Comprehension deficits in morphosyntax and transitivity are not consistently reflected in current diagnostic guidelines for primary progressive aphasia (PPA) or typical Alzheimer’s Disease (AD), despite prior studies indicating delayed sensitivity or insensitivity in these populations. Much of the literature has focused on English, a language with relatively reduced inflectional morphology that may under-detect comprehension impairments present in morphologically richer languages. The present study aimed to develop and evaluate a computer-based Spanish grammaticality judgment task to probe comprehension of nominal and verbal inflection, transitivity, and word order in Spanish-speaking patients with neurodegenerative language disorders.
The authors designed a computerized acceptability judgment paradigm that explicitly tests comprehension across three linguistic domains: the nominal and verbal inflectional paradigm (morphosyntax), transitivity (argument structure of verbs), and word order. The task requires participants to evaluate sentences for grammatical acceptability, contrasting grammatically correct items with sentences containing violations in the targeted domains. The choice of Spanish was motivated by its richer inflectional system, which can reveal deficits not captured by English-focused probes.
Spanish-speaking patient groups included the three clinical variants of PPA—non-fluent/agrammatic, logopenic, and semantic—and a group with typical Alzheimer’s Disease. The abstract does not report specific sample sizes or demographic details; those details are available in the full manuscript and supplementary materials but were not included in the provided source excerpt.
Psychometric evaluation of the task indicated good sensitivity and internal consistency. Task accuracy showed a moderate correlation with established language and neuropsychological measures, supporting the test’s convergent validity. These properties suggest the paradigm is sufficiently robust for detecting language comprehension deficits in the targeted clinical populations.
Across the four clinical groups, participants largely retained the ability to endorse grammatical sentences. However, they exhibited a selective difficulty in rejecting unacceptable or ungrammatical sentences. This asymmetry suggests that impairments manifest more clearly as reduced detection or rejection of violations rather than a global inability to recognize grammatical forms.
Both the AD group and the three PPA variants demonstrated impaired comprehension for inflectional morphology and transitivity information. In contrast, sensitivity to word order violations was comparatively preserved. These results indicate that morphosyntactic processing and verb argument structure are vulnerable in neurodegenerative language decline across diagnostic categories, while basic word order cues may remain relatively intact, at least as measured by acceptability judgments in Spanish.
Exploratory analyses examined cognitive domains associated with sentence evaluation performance. The study found differential associations of task performance with short-term memory, working memory, and verbal semantics within and across clinical groups. The abstract reports these associations qualitatively but does not supply effect sizes or detailed statistics in the excerpt provided; such numerical details are available in the full report.
Voxel-based morphometry (VBM) analyses identified the left posterior temporal cortex as the primary neuroanatomical correlate of grammaticality judgment performance. This finding links functional deficits in morphosyntactic and transitivity comprehension to structural changes in a left temporal region implicated in sentence-level language processing.
The results extend prior English-language findings to Spanish and demonstrate that deficits in morphosyntax and transitivity are a robust, cross-linguistically consistent feature of language impairment in neurodegenerative disease. The selective difficulty rejecting ungrammatical sentences further refines the behavioral profile of these disorders. The authors emphasize the importance of developing and validating language-sensitive assessment tools tailored to underrepresented languages to improve detection and characterization of language deficits across diverse clinical populations.
The study obtained ethical approval from the Ethics Committee of the Hospital Sant Pau. The authors state that all necessary participant consent procedures were followed. Data generated by the study are available upon reasonable request to the authors. Several authors disclosed competing interests, including advisory roles, speaker honoraria, and patents relevant to neurodegenerative disease markers; other authors reported no competing interests. These declarations are provided in the source material.