This study quantified how three different time regimes — permanent standard time (ST), the current seasonal system (DST in summer, ST in winter), and permanent daylight saving time (DST) — change the number of school days on which K–12 students would need to leave home before sunrise. The authors used real, observed school start-time data for 14 U.S. states that had enacted permanent DST legislation to calculate local sunrise-relative departure times for each school day under each time regime.
Using observed start times, the analysis counted days when students would have to depart before local sunrise. The results contrasted current practice and permanent ST with permanent DST, showing that permanent DST shifts many winter departures to pre-sunrise times in the studied states.
The paper reports state-level results with a detailed example from Washington State. In Washington, the mean school start time was 08:27. Under both the current system and permanent ST, students in Washington on average did not need to leave before sunrise for most days. In contrast, permanent DST would require pre-sunrise departures for most of the winter period.
The Washington analysis translated observed start times into aggregate child-day counts of pre-sunrise travel. For Washington alone, the study estimated that permanent DST would add roughly 35 million child-days of pre-sunrise travel compared with the current time system, based on the real distribution of school start times in that state.
Beyond state-specific calculations, the authors extrapolated their findings to the national level. Using the observed start-time data and making a simplifying assumption of an 08:00 departure time for all U.S. public-school students, the paper projects that adopting permanent DST nationwide would generate more than 2 billion additional dark-morning commutes per year relative to the current system. This extrapolation is explicitly described as an assumption-based national estimate derived from the state-level data and the uniform-departure-time assumption.
The manuscript reports that similar patterns of increased pre-sunrise departures appeared across the other 13 studied states in addition to Washington, though the paper provides the Washington example as a detailed illustration.
To assess a potential safety consequence of increased dark-morning travel, the authors analyzed Seattle traffic-collision records. They compared collisions on dark-morning days with collisions on days when travel occurred after sunrise. The collision analysis revealed that the odds a crash involved a pedestrian were substantially higher on dark mornings: the adjusted odds ratio was 2.4, corresponding to a 143% increase in the odds that a crash involved a pedestrian on dark mornings.
The authors interpret this finding to indicate that more days with pre-sunrise student departures would coincide with elevated pedestrian-crash risk. They present this as direct evidence linking increased dark-morning exposure to higher pedestrian involvement in crashes, which is relevant to evaluating roadway safety impacts of time-policy decisions.
The authors state that code and data underlying the study are maintained in a private GitHub repository that will be made public and archived on Zenodo with a citable DOI upon publication of the manuscript. Prior to that release, data are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. The manuscript references a public Seattle collision dataset used for the traffic analysis.
The authors declare they have no competing interests. They confirm that relevant ethical guidelines were followed, that necessary institutional approvals were obtained, and that participant/consent procedures were completed and archived as applicable.
The study presents quantification of how a shift to permanent DST would increase the number of school departures occurring before sunrise, both in specific states and when extrapolated nationally. The substantial estimated increases—about 35 million child-days in Washington and more than 2 billion additional dark-morning commutes nationally under the study’s assumptions—are framed alongside empirical collision data showing higher pedestrian involvement on dark mornings (adjusted OR 2.4).
The authors conclude that permanent DST would expose many more children, on many more days, to elevated pedestrian-crash risk. They state that these safety consequences deserve consideration as policymakers decide whether to adopt permanent DST or permanent ST at the national level.