This prospective longitudinal study evaluated developmental trajectories of autistic children during their first preschool year across different educational settings in southern Israel. The primary aim was to compare outcomes for children enrolled in special education (SE) programs with and without an extended intervention (TABAM) and children placed in mainstream education (ME). The investigators sought to determine whether setting-related differences in staff expertise, intervention capacity, and peer exposure were associated with differential gains across developmental domains.
The sample comprised 119 autistic children who attended preschools in southern Israel. They were grouped by preschool type: SE with TABAM (an extended intervention program), SE without TABAM, and ME. The three settings differ in their typical provision of structured autism interventions, staff training, exposure to typically developing peers, and associated costs. The study followed children over their first preschool year, with behavioral assessments conducted at the beginning and end of that year.
Children completed a battery of behavioral assessments at two time points to capture changes over the preschool year. Measured domains included:
These instruments were used to quantify developmental gains or stagnation across domains and to compare average trajectories by educational setting.
Developmental trajectories were heterogeneous across participants: some children achieved marked improvements in one or more domains while others showed limited progress. When averaged across the sample, changes during the first preschool year were generally modest across most assessed domains. Importantly, these average developmental changes were not explained by the type of educational setting for the majority of outcomes. In other words, children in ME and SE showed broadly similar developmental trajectories over this initial preschool year.
The sole domain in which educational setting was associated with differential gains was verbal ability. Children enrolled in SE programs that included the extended TABAM intervention demonstrated greater improvements in verbal skills compared with children in SE programs without TABAM. The source reports this specific between-group difference for verbal outcomes but does not provide additional effect sizes or statistical details in the summary.
Overall, the findings suggest that during the first preschool year autistic children in mainstream and special settings generally experienced similar, modest developmental changes across multiple domains. The observed advantage in verbal ability associated with the TABAM-extended SE program highlights that specific interventions delivered within educational settings may influence particular domains of development.
The authors conclude that larger-scale studies are needed to identify which children may benefit more from particular educational environments or intervention approaches. Such work could inform efforts to optimize preschool services, target resources efficiently, and guide individualized placement decisions based on child characteristics and intervention responsiveness.
Ethical approval was obtained from the Helsinki Committee of Soroka University Medical Center (approval number SOR-0222-14). The authors state that all required participant consent procedures were followed. Data that support the study findings are not publicly available for ethical and privacy reasons but may be obtained from the corresponding author upon reasonable request and subject to institutional approval. The study received support from the Azrieli Foundation. The authors declared no competing interests.
The study highlights important heterogeneity in developmental trajectories among autistic preschoolers but reports only modest average changes across the first preschool year. The summary indicates that most domains did not differ by educational setting, with the exception of verbal ability linked to the TABAM program. The source calls explicitly for larger-scale research to:
The source did not provide detailed statistical results, effect sizes, or subgroup analyses in the summary. Those details were not reported in the provided text and would need to be obtained from the full manuscript or supplementary materials for more granular interpretation.