Physiological mirror activity (pMA) is involuntary muscle activation on the contralateral side during unilateral voluntary movement in neurologically healthy people. Corticomuscular coherence (CMC) quantifies synchronized neural oscillations between cortex and muscle, and may reflect cortical contributions to motor control. This cross-sectional study aimed to investigate the relationship between pMA and gamma-band CMC during a finger dexterity task and to compare those relationships between healthy young and older adults.
The study enrolled right-handed participants split into two groups as reported: 31 young adults and 24 older adults. All participants performed a left-hand finger dexterity task. The source article did not provide additional demographic breakdowns (for example, exact ages, sex distribution, or exclusion criteria) beyond handedness and group sizes.
Electroencephalogram (EEG) signals were recorded from scalp positions C3 and C4. Electromyogram (EMG) signals were collected from bilateral finger flexor and extensor muscles. The design targeted task-related EEG–EMG pairs to estimate corticomuscular coupling during the active left-hand task.
pMA was quantified as the change in right-hand EMG amplitude from rest to task, capturing involuntary activation in the non-performing hand. Gamma-band CMC was computed from task-related EEG–EMG pairs; the source specifically reports analysis in the gamma frequency band. The study analyzed associations between the magnitude of pMA and gamma-band CMC for specific EEG–EMG combinations (notably C3– and C4–right flexors, and C3–left flexor).
The main reported findings described age-dependent relationships between pMA and gamma-band CMC:
In the young adult group, greater pMA was associated with lower gamma-band CMC for the C3–right flexor and C4–right flexor EEG–EMG pairs.
In the older adult group, greater pMA was associated with higher gamma-band CMC for the C3–left flexor pair.
The source article reported these directional associations but did not provide detailed statistics (for example, correlation coefficients, confidence intervals, or p-values) in the summary text provided here.
The authors propose contrasting mechanisms to explain the observed age differences. For young adults, the inverse relationship between pMA and CMC (greater pMA with lower CMC for right flexors) is interpreted as consistent with active monitoring and inhibitory control over the non-performing hand: efficient cortical coupling to the task-related muscles may support suppression of involuntary mirror activity.
For older adults, the positive association between pMA and CMC (greater pMA with higher CMC for the C3–left flexor pair) is interpreted as possibly reflecting increased mobilization of the ipsilateral motor cortex during unilateral movement. In this view, recruitment of ipsilateral cortical resources in older adults may contribute to the emergence of mirror activity rather than suppress it.
These interpretations indicate that neuromuscular mechanisms underlying pMA during finger dexterity differ between younger and older healthy adults. The summary in the source did not report mechanistic experiments or causal evidence; conclusions are correlational and inferential based on the observed associations.
The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Ethics Committee of Kyoto Tachibana University (approval number: 24-83). Informed consent was obtained from all participants. The authors declared no competing interests. All data produced in the study are available on reasonable request to the authors. Funding was provided by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, with multiple grant numbers listed in the source.
This work reports that associations between pMA and gamma-band CMC during a left-hand finger dexterity task differ by age group: in younger adults greater pMA aligns with lower CMC for contralateral flexors, whereas in older adults greater pMA aligns with higher CMC for an ipsilateral pairing. The findings suggest age-dependent differences in cortical involvement and inhibitory control related to mirror activity during unilateral manual tasks. These results are correlative and derive from healthy right-handed participants; the source did not report broader clinical implications, longitudinal data, or intervention outcomes. Further work would be required to determine causality, generalizability across tasks and populations, and potential relevance for motor rehabilitation strategies.