Calcification within carotid atherosclerotic plaques has been proposed as a plaque-stabilizing feature, but prior studies have reported inconsistent results. The authors aimed to determine whether histologically defined calcification subtypes—sheet, nodular, and total calcification—are associated with distinct cerebrovascular event phenotypes and whether these associations differ by sex.
This analysis used data from the prospective Helsinki Carotid Endarterectomy Study 2. Carotid plaques were obtained from 483 patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy; 328 of these patients were men. Plaques were analyzed histologically with AI-based quantification to derive percentage measures of sheet calcification, nodular calcification, and total calcification.
Neurological symptom status at the time of surgery was categorized into five groups: asymptomatic (n=167), stroke (n=132), transient ischemic attack (TIA) (n=79), retinal infarction (n=24), and amaurosis fugax (n=81). The investigators compared calcification measures with patient characteristics, plaque morphology, computed tomography angiography (CTA)-based calcium score, and neurological symptom subtype, and performed sex-stratified analyses.
In the cohort, women demonstrated greater plaque calcification than men. The reported median total calcification was 15.8% in women versus 10.8% in men (p=0.002). Detailed demographic and other patient characteristic distributions were reported in the source but are not reproduced here beyond the sex-based calcification comparison.
When the cohort was analyzed as a whole, plaques from symptomatic patients showed lower total and sheet calcification compared with plaques from asymptomatic patients. This overall observation suggests that higher total and sheet calcification are more common in asymptomatic plaques.
Comparisons between specific neurological subtypes revealed additional relationships. In the entire cohort, plaques associated with retinal infarction had higher nodular calcification than plaques associated with stroke (median nodular calcification 9.6% versus 1.2%; p=0.004).
The observed associations between calcification and symptom status differed by sex. The overall association of lower total and sheet calcification in symptomatic versus asymptomatic plaques was driven primarily by male patients. Specifically, among men, plaques associated with stroke had markedly lower sheet calcification than asymptomatic plaques (median sheet calcification 3.4% versus 8.4%; p<0.001). In men, low total and sheet calcification were associated with stroke.
In contrast, among women, a different pattern emerged: plaques associated with TIA showed higher total calcification than plaques associated with stroke (median total calcification 22.7% versus 13.5%; p=0.024). Thus, higher total calcification in women was linked to TIA rather than stroke.
Histological total calcification correlated with CTA-derived calcium score (p<0.001). The authors report that radiological calcification measures showed corresponding associations with neurological symptom type, supporting concordance between histological and imaging assessments of plaque calcification.
Across this prospective series of carotid endarterectomy specimens, symptomatic plaques had lower total and sheet calcification than asymptomatic plaques. The data suggest that the relationship between calcification and cerebrovascular events is nuanced: calcification may act as a stabilizing plaque feature overall, but its clinical implications depend on the morphological subtype of calcification and differ by sex and the neurological syndrome.
Key sex-specific observations included an association between low total and sheet calcification and stroke in men, higher nodular calcification with retinal infarction in the overall cohort, and higher total calcification associated with TIA in women. These findings imply that assessing calcification subtype—rather than presence or burden alone—may provide additional pathophysiologic and potentially prognostic information, and that sex should be considered in such evaluations.
The source article presents these associations but does not specify causal mechanisms or clinical management changes; the study design is observational and based on endarterectomy specimens.
The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Medicine of the Hospital District of Helsinki and Uusimaa. The authors declared no competing interests. Individual-level data cannot be shared publicly because of patient confidentiality and data-governance restrictions; aggregated data are provided in the article and supplemental material.