This retrospective analysis assessed whether biological sex was associated with functional outcome following superficial temporal artery to middle cerebral artery (STA-MCA bypass) performed for atherosclerotic cerebrovascular disease (ACVD). The study included adult patients undergoing extracranial-to-intracranial (EC-IC) bypass between 2012 and 2025 with available follow-up data. The primary endpoint was functional status measured by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at the latest follow-up and was analyzed using proportional odds regression. Multivariable models adjusted for age, preoperative mRS, and vascular comorbidities.
A total of 140 patients met inclusion criteria; 30.7% were female. The authors report sex-based differences in disease morphology: females more frequently had multivessel and stenotic disease, whereas males more often presented with isolated internal carotid artery occlusion. These baseline differences in vascular pathology indicate heterogeneous disease patterns between sexes in this surgical cohort.
Short-term outcomes showed a higher 30-day risk of symptomatic ischemic stroke in females compared with males (9.3% vs. 1.0%). At a median follow-up of 13.5 months, ischemic events continued to predominate among females (16.3% vs. 7.2%), while hemorrhagic events occurred exclusively in males (5.2%). These event distributions suggest sex-specific patterns in postoperative complications following STA-MCA bypass in patients with ACVD.
The primary outcome was the mRS at the most recent follow-up. The authors used proportional odds regression to estimate the association between sex and functional outcome. Models were adjusted for established covariates including age, preoperative mRS, and vascular comorbidities. The reporting focuses on odds ratios (ORs), 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and p-values for key predictors.
In adjusted analyses, female sex was independently associated with worse functional outcome after STA-MCA bypass (OR 2.59, 95% CI 1.28–5.30, p=0.008). Preoperative functional status was the strongest determinant of outcome: higher preoperative mRS predicted poorer postoperative outcome (OR 4.30, 95% CI 3.07–6.18, p<0.001). The models accounted for age and vascular comorbidities, and the association between female sex and worse outcome remained significant after these adjustments.
A subgroup analysis evaluated cerebrovascular reserve capacity (CVRC) as a potential mediator of outcome. Adjusted analysis detected no significant association between CVRC and functional outcome (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.24–2.70, p=0.721). The authors therefore report that the observed sex difference in outcome was independent of measured hemodynamic impairment by CVRC in the analyzed subgroup.
This report is presented as a preprint and has not undergone peer review. The authors declared no competing interests. They state that the study received ethics committee approval from Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin covering both a retrospective cohort (EA2/139/12) and a prospective registry (EA2/178/18), and that participant consent procedures were followed as required.
Limitations explicitly inherent to the reported design include its retrospective nature and reliance on available follow-up; the preprint does not provide further granular methodological details beyond the summary of analyses. The authors conclude that female sex is a clinically relevant determinant of outcome after EC-IC bypass for ACVD and recommend that sex be considered in future risk stratification and trial design.
Within this single-cohort retrospective series, sex-specific differences in disease morphology, perioperative ischemic risk, and longer-term functional outcome after STA-MCA bypass were observed, with female sex independently associated with worse mRS outcomes after adjustment. Preoperative functional status remained the strongest predictor of postoperative outcome. The findings support consideration of sex in risk assessment and in the design of future studies evaluating cerebrovascular bypass interventions.
Note: This article is a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. All data and statements above are taken from the source preprint; no additional data, numeric details, or subgroup breakdowns beyond those reported in the source were invented or inferred.