee of the University Hospital of Bordeaux (reference CER-BDX 2024-75). The authors declared no competing interests. The paper states that all relevant ethical guidelines were followed and that participant consent was obtained. Study data are available upon reasonable request to the authors.

The authors recommend larger, more diverse studies with refined SMS measures to confirm feasibility and validity, and to evaluate scalability of SMS screening as part of post-stroke follow-up pathways. Specific next-step protocols, sample-size estimates, or timelines were not reported in the source summary.