Routine adolescent physical examinations commonly include body mass index (BMI), uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), and resting heart rate (RHR). Despite frequent measurement, the interrelationships among these three indicators and how they vary by age and sex across adolescence have not been fully characterized. This multicentre retrospective cohort study examined whether BMI independently correlates with UCVA and RHR, and whether age and sex modify those relationships.
Investigators retrospectively analyzed 130,832 screening records from adolescents aged 8–17 years collected between 2022 and 2024. The study applied mixed-effects models to account for clustering and potential confounding, and conducted stratified analyses to assess effect modification by age and sex. Reported outcomes include the magnitude and direction of associations between BMI and UCVA (expressed in logMAR) and between BMI and RHR (beats per minute). The authors adjusted for relevant confounders; specific covariates adjusted for were not enumerated in the abstract.
The sample included adolescents across the 8–17 year age range. Descriptive comparisons showed sex differences: boys had higher BMI levels and a higher prevalence of overweight/obesity, while girls demonstrated poorer average UCVA. RHR exhibited an age-dependent pattern, decreasing progressively with increasing age and showing marginally lower values among boys. The abstract does not provide additional demographic breakdowns, geographic details of participating centers, or exact prevalence percentages.
After adjustment, the study found that each 1 kg/m² increment in BMI was associated with a −0.008 logMAR change in UCVA. This indicates a small decline in uncorrected visual acuity with higher BMI across the cohort. The BMI–UCVA relationship varied by age and sex: the inverse association was strongest between ages 8 and 11, attenuated across ages 12–16, and reversed at age 17. The association was reported as stronger in girls than in boys. The abstract does not report confidence intervals or p-values in the summary.
Adjusted analyses showed that every 1 kg/m² increase in BMI corresponded to a 0.26 beat-per-minute rise in RHR. RHR trends across adolescence decreased with age, with boys having slightly lower RHR than girls on average. The authors observed a notable age–sex interaction influencing RHR, indicating that how RHR changes with age differs between boys and girls. Specific model coefficients beyond the per–1 kg/m² estimate were not provided in the abstract.
A central finding is that age and sex jointly moderated the correlations among BMI, UCVA and RHR. The magnitude, statistical significance and even the direction of associations varied across developmental stages of adolescence. For example, the inverse BMI–UCVA link was most pronounced in early adolescence (8–11 years), weakened in middle adolescence, and reversed at 17 years. RHR fell steadily with age but showed sex-specific patterns. These patterns imply that a one-size-fits-all interpretation of BMI’s relationships with vision and cardiovascular proxies may be misleading without stratification by age and sex.
Based on these findings, the authors argue for more integrated adolescent screening practices that evaluate BMI, visual acuity, and resting heart rate comprehensively rather than in isolation. They propose unified screening and intervention strategies that are sex- and age-stratified, aiming to concurrently address obesity, myopia risk and early cardiovascular indicators. The authors suggest that developmental period–specific patterns should inform targeted prevention and intervention efforts during adolescence.
The study authors report having obtained ethics approval from the Ethics Committee of Zhoupu Hospital, Pudong New Area, Shanghai. The complete, de-identified dataset supporting the findings is available as a supplementary file (cleaned_data.csv) accompanying the preprint. The manuscript is posted as a medRxiv preprint and has not undergone peer review; the authors explicitly note it should not be used to guide clinical practice without further validation.
The abstract summarizes key results but does not provide full details on covariates included in adjusted models, effect estimates stratified by specific sex–age groups beyond described age bands, confidence intervals, p-values, or center-level characteristics. Those details are available in the full preprint and accompanying dataset but were not enumerated in the abstract.
In a large multicentre cohort of 130,832 adolescents, higher BMI was independently associated with marginally worse UCVA and slightly higher RHR, with both associations varying meaningfully by age and sex. The authors recommend integrated, age- and sex-specific screening approaches to address overlapping risks for obesity, myopia and cardiovascular health during adolescence.