Low-birth-weight (LBW) neonates in resource-limited newborn units experience high morbidity and mortality, but facility-level evidence on determinants of severe in-hospital outcomes at the county referral level in Kenya is limited. This mixed-methods cross-sectional study aimed to identify maternal, neonatal and care-related determinants of severe adverse outcomes among LBW neonates admitted to Kericho County Referral Hospital (KCRH) and to use healthcare-provider perspectives to explain the quantitative findings.
The investigators conducted a facility-based, convergent mixed-methods cross-sectional study. Quantitative data came from 169 LBW neonate–mother pairs and were obtained through structured maternal interviews and clinical-record abstraction. Qualitative data comprised nine key informant interviews with newborn-unit healthcare workers.
A severe adverse outcome was defined as the occurrence of at least one of the following: respiratory distress, sepsis, hypothermia, hypoglycaemia, prolonged neonatal unit stay (≥7 days) or neonatal death. Associations were examined using bivariate tests and a multivariable binary logistic regression model that entered 13 candidate predictors simultaneously. Model diagnostics reported included checks for multicollinearity, calibration and discrimination.
Among the 169 LBW neonates studied, 136 experienced a severe adverse outcome, representing 80.5% of the cohort. Respiratory distress was the most frequent single complication, occurring in 69.8% of neonates. On average, neonates experienced 2.46 adverse outcomes (SD 1.31), indicating that multiple complications per neonate were common.
In the adjusted multivariable logistic regression model (omnibus χ²(13) = 57.70, p < 0.001), three factors were independently associated with severe adverse outcome:
Lower birth weight: adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 0.997 per gram (95% CI 0.995–0.999; p = 0.012). This indicates increased risk as birth weight decreases, after adjustment for other candidate predictors.
Maternal pregnancy-induced hypertension: AOR 18.49 (95% CI 1.87–182.47; p = 0.013), indicating a strong association between maternal hypertensive disease and severe neonatal outcomes in this cohort.
Warm-chain care: AOR 10.94 (95% CI 1.40–85.41; p = 0.023). The authors noted this direction of association was consistent with confounding by indication, meaning neonates judged to be at higher risk were more likely to receive active warm-chain interventions.
Model calibration and discrimination were reported: Nagelkerke R² = 0.46 and area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve = 0.879, supporting reasonable explanatory power and good discrimination of the model for classifying severe adverse outcomes.
Nine key informant interviews with newborn-unit healthcare workers yielded themes that contextualised the quantitative findings. Providers emphasised several care processes and system constraints:
The first hour of stabilisation after birth is especially fragile for LBW neonates and requires prompt, skilled care.
Staffing levels and workload pressures influence ability to provide continuous, high-quality newborn care.
Maintaining the warm chain for thermoregulation is challenging in routine practice, with possible impacts on hypothermia and related complications.
Infection prevention practices and commodity availability (equipment, consumables) affect the unit’s capacity to prevent and manage sepsis and other complications.
Referral coordination—timely and organised transfer between facilities—was raised as important for ensuring neonates arrive for care early and in a condition amenable to stabilization.
Quantitative results identified neonatal biological vulnerability (lower birth weight) and maternal hypertensive disease as strong determinants of severe outcomes. The qualitative data explained how newborn-unit readiness and processes—staffing, warm-chain maintenance, infection prevention, commodity supplies and referral systems—interact with neonatal vulnerability to influence outcomes. The elevated odds associated with warm-chain care were interpreted in the study as potentially reflecting confounding by indication, where sicker or smaller neonates were more likely to receive targeted thermal care.
At this county referral hospital, severe adverse outcomes were near-universal among admitted LBW neonates. Determinants included neonatal birth weight, maternal pregnancy-induced hypertension and aspects of newborn-unit readiness and care processes.
The authors recommend prioritising early, birth-weight–based risk stratification for the smallest neonates, strengthening antenatal detection and management of maternal hypertensive disease, and improving reliability and timeliness of newborn-unit care processes—particularly stabilisation in the first hour, maintenance of the warm chain, infection prevention and ensuring essential commodities and referral coordination.
Notes on study context and reporting
This article is a preprint posted on medRxiv and has not been peer-reviewed; the source explicitly states it reports new medical research that has yet to be evaluated and should not be used to guide clinical practice without further validation. Ethical approval was reported from the Kabarak University Research Ethics Committee and the authors declared no competing interests. The source did not report additional limitations beyond those implicit in a facility-based, preprint report and did not provide external validation of findings.