The ReDiKid longitudinal arm enrolls children aged 9–11 years with the explicit aim of mapping developmental change in resilience-related capacities and adaptive functioning. Investigators reported a school-based, nationally distributed sampling frame drawn from the Czech national register. Schools will be selected using stratified probability-proportional-to-size sampling. The stratification factors named by the study team are region, municipality status, and area-level socioeconomic status — concrete criteria intended to secure geographic and sociodemographic spread.
All Grade 4 and Grade 5 pupils in participating schools are invited to join. The recruitment plan covers approximately 72 schools and about 8,000 eligible children. The authors noted an anticipated 50–60% participation rate for complete child-parent pairs, which corresponds to a target baseline sample of roughly 4,000–4,800 linked dyads. The team aims to retain at least 1,000 linked dyads through Wave 4. Those sample targets inform feasibility and downstream analyses, but the source did not report exact weighting procedures or contingency plans should participation fall short.
The study will collect multi-informant data. Children provide self-report; parents supply self- and proxy-report data; and designated school coordinators complete online questionnaires about school context. Measures, as described in the protocol, cover: resilience-related capacities and resources; adaptive functioning and well-being; risk exposures across behavioural, family, school, and digital domains; patterns of digital engagement; health-related behaviours; parental mediation strategies; and school contextual features.
The study team explicitly separates measures of resilience-related capacities from evidence of resilience under adversity. That analytic distinction matters. It allows investigators to examine how capacities and resources evolve independently of whether a child has already demonstrated adaptive outcomes following adversity. The protocol treats digital environments as one interacting developmental context rather than an isolated exposure domain; investigators will therefore examine digital engagement alongside family and school factors, not as a stand-alone risk variable.
The source text did not list the exact psychometric instruments or individual questionnaire items. Researchers stated that analytic datasets, data dictionaries, and code will be shared post-study where legally permissible, which should clarify final measures and variable coding after completion.
Data collection is scheduled across four waves at approximately six-month intervals between autumn 2025 and spring 2027. The protocol frames this window as a transition period from middle childhood toward early adolescence — a developmental phase when exposures and adaptive capacities can change rapidly.
Online questionnaires are the primary data collection mode for child, parent, and school-coordinator reports. The initial recruitment target of ~4,000–4,800 child-parent dyads at baseline assumes 50–60% uptake among the eligible sample. Longitudinal planning aims for retention of at least 1,000 linked dyads by Wave 4, though the protocol did not detail planned retention strategies, incentives, or missing-data handling procedures; investigators will need to document those operational details as the study progresses.
Analyses will be tailored to specific research questions, the authors reported. Proposed approaches may include longitudinal and multilevel modelling to account for repeated measures and clustering within schools, reciprocal analyses to probe bidirectional associations between resources and outcomes, and person-oriented methods to identify subgroups with distinct resilience trajectories. The cohort design supports prospective examination of how evolving capacities and resources relate to emerging risk experiences and behaviours across contexts.
The protocol did not specify exact statistical models, power calculations, or threshold criteria for primary outcomes in the published document. Investigators signaled flexibility in analytical choices to match particular hypotheses, and they plan to complement variable-centered analyses with person-centered techniques where appropriate.
The ReDiKid project received ethical approvals from the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Physical Culture, Palacký University Olomouc (Approval No. 41/2024). The longitudinal component secured specific approval (Approval No. 10/2026, dated 13 January 2026). The research will follow the Declaration of Helsinki, Czech legislation, and GDPR requirements. The authors confirmed participant consent and archiving of institutional forms.
Data collection is ongoing. The protocol states that de-identified analytical datasets, data dictionaries, and analytical code will be made available after study completion subject to disclosure-risk assessment, project governance, and Data Access Committee procedures. Sensitive or potentially identifying variables may be available only under controlled access.
The protocol text lists several limitations and unresolved operational details. The source did not report the specific psychometric instruments to be used, item-level questionnaire content, planned retention tactics or incentives, detailed missing-data strategies, nor exact modelling specifications or power parameters. Those absent details will shape how findings can be interpreted and compared with other cohorts once the finalized analytic plans and instruments are released. The cohort’s success will also hinge on meeting projected participation and retention targets; the study team’s contingency plans for lower-than-expected enrollment were not described in the source.
The document ends with a practical statement of aims and governance rather than a broad synthesis. Remaining questions documented in the protocol include the exact measurement instruments to be published later, the detailed statistical plans to be finalized for particular research questions, and the conditions under which restricted data will be shared.