Stroke is a major cause of premature death and disability in sub-Saharan Africa. Effective primary and secondary prevention depends on prompt recognition of stroke symptoms and awareness of modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors. The authors evaluated community-level stroke knowledge among middle-aged adults identified as at risk, with the aim of identifying gaps in symptom and risk-factor recognition and the factors independently associated with adequate combined stroke knowledge.
The investigation was a community-based cross-sectional study conducted among 316 adults aged 40–65 years in a semi-urban Nigerian community. Data were collected using interviewer-administered questionnaires. The study population definition, sampling approach, and specific community characteristics beyond the age range and semi-urban setting were not detailed in the abstract.
The primary outcome was combined stroke knowledge, defined by the authors as adequate recognition of both stroke symptoms and stroke risk factors. Respondent awareness of stroke (familiarity with the condition) was recorded separately. Statistical analysis included Pearson's chi-square tests and multivariable binary logistic regression to identify independent predictors of combined stroke knowledge.
Awareness of stroke was high: 296 of 316 respondents (93.7%) reported being aware of stroke. Despite this, only 112 respondents (35.4%) demonstrated good combined knowledge of both symptoms and risk factors.
Among specific symptoms, the most frequently correctly identified item was sudden weakness of the face, arm, or leg (78.6%). Other common stroke signs were less well recognised: sudden visual disturbance was identified by 34.1% of respondents, and severe headache by 37.6%. These results indicate uneven recognition of classic stroke presentations within this at-risk population.
Recognition of stroke risk factors was similarly variable. Hypertension was the most commonly identified risk factor (87.6%), reflecting relative public awareness of high blood pressure as a stroke risk. By contrast, atrial fibrillation was identified by only 32.9% of respondents. Alcohol use and diabetes mellitus were also under-recognised as risk factors, with 51.4% and 57.0% acknowledgement respectively. The pattern suggests strong understanding of some cardiovascular contributors to stroke but persistent gaps around arrhythmia-related and metabolic risk factors.
In multivariable binary logistic regression, two factors were independently associated with higher odds of good combined stroke knowledge:
Unexpectedly, post-secondary education was inversely associated with good combined stroke knowledge (aOR 0.37, 95% CI 0.15–0.93; p = 0.034). The abstract does not provide detail to explain this association, such as education subcategories, occupational status, or health-information access patterns.
The study authors conclude that, in this semi-urban at-risk middle-aged population, general awareness of stroke is high but comprehensive knowledge of both stroke symptoms and risk factors remains suboptimal. The findings support targeted public health actions to improve stroke literacy, particularly around less-recognised symptoms (sudden visual disturbance, severe headache) and under-appreciated risk factors (atrial fibrillation, diabetes, alcohol).
The authors suggest integrating structured stroke education into existing cardiovascular prevention services as a practical strategy for improving stroke knowledge among high-risk groups. This recommendation aligns with the observed positive association between heart disease knowledge and stroke knowledge, and with the finding that individuals with diagnosed hypertension had better combined knowledge.
The study reports ethical approval from the Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences Ethics Committee, University of Nigeria (UNNFP-HREC/2025/012). The authors declare no competing interests. The abstract states that all relevant data used for the study will be made available on request from the authors.
The abstract provides limited methodological detail in several areas. The source did not report the community sampling frame, response rate, questionnaire validation, or specifics on how ‘adequate’ recognition was operationalised beyond the combined definition. Information on potential confounders included in the multivariable model beyond the variables reported, and on the direction or reasons for the inverse association with post-secondary education, were not provided in the abstract. These details would need to be confirmed by consulting the full text.
In this semi-urban Nigerian sample of adults aged 40–65 years, improving comprehensive stroke literacy remains a priority despite high general awareness. Interventions that build on existing cardiovascular prevention programs and that emphasise lesser-known symptoms and risk factors—particularly atrial fibrillation and diabetes—may strengthen early recognition and prevention efforts in similar high-risk communities.